Cargando…

Microform Calibration Uncertainties of Rockwell Diamond Indenters

National and international comparisons in Rockwell hardness tests show significant differences. Uncertainties in the geometry of the Rockwell diamond indenters are largely responsible for these differences. By using a stylus instrument, with a series of calibration and check standards, and calibrati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, J. F., Rudder, F. F., Vorburger, T. V., Smith, J. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: [Gaithersburg, MD] : U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology 1995
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4887228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29151760
http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.100.041
_version_ 1782434707440402432
author Song, J. F.
Rudder, F. F.
Vorburger, T. V.
Smith, J. H.
author_facet Song, J. F.
Rudder, F. F.
Vorburger, T. V.
Smith, J. H.
author_sort Song, J. F.
collection PubMed
description National and international comparisons in Rockwell hardness tests show significant differences. Uncertainties in the geometry of the Rockwell diamond indenters are largely responsible for these differences. By using a stylus instrument, with a series of calibration and check standards, and calibration and uncertainty calculation procedures, we have calibrated the microform geometric parameters of Rockwell diamond indenters. These calibrations are traceable to fundamental standards. The expanded uncertainties (95 % level of confidence) are ±0.3 μm for the least-squares radius; ±0.01° for the cone angle; and ±0.025° for the holder axis alignment calibrations. Under ISO and NIST guidelines for expressing measurement uncertainties, the calibration and uncertainty calculation procedure, error sources, and uncertainty components are described, and the expanded uncertainties are calculated. The instrumentation and calibration procedure also allows the measurement of profile deviation from the least-squares radius and cone flank straightness. The surface roughness and the shape of the spherical tip of the diamond indenter can also be explored and quantified. Our calibration approach makes it possible to quantify the uncertainty, uniformity, and reproducibility of Rockwell diamond indenter microform geometry, as well as to unify the Rockwell hardness standards, through fundamental measurements rather than by performance comparisons.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4887228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1995
publisher [Gaithersburg, MD] : U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48872282017-11-17 Microform Calibration Uncertainties of Rockwell Diamond Indenters Song, J. F. Rudder, F. F. Vorburger, T. V. Smith, J. H. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol Article National and international comparisons in Rockwell hardness tests show significant differences. Uncertainties in the geometry of the Rockwell diamond indenters are largely responsible for these differences. By using a stylus instrument, with a series of calibration and check standards, and calibration and uncertainty calculation procedures, we have calibrated the microform geometric parameters of Rockwell diamond indenters. These calibrations are traceable to fundamental standards. The expanded uncertainties (95 % level of confidence) are ±0.3 μm for the least-squares radius; ±0.01° for the cone angle; and ±0.025° for the holder axis alignment calibrations. Under ISO and NIST guidelines for expressing measurement uncertainties, the calibration and uncertainty calculation procedure, error sources, and uncertainty components are described, and the expanded uncertainties are calculated. The instrumentation and calibration procedure also allows the measurement of profile deviation from the least-squares radius and cone flank straightness. The surface roughness and the shape of the spherical tip of the diamond indenter can also be explored and quantified. Our calibration approach makes it possible to quantify the uncertainty, uniformity, and reproducibility of Rockwell diamond indenter microform geometry, as well as to unify the Rockwell hardness standards, through fundamental measurements rather than by performance comparisons. [Gaithersburg, MD] : U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology 1995 /pmc/articles/PMC4887228/ /pubmed/29151760 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.100.041 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ The Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology is a publication of the U.S. Government. The papers are in the public domain and are not subject to copyright in the United States. Articles from J Res may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Article
Song, J. F.
Rudder, F. F.
Vorburger, T. V.
Smith, J. H.
Microform Calibration Uncertainties of Rockwell Diamond Indenters
title Microform Calibration Uncertainties of Rockwell Diamond Indenters
title_full Microform Calibration Uncertainties of Rockwell Diamond Indenters
title_fullStr Microform Calibration Uncertainties of Rockwell Diamond Indenters
title_full_unstemmed Microform Calibration Uncertainties of Rockwell Diamond Indenters
title_short Microform Calibration Uncertainties of Rockwell Diamond Indenters
title_sort microform calibration uncertainties of rockwell diamond indenters
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4887228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29151760
http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.100.041
work_keys_str_mv AT songjf microformcalibrationuncertaintiesofrockwelldiamondindenters
AT rudderff microformcalibrationuncertaintiesofrockwelldiamondindenters
AT vorburgertv microformcalibrationuncertaintiesofrockwelldiamondindenters
AT smithjh microformcalibrationuncertaintiesofrockwelldiamondindenters