Cargando…

Unmasking local activity within local field potentials (LFPs) by removing distal electrical signals using independent component analysis

Local field potentials (LFPs) are commonly thought to reflect the aggregate dynamics in local neural circuits around recording electrodes. However, we show that when LFPs are recorded in awake behaving animals against a distal reference on the skull as commonly practiced, LFPs are significantly cont...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whitmore, Nathan W., Lin, Shih-Chieh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4885644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26899209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.032
_version_ 1782434539053776896
author Whitmore, Nathan W.
Lin, Shih-Chieh
author_facet Whitmore, Nathan W.
Lin, Shih-Chieh
author_sort Whitmore, Nathan W.
collection PubMed
description Local field potentials (LFPs) are commonly thought to reflect the aggregate dynamics in local neural circuits around recording electrodes. However, we show that when LFPs are recorded in awake behaving animals against a distal reference on the skull as commonly practiced, LFPs are significantly contaminated by non-local and non-neural sources arising from the reference electrode and from movement-related noise. In a data set with simultaneously recorded LFPs and electroencephalograms (EEGs) across multiple brain regions while rats perform an auditory oddball task, we used independent component analysis (ICA) to identify signals arising from electrical reference and from volume-conducted noise based on their distributed spatial pattern across multiple electrodes and distinct power spectral features. These sources of distal electrical signals collectively accounted for 23–77% of total variance in unprocessed LFPs, as well as most of the gamma oscillation responses to the target stimulus in EEGs. Gamma oscillation power was concentrated in volume-conducted noise and was tightly coupled with the onset of licking behavior, suggesting a likely origin of muscle activity associated with body movement or orofacial movement. The removal of distal signal contamination also selectively reduced correlations of LFP/EEG signals between distant brain regions but not within the same region. Finally, the removal of contamination from distal electrical signals preserved an event-related potential (ERP) response to auditory stimuli in the frontal cortex and also increased the coupling between the frontal ERP amplitude and neuronal activity in the basal forebrain, supporting the conclusion that removing distal electrical signals unmasked local activity within LFPs. Together, these results highlight the significant contamination of LFPs by distal electrical signals and caution against the straightforward interpretation of unprocessed LFPs. Our results provide a principled approach to identify and remove such contamination to unmask local LFPs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4885644
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48856442016-05-30 Unmasking local activity within local field potentials (LFPs) by removing distal electrical signals using independent component analysis Whitmore, Nathan W. Lin, Shih-Chieh Neuroimage Article Local field potentials (LFPs) are commonly thought to reflect the aggregate dynamics in local neural circuits around recording electrodes. However, we show that when LFPs are recorded in awake behaving animals against a distal reference on the skull as commonly practiced, LFPs are significantly contaminated by non-local and non-neural sources arising from the reference electrode and from movement-related noise. In a data set with simultaneously recorded LFPs and electroencephalograms (EEGs) across multiple brain regions while rats perform an auditory oddball task, we used independent component analysis (ICA) to identify signals arising from electrical reference and from volume-conducted noise based on their distributed spatial pattern across multiple electrodes and distinct power spectral features. These sources of distal electrical signals collectively accounted for 23–77% of total variance in unprocessed LFPs, as well as most of the gamma oscillation responses to the target stimulus in EEGs. Gamma oscillation power was concentrated in volume-conducted noise and was tightly coupled with the onset of licking behavior, suggesting a likely origin of muscle activity associated with body movement or orofacial movement. The removal of distal signal contamination also selectively reduced correlations of LFP/EEG signals between distant brain regions but not within the same region. Finally, the removal of contamination from distal electrical signals preserved an event-related potential (ERP) response to auditory stimuli in the frontal cortex and also increased the coupling between the frontal ERP amplitude and neuronal activity in the basal forebrain, supporting the conclusion that removing distal electrical signals unmasked local activity within LFPs. Together, these results highlight the significant contamination of LFPs by distal electrical signals and caution against the straightforward interpretation of unprocessed LFPs. Our results provide a principled approach to identify and remove such contamination to unmask local LFPs. 2016-02-16 2016-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4885644/ /pubmed/26899209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.032 Text en This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Whitmore, Nathan W.
Lin, Shih-Chieh
Unmasking local activity within local field potentials (LFPs) by removing distal electrical signals using independent component analysis
title Unmasking local activity within local field potentials (LFPs) by removing distal electrical signals using independent component analysis
title_full Unmasking local activity within local field potentials (LFPs) by removing distal electrical signals using independent component analysis
title_fullStr Unmasking local activity within local field potentials (LFPs) by removing distal electrical signals using independent component analysis
title_full_unstemmed Unmasking local activity within local field potentials (LFPs) by removing distal electrical signals using independent component analysis
title_short Unmasking local activity within local field potentials (LFPs) by removing distal electrical signals using independent component analysis
title_sort unmasking local activity within local field potentials (lfps) by removing distal electrical signals using independent component analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4885644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26899209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.032
work_keys_str_mv AT whitmorenathanw unmaskinglocalactivitywithinlocalfieldpotentialslfpsbyremovingdistalelectricalsignalsusingindependentcomponentanalysis
AT linshihchieh unmaskinglocalactivitywithinlocalfieldpotentialslfpsbyremovingdistalelectricalsignalsusingindependentcomponentanalysis