Cargando…

Effects of Prompting in Reflective Learning Tools: Findings from Experimental Field, Lab, and Online Studies

Reflective learning is an important type of learning both in formal and informal situations—in school, higher education, at the workplace, and in everyday life. People may benefit from technical support for reflective learning, in particular when supporting each other by reflecting not only upon the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Renner, Bettina, Prilla, Michael, Cress, Ulrike, Kimmerle, Joachim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4885864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27303361
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00820
_version_ 1782434566575751168
author Renner, Bettina
Prilla, Michael
Cress, Ulrike
Kimmerle, Joachim
author_facet Renner, Bettina
Prilla, Michael
Cress, Ulrike
Kimmerle, Joachim
author_sort Renner, Bettina
collection PubMed
description Reflective learning is an important type of learning both in formal and informal situations—in school, higher education, at the workplace, and in everyday life. People may benefit from technical support for reflective learning, in particular when supporting each other by reflecting not only upon their own but also upon other people’s problems. We refer to this collective approach where people come together to think about experiences and find solutions to problems as “collaborative reflection.” We present three empirical studies about the effects of prompting in reflective learning tools in such situations where people reflect on others’ issues. In Study 1 we applied a three-stage within-group design in a field experiment, where 39 participants from two organizations received different types of prompts while they used a reflection app. We found that prompts that invited employees to write down possible solutions led to more comprehensive comments on their colleagues’ experiences. In Study 2 we used a three-stage between-group design in a laboratory experiment, where 78 university students were invited to take part in an experiment about the discussion of problems at work or academic studies in online forums. Here we found that short, abstract prompts showed no superiority to a situation without any prompts with respect to quantity or quality of contributions. Finally, Study 3 featured a two-stage between-group design in an online experiment, where 60 participants received either general reflection instructions or detailed instructions about how to reflect on other people’s problems. We could show that detailed reflection instructions supported people in producing more comprehensive comments that included more general advice. The results demonstrate that to increase activity and to improve quality of comments with prompting tools require detailed instructions and specific wording of the prompts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4885864
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48858642016-06-14 Effects of Prompting in Reflective Learning Tools: Findings from Experimental Field, Lab, and Online Studies Renner, Bettina Prilla, Michael Cress, Ulrike Kimmerle, Joachim Front Psychol Psychology Reflective learning is an important type of learning both in formal and informal situations—in school, higher education, at the workplace, and in everyday life. People may benefit from technical support for reflective learning, in particular when supporting each other by reflecting not only upon their own but also upon other people’s problems. We refer to this collective approach where people come together to think about experiences and find solutions to problems as “collaborative reflection.” We present three empirical studies about the effects of prompting in reflective learning tools in such situations where people reflect on others’ issues. In Study 1 we applied a three-stage within-group design in a field experiment, where 39 participants from two organizations received different types of prompts while they used a reflection app. We found that prompts that invited employees to write down possible solutions led to more comprehensive comments on their colleagues’ experiences. In Study 2 we used a three-stage between-group design in a laboratory experiment, where 78 university students were invited to take part in an experiment about the discussion of problems at work or academic studies in online forums. Here we found that short, abstract prompts showed no superiority to a situation without any prompts with respect to quantity or quality of contributions. Finally, Study 3 featured a two-stage between-group design in an online experiment, where 60 participants received either general reflection instructions or detailed instructions about how to reflect on other people’s problems. We could show that detailed reflection instructions supported people in producing more comprehensive comments that included more general advice. The results demonstrate that to increase activity and to improve quality of comments with prompting tools require detailed instructions and specific wording of the prompts. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4885864/ /pubmed/27303361 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00820 Text en Copyright © 2016 Renner, Prilla, Cress and Kimmerle. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Renner, Bettina
Prilla, Michael
Cress, Ulrike
Kimmerle, Joachim
Effects of Prompting in Reflective Learning Tools: Findings from Experimental Field, Lab, and Online Studies
title Effects of Prompting in Reflective Learning Tools: Findings from Experimental Field, Lab, and Online Studies
title_full Effects of Prompting in Reflective Learning Tools: Findings from Experimental Field, Lab, and Online Studies
title_fullStr Effects of Prompting in Reflective Learning Tools: Findings from Experimental Field, Lab, and Online Studies
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Prompting in Reflective Learning Tools: Findings from Experimental Field, Lab, and Online Studies
title_short Effects of Prompting in Reflective Learning Tools: Findings from Experimental Field, Lab, and Online Studies
title_sort effects of prompting in reflective learning tools: findings from experimental field, lab, and online studies
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4885864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27303361
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00820
work_keys_str_mv AT rennerbettina effectsofpromptinginreflectivelearningtoolsfindingsfromexperimentalfieldlabandonlinestudies
AT prillamichael effectsofpromptinginreflectivelearningtoolsfindingsfromexperimentalfieldlabandonlinestudies
AT cressulrike effectsofpromptinginreflectivelearningtoolsfindingsfromexperimentalfieldlabandonlinestudies
AT kimmerlejoachim effectsofpromptinginreflectivelearningtoolsfindingsfromexperimentalfieldlabandonlinestudies