Cargando…

Validity, reliability and support for implementation of independence-scaled procedural assessment in laparoscopic surgery

BACKGROUND: There is no widely used method to evaluate procedure-specific laparoscopic skills. The first aim of this study was to develop a procedure-based assessment method. The second aim was to compare its validity, reliability and feasibility with currently available global rating scales (GRSs)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kramp, Kelvin H., van Det, Marc J., Veeger, Nic J. G. M., Pierie, Jean-Pierre E. N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4887524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26416369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4254-2
_version_ 1782434740718010368
author Kramp, Kelvin H.
van Det, Marc J.
Veeger, Nic J. G. M.
Pierie, Jean-Pierre E. N.
author_facet Kramp, Kelvin H.
van Det, Marc J.
Veeger, Nic J. G. M.
Pierie, Jean-Pierre E. N.
author_sort Kramp, Kelvin H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is no widely used method to evaluate procedure-specific laparoscopic skills. The first aim of this study was to develop a procedure-based assessment method. The second aim was to compare its validity, reliability and feasibility with currently available global rating scales (GRSs). METHODS: An independence-scaled procedural assessment was created by linking the procedural key steps of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy to an independence scale. Subtitled and blinded videos of a novice, an intermediate and an almost competent trainee, were evaluated with GRSs (OSATS and GOALS) and the independence-scaled procedural assessment by seven surgeons, three senior trainees and six scrub nurses. Participants received a short introduction to the GRSs and independence-scaled procedural assessment before assessment. The validity was estimated with the Friedman and Wilcoxon test and the reliability with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). A questionnaire was used to evaluate user opinion. RESULTS: Independence-scaled procedural assessment and GRS scores improved significantly with surgical experience (OSATS p = 0.001, GOALS p < 0.001, independence-scaled procedural assessment p < 0.001). The ICCs of the OSATS, GOALS and independence-scaled procedural assessment were 0.78, 0.74 and 0.84, respectively, among surgeons. The ICCs increased when the ratings of scrub nurses were added to those of the surgeons. The independence-scaled procedural assessment was not considered more of an administrative burden than the GRSs (p = 0.692). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: A procedural assessment created by combining procedural key steps to an independence scale is a valid, reliable and acceptable assessment instrument in surgery. In contrast to the GRSs, the reliability of the independence-scaled procedural assessment exceeded the threshold of 0.8, indicating that it can also be used for summative assessment. It furthermore seems that scrub nurses can assess the operative competence of surgical trainees.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4887524
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48875242016-06-17 Validity, reliability and support for implementation of independence-scaled procedural assessment in laparoscopic surgery Kramp, Kelvin H. van Det, Marc J. Veeger, Nic J. G. M. Pierie, Jean-Pierre E. N. Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: There is no widely used method to evaluate procedure-specific laparoscopic skills. The first aim of this study was to develop a procedure-based assessment method. The second aim was to compare its validity, reliability and feasibility with currently available global rating scales (GRSs). METHODS: An independence-scaled procedural assessment was created by linking the procedural key steps of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy to an independence scale. Subtitled and blinded videos of a novice, an intermediate and an almost competent trainee, were evaluated with GRSs (OSATS and GOALS) and the independence-scaled procedural assessment by seven surgeons, three senior trainees and six scrub nurses. Participants received a short introduction to the GRSs and independence-scaled procedural assessment before assessment. The validity was estimated with the Friedman and Wilcoxon test and the reliability with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). A questionnaire was used to evaluate user opinion. RESULTS: Independence-scaled procedural assessment and GRS scores improved significantly with surgical experience (OSATS p = 0.001, GOALS p < 0.001, independence-scaled procedural assessment p < 0.001). The ICCs of the OSATS, GOALS and independence-scaled procedural assessment were 0.78, 0.74 and 0.84, respectively, among surgeons. The ICCs increased when the ratings of scrub nurses were added to those of the surgeons. The independence-scaled procedural assessment was not considered more of an administrative burden than the GRSs (p = 0.692). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: A procedural assessment created by combining procedural key steps to an independence scale is a valid, reliable and acceptable assessment instrument in surgery. In contrast to the GRSs, the reliability of the independence-scaled procedural assessment exceeded the threshold of 0.8, indicating that it can also be used for summative assessment. It furthermore seems that scrub nurses can assess the operative competence of surgical trainees. Springer US 2015-09-28 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4887524/ /pubmed/26416369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4254-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Kramp, Kelvin H.
van Det, Marc J.
Veeger, Nic J. G. M.
Pierie, Jean-Pierre E. N.
Validity, reliability and support for implementation of independence-scaled procedural assessment in laparoscopic surgery
title Validity, reliability and support for implementation of independence-scaled procedural assessment in laparoscopic surgery
title_full Validity, reliability and support for implementation of independence-scaled procedural assessment in laparoscopic surgery
title_fullStr Validity, reliability and support for implementation of independence-scaled procedural assessment in laparoscopic surgery
title_full_unstemmed Validity, reliability and support for implementation of independence-scaled procedural assessment in laparoscopic surgery
title_short Validity, reliability and support for implementation of independence-scaled procedural assessment in laparoscopic surgery
title_sort validity, reliability and support for implementation of independence-scaled procedural assessment in laparoscopic surgery
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4887524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26416369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4254-2
work_keys_str_mv AT krampkelvinh validityreliabilityandsupportforimplementationofindependencescaledproceduralassessmentinlaparoscopicsurgery
AT vandetmarcj validityreliabilityandsupportforimplementationofindependencescaledproceduralassessmentinlaparoscopicsurgery
AT veegernicjgm validityreliabilityandsupportforimplementationofindependencescaledproceduralassessmentinlaparoscopicsurgery
AT pieriejeanpierreen validityreliabilityandsupportforimplementationofindependencescaledproceduralassessmentinlaparoscopicsurgery