Cargando…

Familiarity, but not Recollection, Supports the Between-Subject Production Effect in Recognition Memory

Five experiments explored the basis of the between-subjects production effect in recognition memory as represented by differences in the recollection and familiarity of produced (read aloud) and nonproduced (read silently) words. Using remember-know judgments (Experiment 1b) and a dual-process signa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fawcett, Jonathan M., Ozubko, Jason D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Educational Publishing Foundation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4886847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27244352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/cep0000089
_version_ 1782434662278234112
author Fawcett, Jonathan M.
Ozubko, Jason D.
author_facet Fawcett, Jonathan M.
Ozubko, Jason D.
author_sort Fawcett, Jonathan M.
collection PubMed
description Five experiments explored the basis of the between-subjects production effect in recognition memory as represented by differences in the recollection and familiarity of produced (read aloud) and nonproduced (read silently) words. Using remember-know judgments (Experiment 1b) and a dual-process signal-detection approach applied to confidence ratings (Experiments 2b and 3), we observed that production influences familiarity but not recollection when manipulated between-subjects. This is in contrast to within-subject designs, which reveal a clear effect of production on both recollection and familiarity (Experiments 1a and 2a). Our findings resolve contention concerning apparent design effects: Whereas the within-subject production effect is subserved by separable recollective- and familiarity-based components, the between-subjects production effect is subserved by the familiarity-based component alone. Our findings support a role for the relative distinctiveness of production as a means of guiding recognition judgments (at least when manipulated within-subjects), but we also propose that production influences the strength of produced items, explaining the persistence of the effect in between-subjects designs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4886847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Educational Publishing Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48868472016-06-08 Familiarity, but not Recollection, Supports the Between-Subject Production Effect in Recognition Memory Fawcett, Jonathan M. Ozubko, Jason D. Can J Exp Psychol Article Five experiments explored the basis of the between-subjects production effect in recognition memory as represented by differences in the recollection and familiarity of produced (read aloud) and nonproduced (read silently) words. Using remember-know judgments (Experiment 1b) and a dual-process signal-detection approach applied to confidence ratings (Experiments 2b and 3), we observed that production influences familiarity but not recollection when manipulated between-subjects. This is in contrast to within-subject designs, which reveal a clear effect of production on both recollection and familiarity (Experiments 1a and 2a). Our findings resolve contention concerning apparent design effects: Whereas the within-subject production effect is subserved by separable recollective- and familiarity-based components, the between-subjects production effect is subserved by the familiarity-based component alone. Our findings support a role for the relative distinctiveness of production as a means of guiding recognition judgments (at least when manipulated within-subjects), but we also propose that production influences the strength of produced items, explaining the persistence of the effect in between-subjects designs. Educational Publishing Foundation 2016-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4886847/ /pubmed/27244352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/cep0000089 Text en © 2016 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article has been published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s). Author(s) grant(s) the American Psychological Association the exclusive right to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher.
spellingShingle Article
Fawcett, Jonathan M.
Ozubko, Jason D.
Familiarity, but not Recollection, Supports the Between-Subject Production Effect in Recognition Memory
title Familiarity, but not Recollection, Supports the Between-Subject Production Effect in Recognition Memory
title_full Familiarity, but not Recollection, Supports the Between-Subject Production Effect in Recognition Memory
title_fullStr Familiarity, but not Recollection, Supports the Between-Subject Production Effect in Recognition Memory
title_full_unstemmed Familiarity, but not Recollection, Supports the Between-Subject Production Effect in Recognition Memory
title_short Familiarity, but not Recollection, Supports the Between-Subject Production Effect in Recognition Memory
title_sort familiarity, but not recollection, supports the between-subject production effect in recognition memory
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4886847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27244352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/cep0000089
work_keys_str_mv AT fawcettjonathanm familiaritybutnotrecollectionsupportsthebetweensubjectproductioneffectinrecognitionmemory
AT ozubkojasond familiaritybutnotrecollectionsupportsthebetweensubjectproductioneffectinrecognitionmemory