Cargando…

Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Comparison of Ab Interno and Ab Externo Intraocular Lens Scleral Fixation

Purpose. To compare ab interno and ab externo scleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses (PCIOL) using ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). Methods. Randomized patients underwent ab externo or ab interno scleral fixation of a PCIOL. Ultrasound biomicroscopy was performed 3 to 6 months posto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Horiguchi, Lie, Garcia, Patricia Novita, Malavazzi, Gustavo Ricci, Allemann, Norma, Gomes, Rachel L. R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4887626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27293878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9375091
_version_ 1782434756519002112
author Horiguchi, Lie
Garcia, Patricia Novita
Malavazzi, Gustavo Ricci
Allemann, Norma
Gomes, Rachel L. R.
author_facet Horiguchi, Lie
Garcia, Patricia Novita
Malavazzi, Gustavo Ricci
Allemann, Norma
Gomes, Rachel L. R.
author_sort Horiguchi, Lie
collection PubMed
description Purpose. To compare ab interno and ab externo scleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses (PCIOL) using ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). Methods. Randomized patients underwent ab externo or ab interno scleral fixation of a PCIOL. Ultrasound biomicroscopy was performed 3 to 6 months postoperatively, to determine PCIOL centration, IOL distance to the iris at 12, 3, 6, and 9 hours, and haptics placement in relation to the ciliary sulcus. Results. Fifteen patients were enrolled in the study. The ab externo technique was used in 7 eyes (46.6%) and the ab interno in 8 eyes (53.3%). In the ab externo technique, 14 haptics were located: 4 (28.57%) in the ciliary sulcus; 2 (14.28%) anterior to the sulcus; and 8 (57.14%) posterior to the sulcus, 6 in the ciliary body and 2 posterior to the ciliary body. In the ab interno group, 4 haptics (25.0%) were in the ciliary sulcus, 2 (12.50%) anterior to the sulcus, and 10 (75.0%) posterior to the sulcus, 4 in the ciliary body and 6 posterior to the ciliary body. Conclusions. Ab externo and ab interno scleral fixation techniques presented similar results in haptic placement. Ab externo technique presented higher vertical tilt when compared to the ab interno.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4887626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48876262016-06-12 Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Comparison of Ab Interno and Ab Externo Intraocular Lens Scleral Fixation Horiguchi, Lie Garcia, Patricia Novita Malavazzi, Gustavo Ricci Allemann, Norma Gomes, Rachel L. R. J Ophthalmol Clinical Study Purpose. To compare ab interno and ab externo scleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses (PCIOL) using ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). Methods. Randomized patients underwent ab externo or ab interno scleral fixation of a PCIOL. Ultrasound biomicroscopy was performed 3 to 6 months postoperatively, to determine PCIOL centration, IOL distance to the iris at 12, 3, 6, and 9 hours, and haptics placement in relation to the ciliary sulcus. Results. Fifteen patients were enrolled in the study. The ab externo technique was used in 7 eyes (46.6%) and the ab interno in 8 eyes (53.3%). In the ab externo technique, 14 haptics were located: 4 (28.57%) in the ciliary sulcus; 2 (14.28%) anterior to the sulcus; and 8 (57.14%) posterior to the sulcus, 6 in the ciliary body and 2 posterior to the ciliary body. In the ab interno group, 4 haptics (25.0%) were in the ciliary sulcus, 2 (12.50%) anterior to the sulcus, and 10 (75.0%) posterior to the sulcus, 4 in the ciliary body and 6 posterior to the ciliary body. Conclusions. Ab externo and ab interno scleral fixation techniques presented similar results in haptic placement. Ab externo technique presented higher vertical tilt when compared to the ab interno. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4887626/ /pubmed/27293878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9375091 Text en Copyright © 2016 Lie Horiguchi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Horiguchi, Lie
Garcia, Patricia Novita
Malavazzi, Gustavo Ricci
Allemann, Norma
Gomes, Rachel L. R.
Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Comparison of Ab Interno and Ab Externo Intraocular Lens Scleral Fixation
title Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Comparison of Ab Interno and Ab Externo Intraocular Lens Scleral Fixation
title_full Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Comparison of Ab Interno and Ab Externo Intraocular Lens Scleral Fixation
title_fullStr Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Comparison of Ab Interno and Ab Externo Intraocular Lens Scleral Fixation
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Comparison of Ab Interno and Ab Externo Intraocular Lens Scleral Fixation
title_short Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Comparison of Ab Interno and Ab Externo Intraocular Lens Scleral Fixation
title_sort ultrasound biomicroscopy comparison of ab interno and ab externo intraocular lens scleral fixation
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4887626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27293878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9375091
work_keys_str_mv AT horiguchilie ultrasoundbiomicroscopycomparisonofabinternoandabexternointraocularlensscleralfixation
AT garciapatricianovita ultrasoundbiomicroscopycomparisonofabinternoandabexternointraocularlensscleralfixation
AT malavazzigustavoricci ultrasoundbiomicroscopycomparisonofabinternoandabexternointraocularlensscleralfixation
AT allemannnorma ultrasoundbiomicroscopycomparisonofabinternoandabexternointraocularlensscleralfixation
AT gomesrachellr ultrasoundbiomicroscopycomparisonofabinternoandabexternointraocularlensscleralfixation