Cargando…

Flexural Strength Comparison of Silorane- and Methacrylate-Based Composites with Pre-impregnated Glass Fiber

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: Sufficient adhesion between silorane/methacrylate-based composites and methacrylate impregnated glass fiber increases the benefits of fibers and enhances the mechanical and clinical performance of both composites. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the compatibi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doozandeh, Maryam, Alavi, Ali Asghar, Karimizadeh, Zahra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4885667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27284555
_version_ 1782434540860473344
author Doozandeh, Maryam
Alavi, Ali Asghar
Karimizadeh, Zahra
author_facet Doozandeh, Maryam
Alavi, Ali Asghar
Karimizadeh, Zahra
author_sort Doozandeh, Maryam
collection PubMed
description STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: Sufficient adhesion between silorane/methacrylate-based composites and methacrylate impregnated glass fiber increases the benefits of fibers and enhances the mechanical and clinical performance of both composites. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the compatibility of silorane and methacrylate-based composites with pre-impregnated glass fiber by using flexural strength (FS) test. MATERIALS AND METHOD: A total of 60 bar specimens were prepared in a split mold (25×2×2 mm) in 6 groups (n=10). In groups 1 and 4 (control), silorane-based (Filtek P90) and nanohybrid (Filtek Z350) composites were placed into the mold and photopolymerized with a high-intensity curing unit. In groups 2 and 5, pre-impregnated glass fiber was first placed into the mold and after two minutes of curing, the mold was filled with respective composites. Prior to filling the mold in groups 3 and 6, an intermediate adhesive layer was applied to the glass fiber. The specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 hours and then their flexural strength was measured by 3 point bending test, using universal testing machine at the crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Two-way ANOVA and post-hoc test were used for analyzing the data (p< 0.05). RESULTS: A significant difference was observed between the groups (p< 0.05). The highest FS was registered for combination of Z350 composite, impregnated glass fiber, and application of intermediate adhesive layer .The lowest FS was obtained in Filtek P90 alone. Cohesive failure in composite was the predominant failure in all groups, except group 5 in which adhesive failure between the composite and fiber was exclusively observed. CONCLUSION: Significant improvement in FS was achieved for both composites with glass fiber. Additional application of intermediate adhesive layer before composite build up seems to increase FS. Nanohybrid composite showed higher FS than silorane-based composite.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4885667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48856672016-06-09 Flexural Strength Comparison of Silorane- and Methacrylate-Based Composites with Pre-impregnated Glass Fiber Doozandeh, Maryam Alavi, Ali Asghar Karimizadeh, Zahra J Dent (Shiraz) Original Article STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: Sufficient adhesion between silorane/methacrylate-based composites and methacrylate impregnated glass fiber increases the benefits of fibers and enhances the mechanical and clinical performance of both composites. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the compatibility of silorane and methacrylate-based composites with pre-impregnated glass fiber by using flexural strength (FS) test. MATERIALS AND METHOD: A total of 60 bar specimens were prepared in a split mold (25×2×2 mm) in 6 groups (n=10). In groups 1 and 4 (control), silorane-based (Filtek P90) and nanohybrid (Filtek Z350) composites were placed into the mold and photopolymerized with a high-intensity curing unit. In groups 2 and 5, pre-impregnated glass fiber was first placed into the mold and after two minutes of curing, the mold was filled with respective composites. Prior to filling the mold in groups 3 and 6, an intermediate adhesive layer was applied to the glass fiber. The specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 hours and then their flexural strength was measured by 3 point bending test, using universal testing machine at the crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Two-way ANOVA and post-hoc test were used for analyzing the data (p< 0.05). RESULTS: A significant difference was observed between the groups (p< 0.05). The highest FS was registered for combination of Z350 composite, impregnated glass fiber, and application of intermediate adhesive layer .The lowest FS was obtained in Filtek P90 alone. Cohesive failure in composite was the predominant failure in all groups, except group 5 in which adhesive failure between the composite and fiber was exclusively observed. CONCLUSION: Significant improvement in FS was achieved for both composites with glass fiber. Additional application of intermediate adhesive layer before composite build up seems to increase FS. Nanohybrid composite showed higher FS than silorane-based composite. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2016-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4885667/ /pubmed/27284555 Text en © 2016: Journal of dentistry (Shiraz) This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Doozandeh, Maryam
Alavi, Ali Asghar
Karimizadeh, Zahra
Flexural Strength Comparison of Silorane- and Methacrylate-Based Composites with Pre-impregnated Glass Fiber
title Flexural Strength Comparison of Silorane- and Methacrylate-Based Composites with Pre-impregnated Glass Fiber
title_full Flexural Strength Comparison of Silorane- and Methacrylate-Based Composites with Pre-impregnated Glass Fiber
title_fullStr Flexural Strength Comparison of Silorane- and Methacrylate-Based Composites with Pre-impregnated Glass Fiber
title_full_unstemmed Flexural Strength Comparison of Silorane- and Methacrylate-Based Composites with Pre-impregnated Glass Fiber
title_short Flexural Strength Comparison of Silorane- and Methacrylate-Based Composites with Pre-impregnated Glass Fiber
title_sort flexural strength comparison of silorane- and methacrylate-based composites with pre-impregnated glass fiber
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4885667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27284555
work_keys_str_mv AT doozandehmaryam flexuralstrengthcomparisonofsiloraneandmethacrylatebasedcompositeswithpreimpregnatedglassfiber
AT alavialiasghar flexuralstrengthcomparisonofsiloraneandmethacrylatebasedcompositeswithpreimpregnatedglassfiber
AT karimizadehzahra flexuralstrengthcomparisonofsiloraneandmethacrylatebasedcompositeswithpreimpregnatedglassfiber