Cargando…

Can implementation support help community-based settings better deliver evidence-based sexual health promotion programs? A randomized trial of Getting To Outcomes®

BACKGROUND: Research is needed to evaluate the impact of implementation support interventions over and above typical efforts by community settings to deploy evidence-based prevention programs. METHODS: Enhancing Quality Interventions Promoting Healthy Sexuality is a randomized controlled trial testi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chinman, Matthew, Acosta, Joie, Ebener, Patricia, Malone, Patrick S., Slaughter, Mary E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4886421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27245158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0446-y
_version_ 1782434615482384384
author Chinman, Matthew
Acosta, Joie
Ebener, Patricia
Malone, Patrick S.
Slaughter, Mary E.
author_facet Chinman, Matthew
Acosta, Joie
Ebener, Patricia
Malone, Patrick S.
Slaughter, Mary E.
author_sort Chinman, Matthew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Research is needed to evaluate the impact of implementation support interventions over and above typical efforts by community settings to deploy evidence-based prevention programs. METHODS: Enhancing Quality Interventions Promoting Healthy Sexuality is a randomized controlled trial testing Getting To Outcomes (GTO), a 2-year implementation support intervention. It compares 16 Boys and Girls Club sites implementing Making Proud Choices (MPC, control group), a structured teen pregnancy prevention evidence-based program with 16 similar sites implementing MPC augmented with GTO (intervention group). All sites received training and manuals typical for MPC. GTO has its own manuals, training, and onsite technical assistance (TA) to help practitioners complete key programming practices specified by GTO. During the first year, TA providers helped the intervention group adopt, plan, and deliver MPC. This group then received training on the evaluation and quality improvement steps of GTO, including feedback reports summarizing their data, which were used in a TA-facilitated quality improvement process that yielded revised plans for the second MPC implementation. This paper presents results regarding GTO’s impact on performance of the sites (i.e., how well key programming practices were carried out), fidelity of MPC implementation, and the relationship between amount of TA support, performance, and fidelity. Performance was measured using ratings made from a standardized, structured interview conducted with participating staff at all 32 Boys and Girls Clubs sites after the first and second years of MPC implementation. Multiple elements of fidelity (adherence, classroom delivery, dosage) were assessed at all sites by observer ratings and attendance logs. RESULTS: After 2 years, the intervention sites had higher ratings of performance, adherence, and classroom delivery (dosage remained similar). Higher performance predicted greater adherence in both years. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that in typical community-based settings, manuals and training common to structured EBPs may be sufficient to yield low levels of performance and moderate levels of fidelity but that systematic implementation support is needed to achieve high levels of performance and fidelity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01818791
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4886421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48864212016-06-01 Can implementation support help community-based settings better deliver evidence-based sexual health promotion programs? A randomized trial of Getting To Outcomes® Chinman, Matthew Acosta, Joie Ebener, Patricia Malone, Patrick S. Slaughter, Mary E. Implement Sci Research BACKGROUND: Research is needed to evaluate the impact of implementation support interventions over and above typical efforts by community settings to deploy evidence-based prevention programs. METHODS: Enhancing Quality Interventions Promoting Healthy Sexuality is a randomized controlled trial testing Getting To Outcomes (GTO), a 2-year implementation support intervention. It compares 16 Boys and Girls Club sites implementing Making Proud Choices (MPC, control group), a structured teen pregnancy prevention evidence-based program with 16 similar sites implementing MPC augmented with GTO (intervention group). All sites received training and manuals typical for MPC. GTO has its own manuals, training, and onsite technical assistance (TA) to help practitioners complete key programming practices specified by GTO. During the first year, TA providers helped the intervention group adopt, plan, and deliver MPC. This group then received training on the evaluation and quality improvement steps of GTO, including feedback reports summarizing their data, which were used in a TA-facilitated quality improvement process that yielded revised plans for the second MPC implementation. This paper presents results regarding GTO’s impact on performance of the sites (i.e., how well key programming practices were carried out), fidelity of MPC implementation, and the relationship between amount of TA support, performance, and fidelity. Performance was measured using ratings made from a standardized, structured interview conducted with participating staff at all 32 Boys and Girls Clubs sites after the first and second years of MPC implementation. Multiple elements of fidelity (adherence, classroom delivery, dosage) were assessed at all sites by observer ratings and attendance logs. RESULTS: After 2 years, the intervention sites had higher ratings of performance, adherence, and classroom delivery (dosage remained similar). Higher performance predicted greater adherence in both years. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that in typical community-based settings, manuals and training common to structured EBPs may be sufficient to yield low levels of performance and moderate levels of fidelity but that systematic implementation support is needed to achieve high levels of performance and fidelity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01818791 BioMed Central 2016-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4886421/ /pubmed/27245158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0446-y Text en © Chinman et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Chinman, Matthew
Acosta, Joie
Ebener, Patricia
Malone, Patrick S.
Slaughter, Mary E.
Can implementation support help community-based settings better deliver evidence-based sexual health promotion programs? A randomized trial of Getting To Outcomes®
title Can implementation support help community-based settings better deliver evidence-based sexual health promotion programs? A randomized trial of Getting To Outcomes®
title_full Can implementation support help community-based settings better deliver evidence-based sexual health promotion programs? A randomized trial of Getting To Outcomes®
title_fullStr Can implementation support help community-based settings better deliver evidence-based sexual health promotion programs? A randomized trial of Getting To Outcomes®
title_full_unstemmed Can implementation support help community-based settings better deliver evidence-based sexual health promotion programs? A randomized trial of Getting To Outcomes®
title_short Can implementation support help community-based settings better deliver evidence-based sexual health promotion programs? A randomized trial of Getting To Outcomes®
title_sort can implementation support help community-based settings better deliver evidence-based sexual health promotion programs? a randomized trial of getting to outcomes®
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4886421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27245158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0446-y
work_keys_str_mv AT chinmanmatthew canimplementationsupporthelpcommunitybasedsettingsbetterdeliverevidencebasedsexualhealthpromotionprogramsarandomizedtrialofgettingtooutcomes
AT acostajoie canimplementationsupporthelpcommunitybasedsettingsbetterdeliverevidencebasedsexualhealthpromotionprogramsarandomizedtrialofgettingtooutcomes
AT ebenerpatricia canimplementationsupporthelpcommunitybasedsettingsbetterdeliverevidencebasedsexualhealthpromotionprogramsarandomizedtrialofgettingtooutcomes
AT malonepatricks canimplementationsupporthelpcommunitybasedsettingsbetterdeliverevidencebasedsexualhealthpromotionprogramsarandomizedtrialofgettingtooutcomes
AT slaughtermarye canimplementationsupporthelpcommunitybasedsettingsbetterdeliverevidencebasedsexualhealthpromotionprogramsarandomizedtrialofgettingtooutcomes