Cargando…

Mechanisms controlling human head stabilization during random rotational perturbations in the horizontal plane revisited

This study repeats the experimental protocol for investigation of head stabilization in healthy humans, described by Keshner and Peterson (1995) but with a modification of the analysis. Head movements were considered with respect to the room instead of relative to the trunk. The aim was to investiga...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stensdotter, Ann‐Katrin, DinhoffPedersen, Morten, Meisingset, Ingebrigt, Vasseljen, Ottar, Stavdahl, Øyvind
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4886158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27225623
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12745
_version_ 1782434587817803776
author Stensdotter, Ann‐Katrin
DinhoffPedersen, Morten
Meisingset, Ingebrigt
Vasseljen, Ottar
Stavdahl, Øyvind
author_facet Stensdotter, Ann‐Katrin
DinhoffPedersen, Morten
Meisingset, Ingebrigt
Vasseljen, Ottar
Stavdahl, Øyvind
author_sort Stensdotter, Ann‐Katrin
collection PubMed
description This study repeats the experimental protocol for investigation of head stabilization in healthy humans, described by Keshner and Peterson (1995) but with a modification of the analysis. Head movements were considered with respect to the room instead of relative to the trunk. The aim was to investigate the approximate contribution of reflex and voluntary control across perturbing frequencies and conditions with modulation of visual information and mental attention and discuss the resulting outcome while comparing methods. Seventeen healthy individuals were asked to keep the head steady in space while subjected to pseudorandom rotational perturbations in the horizontal plane, firmly seated on an actuated chair. Both methods confirmed the results for gain in previous studies showing fair ability to keep the head steady in space below 1 Hz with vision. Compensation deteriorated when vision was removed and worsened further with addition of a mental task. Between 1 and 2 Hz, unity gain occurred between head and trunk movements, whereas above 2 Hz the head moved more than the trunk. For phase angles, the original method demonstrated a phase split occurring from ~1 Hz, a purely mathematical artifact that caused subjects with virtually identical movements to appear as significantly different. This artifact was eliminated by analyzing the head‐room relative to trunk‐room rather than head–trunk relative to trunk‐room angles, thus preventing potentially erroneous interpretations of the results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4886158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48861582016-08-17 Mechanisms controlling human head stabilization during random rotational perturbations in the horizontal plane revisited Stensdotter, Ann‐Katrin DinhoffPedersen, Morten Meisingset, Ingebrigt Vasseljen, Ottar Stavdahl, Øyvind Physiol Rep Original Research This study repeats the experimental protocol for investigation of head stabilization in healthy humans, described by Keshner and Peterson (1995) but with a modification of the analysis. Head movements were considered with respect to the room instead of relative to the trunk. The aim was to investigate the approximate contribution of reflex and voluntary control across perturbing frequencies and conditions with modulation of visual information and mental attention and discuss the resulting outcome while comparing methods. Seventeen healthy individuals were asked to keep the head steady in space while subjected to pseudorandom rotational perturbations in the horizontal plane, firmly seated on an actuated chair. Both methods confirmed the results for gain in previous studies showing fair ability to keep the head steady in space below 1 Hz with vision. Compensation deteriorated when vision was removed and worsened further with addition of a mental task. Between 1 and 2 Hz, unity gain occurred between head and trunk movements, whereas above 2 Hz the head moved more than the trunk. For phase angles, the original method demonstrated a phase split occurring from ~1 Hz, a purely mathematical artifact that caused subjects with virtually identical movements to appear as significantly different. This artifact was eliminated by analyzing the head‐room relative to trunk‐room rather than head–trunk relative to trunk‐room angles, thus preventing potentially erroneous interpretations of the results. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4886158/ /pubmed/27225623 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12745 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Physiological Society and The Physiological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Stensdotter, Ann‐Katrin
DinhoffPedersen, Morten
Meisingset, Ingebrigt
Vasseljen, Ottar
Stavdahl, Øyvind
Mechanisms controlling human head stabilization during random rotational perturbations in the horizontal plane revisited
title Mechanisms controlling human head stabilization during random rotational perturbations in the horizontal plane revisited
title_full Mechanisms controlling human head stabilization during random rotational perturbations in the horizontal plane revisited
title_fullStr Mechanisms controlling human head stabilization during random rotational perturbations in the horizontal plane revisited
title_full_unstemmed Mechanisms controlling human head stabilization during random rotational perturbations in the horizontal plane revisited
title_short Mechanisms controlling human head stabilization during random rotational perturbations in the horizontal plane revisited
title_sort mechanisms controlling human head stabilization during random rotational perturbations in the horizontal plane revisited
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4886158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27225623
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12745
work_keys_str_mv AT stensdotterannkatrin mechanismscontrollinghumanheadstabilizationduringrandomrotationalperturbationsinthehorizontalplanerevisited
AT dinhoffpedersenmorten mechanismscontrollinghumanheadstabilizationduringrandomrotationalperturbationsinthehorizontalplanerevisited
AT meisingsetingebrigt mechanismscontrollinghumanheadstabilizationduringrandomrotationalperturbationsinthehorizontalplanerevisited
AT vasseljenottar mechanismscontrollinghumanheadstabilizationduringrandomrotationalperturbationsinthehorizontalplanerevisited
AT stavdahløyvind mechanismscontrollinghumanheadstabilizationduringrandomrotationalperturbationsinthehorizontalplanerevisited