Cargando…
Familiarity, but not Recollection, Supports the Between-Subject Production Effect in Recognition Memory
Five experiments explored the basis of the between-subjects production effect in recognition memory as represented by differences in the recollection and familiarity of produced (read aloud) and nonproduced (read silently) words. Using remember-know judgments (Experiment 1b) and a dual-process signa...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Educational Publishing Foundation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4886847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27244352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/cep0000089 |
_version_ | 1782434662278234112 |
---|---|
author | Fawcett, Jonathan M. Ozubko, Jason D. |
author_facet | Fawcett, Jonathan M. Ozubko, Jason D. |
author_sort | Fawcett, Jonathan M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Five experiments explored the basis of the between-subjects production effect in recognition memory as represented by differences in the recollection and familiarity of produced (read aloud) and nonproduced (read silently) words. Using remember-know judgments (Experiment 1b) and a dual-process signal-detection approach applied to confidence ratings (Experiments 2b and 3), we observed that production influences familiarity but not recollection when manipulated between-subjects. This is in contrast to within-subject designs, which reveal a clear effect of production on both recollection and familiarity (Experiments 1a and 2a). Our findings resolve contention concerning apparent design effects: Whereas the within-subject production effect is subserved by separable recollective- and familiarity-based components, the between-subjects production effect is subserved by the familiarity-based component alone. Our findings support a role for the relative distinctiveness of production as a means of guiding recognition judgments (at least when manipulated within-subjects), but we also propose that production influences the strength of produced items, explaining the persistence of the effect in between-subjects designs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4886847 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Educational Publishing Foundation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48868472016-06-08 Familiarity, but not Recollection, Supports the Between-Subject Production Effect in Recognition Memory Fawcett, Jonathan M. Ozubko, Jason D. Can J Exp Psychol Article Five experiments explored the basis of the between-subjects production effect in recognition memory as represented by differences in the recollection and familiarity of produced (read aloud) and nonproduced (read silently) words. Using remember-know judgments (Experiment 1b) and a dual-process signal-detection approach applied to confidence ratings (Experiments 2b and 3), we observed that production influences familiarity but not recollection when manipulated between-subjects. This is in contrast to within-subject designs, which reveal a clear effect of production on both recollection and familiarity (Experiments 1a and 2a). Our findings resolve contention concerning apparent design effects: Whereas the within-subject production effect is subserved by separable recollective- and familiarity-based components, the between-subjects production effect is subserved by the familiarity-based component alone. Our findings support a role for the relative distinctiveness of production as a means of guiding recognition judgments (at least when manipulated within-subjects), but we also propose that production influences the strength of produced items, explaining the persistence of the effect in between-subjects designs. Educational Publishing Foundation 2016-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4886847/ /pubmed/27244352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/cep0000089 Text en © 2016 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article has been published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s). Author(s) grant(s) the American Psychological Association the exclusive right to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher. |
spellingShingle | Article Fawcett, Jonathan M. Ozubko, Jason D. Familiarity, but not Recollection, Supports the Between-Subject Production Effect in Recognition Memory |
title | Familiarity, but not Recollection, Supports the Between-Subject Production Effect in Recognition Memory |
title_full | Familiarity, but not Recollection, Supports the Between-Subject Production Effect in Recognition Memory |
title_fullStr | Familiarity, but not Recollection, Supports the Between-Subject Production Effect in Recognition Memory |
title_full_unstemmed | Familiarity, but not Recollection, Supports the Between-Subject Production Effect in Recognition Memory |
title_short | Familiarity, but not Recollection, Supports the Between-Subject Production Effect in Recognition Memory |
title_sort | familiarity, but not recollection, supports the between-subject production effect in recognition memory |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4886847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27244352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/cep0000089 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fawcettjonathanm familiaritybutnotrecollectionsupportsthebetweensubjectproductioneffectinrecognitionmemory AT ozubkojasond familiaritybutnotrecollectionsupportsthebetweensubjectproductioneffectinrecognitionmemory |