Cargando…

Cosmetic outcome of skin adhesives versus transcutaneous sutures in laparoscopic port-site wounds: a prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: In an elective laparoscopic surgery, the cosmetic outcome becomes increasingly important. We conducted a study to evaluate the cosmetic outcome 3 months after a laparoscopic procedure and compared skin adhesive (SA) versus transcutaneous suture (TS). METHODS: A randomized, controlled, pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buchweitz, Olaf, Frye, Christian, Moeller, Claus Peter, Nugent, Wolfgang, Krueger, Eckart, Nugent, Andreas, Biel, Peter, Juergens, Sven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4887523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26428200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4474-5
_version_ 1782434740494663680
author Buchweitz, Olaf
Frye, Christian
Moeller, Claus Peter
Nugent, Wolfgang
Krueger, Eckart
Nugent, Andreas
Biel, Peter
Juergens, Sven
author_facet Buchweitz, Olaf
Frye, Christian
Moeller, Claus Peter
Nugent, Wolfgang
Krueger, Eckart
Nugent, Andreas
Biel, Peter
Juergens, Sven
author_sort Buchweitz, Olaf
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In an elective laparoscopic surgery, the cosmetic outcome becomes increasingly important. We conducted a study to evaluate the cosmetic outcome 3 months after a laparoscopic procedure and compared skin adhesive (SA) versus transcutaneous suture (TS). METHODS: A randomized, controlled, prospective study was conducted at a single study centre in Hamburg, Germany. Seventy-seven patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery with two lower abdominal port sites met the study requirements. It was decided randomly which port site would be closed with SA. The opposite site was closed with TS. Wounds were assessed after 7–12 days and after 3 months. Cosmetic outcome was measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS) completed by the patient, by the Hollander wound evaluation scale (HWES) and by the judgement of blinded investigators. RESULTS: Seventy-seven subjects were randomized. Complete data from the 3-month follow-up visit were available from 56 patients (72.7 %). The VAS scale ranged from 0 to 100 mm with “0” representing the best possible cosmetic outcome. Median satisfaction was 2 mm in the TS group and 3 mm in the SA group. The mean was high in both groups 4.6 (s = 13.1) versus 3.8 mm (s = 4.6). The outcome was neither clinically nor statistically significant. Cosmetic outcome was assessed by an investigator, and the HWES showed no difference. In regard to complications, no difference was found between SA and TS, either. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion this study demonstrated that closure of laparoscopic port-site wounds leads to equivalent outcomes whether SAs or TSs are used. Complications are rare in both methods. Thus, SAs seem to be a valid alternative to sutures in laparoscopic surgery. Registration site: www.clinicaltrials.gov. Registration number: NCT02179723. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4474-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4887523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48875232016-06-17 Cosmetic outcome of skin adhesives versus transcutaneous sutures in laparoscopic port-site wounds: a prospective randomized controlled trial Buchweitz, Olaf Frye, Christian Moeller, Claus Peter Nugent, Wolfgang Krueger, Eckart Nugent, Andreas Biel, Peter Juergens, Sven Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: In an elective laparoscopic surgery, the cosmetic outcome becomes increasingly important. We conducted a study to evaluate the cosmetic outcome 3 months after a laparoscopic procedure and compared skin adhesive (SA) versus transcutaneous suture (TS). METHODS: A randomized, controlled, prospective study was conducted at a single study centre in Hamburg, Germany. Seventy-seven patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery with two lower abdominal port sites met the study requirements. It was decided randomly which port site would be closed with SA. The opposite site was closed with TS. Wounds were assessed after 7–12 days and after 3 months. Cosmetic outcome was measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS) completed by the patient, by the Hollander wound evaluation scale (HWES) and by the judgement of blinded investigators. RESULTS: Seventy-seven subjects were randomized. Complete data from the 3-month follow-up visit were available from 56 patients (72.7 %). The VAS scale ranged from 0 to 100 mm with “0” representing the best possible cosmetic outcome. Median satisfaction was 2 mm in the TS group and 3 mm in the SA group. The mean was high in both groups 4.6 (s = 13.1) versus 3.8 mm (s = 4.6). The outcome was neither clinically nor statistically significant. Cosmetic outcome was assessed by an investigator, and the HWES showed no difference. In regard to complications, no difference was found between SA and TS, either. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion this study demonstrated that closure of laparoscopic port-site wounds leads to equivalent outcomes whether SAs or TSs are used. Complications are rare in both methods. Thus, SAs seem to be a valid alternative to sutures in laparoscopic surgery. Registration site: www.clinicaltrials.gov. Registration number: NCT02179723. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4474-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2015-10-01 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4887523/ /pubmed/26428200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4474-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Buchweitz, Olaf
Frye, Christian
Moeller, Claus Peter
Nugent, Wolfgang
Krueger, Eckart
Nugent, Andreas
Biel, Peter
Juergens, Sven
Cosmetic outcome of skin adhesives versus transcutaneous sutures in laparoscopic port-site wounds: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title Cosmetic outcome of skin adhesives versus transcutaneous sutures in laparoscopic port-site wounds: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full Cosmetic outcome of skin adhesives versus transcutaneous sutures in laparoscopic port-site wounds: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Cosmetic outcome of skin adhesives versus transcutaneous sutures in laparoscopic port-site wounds: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Cosmetic outcome of skin adhesives versus transcutaneous sutures in laparoscopic port-site wounds: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_short Cosmetic outcome of skin adhesives versus transcutaneous sutures in laparoscopic port-site wounds: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_sort cosmetic outcome of skin adhesives versus transcutaneous sutures in laparoscopic port-site wounds: a prospective randomized controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4887523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26428200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4474-5
work_keys_str_mv AT buchweitzolaf cosmeticoutcomeofskinadhesivesversustranscutaneoussuturesinlaparoscopicportsitewoundsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fryechristian cosmeticoutcomeofskinadhesivesversustranscutaneoussuturesinlaparoscopicportsitewoundsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT moellerclauspeter cosmeticoutcomeofskinadhesivesversustranscutaneoussuturesinlaparoscopicportsitewoundsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nugentwolfgang cosmeticoutcomeofskinadhesivesversustranscutaneoussuturesinlaparoscopicportsitewoundsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kruegereckart cosmeticoutcomeofskinadhesivesversustranscutaneoussuturesinlaparoscopicportsitewoundsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nugentandreas cosmeticoutcomeofskinadhesivesversustranscutaneoussuturesinlaparoscopicportsitewoundsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bielpeter cosmeticoutcomeofskinadhesivesversustranscutaneoussuturesinlaparoscopicportsitewoundsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT juergenssven cosmeticoutcomeofskinadhesivesversustranscutaneoussuturesinlaparoscopicportsitewoundsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial