Cargando…
Is More Always Better for Verbs? Semantic Richness Effects and Verb Meaning
We examined how several semantic richness variables contribute to verb meaning, across a number of tasks. Because verbs can vary in tense, and the manner in which tense is coded (i.e., regularity), we also examined how these factors moderated the effects of semantic richness. In Experiment 1 we foun...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4885847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27303353 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00798 |
_version_ | 1782434562697068544 |
---|---|
author | Sidhu, David M. Heard, Alison Pexman, Penny M. |
author_facet | Sidhu, David M. Heard, Alison Pexman, Penny M. |
author_sort | Sidhu, David M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We examined how several semantic richness variables contribute to verb meaning, across a number of tasks. Because verbs can vary in tense, and the manner in which tense is coded (i.e., regularity), we also examined how these factors moderated the effects of semantic richness. In Experiment 1 we found that age of acquisition (AoA), valence, arousal and embodiment predicted faster response times in LDT. In Experiment 2 we examined a particular semantic richness variable, verb embodiment, and found that it was moderated by tense and regularity. In Experiment 3a we found that AoA predicted faster response times in verb reading. Finally, in Experiment 3b, semantic diversity predicted response times in a past tense generation task, either facilitating or inhibiting responses for regular or irregular verbs, respectively. These results demonstrate that semantic richness variables contribute to verb meaning even when verbs are presented in isolation, and that these effects depend on several factors unique to verbs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4885847 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48858472016-06-14 Is More Always Better for Verbs? Semantic Richness Effects and Verb Meaning Sidhu, David M. Heard, Alison Pexman, Penny M. Front Psychol Psychology We examined how several semantic richness variables contribute to verb meaning, across a number of tasks. Because verbs can vary in tense, and the manner in which tense is coded (i.e., regularity), we also examined how these factors moderated the effects of semantic richness. In Experiment 1 we found that age of acquisition (AoA), valence, arousal and embodiment predicted faster response times in LDT. In Experiment 2 we examined a particular semantic richness variable, verb embodiment, and found that it was moderated by tense and regularity. In Experiment 3a we found that AoA predicted faster response times in verb reading. Finally, in Experiment 3b, semantic diversity predicted response times in a past tense generation task, either facilitating or inhibiting responses for regular or irregular verbs, respectively. These results demonstrate that semantic richness variables contribute to verb meaning even when verbs are presented in isolation, and that these effects depend on several factors unique to verbs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4885847/ /pubmed/27303353 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00798 Text en Copyright © 2016 Sidhu, Heard and Pexman. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Sidhu, David M. Heard, Alison Pexman, Penny M. Is More Always Better for Verbs? Semantic Richness Effects and Verb Meaning |
title | Is More Always Better for Verbs? Semantic Richness Effects and Verb Meaning |
title_full | Is More Always Better for Verbs? Semantic Richness Effects and Verb Meaning |
title_fullStr | Is More Always Better for Verbs? Semantic Richness Effects and Verb Meaning |
title_full_unstemmed | Is More Always Better for Verbs? Semantic Richness Effects and Verb Meaning |
title_short | Is More Always Better for Verbs? Semantic Richness Effects and Verb Meaning |
title_sort | is more always better for verbs? semantic richness effects and verb meaning |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4885847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27303353 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00798 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sidhudavidm ismorealwaysbetterforverbssemanticrichnesseffectsandverbmeaning AT heardalison ismorealwaysbetterforverbssemanticrichnesseffectsandverbmeaning AT pexmanpennym ismorealwaysbetterforverbssemanticrichnesseffectsandverbmeaning |