Cargando…
Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Comparison of Ab Interno and Ab Externo Intraocular Lens Scleral Fixation
Purpose. To compare ab interno and ab externo scleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses (PCIOL) using ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). Methods. Randomized patients underwent ab externo or ab interno scleral fixation of a PCIOL. Ultrasound biomicroscopy was performed 3 to 6 months posto...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4887626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27293878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9375091 |
_version_ | 1782434756519002112 |
---|---|
author | Horiguchi, Lie Garcia, Patricia Novita Malavazzi, Gustavo Ricci Allemann, Norma Gomes, Rachel L. R. |
author_facet | Horiguchi, Lie Garcia, Patricia Novita Malavazzi, Gustavo Ricci Allemann, Norma Gomes, Rachel L. R. |
author_sort | Horiguchi, Lie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose. To compare ab interno and ab externo scleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses (PCIOL) using ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). Methods. Randomized patients underwent ab externo or ab interno scleral fixation of a PCIOL. Ultrasound biomicroscopy was performed 3 to 6 months postoperatively, to determine PCIOL centration, IOL distance to the iris at 12, 3, 6, and 9 hours, and haptics placement in relation to the ciliary sulcus. Results. Fifteen patients were enrolled in the study. The ab externo technique was used in 7 eyes (46.6%) and the ab interno in 8 eyes (53.3%). In the ab externo technique, 14 haptics were located: 4 (28.57%) in the ciliary sulcus; 2 (14.28%) anterior to the sulcus; and 8 (57.14%) posterior to the sulcus, 6 in the ciliary body and 2 posterior to the ciliary body. In the ab interno group, 4 haptics (25.0%) were in the ciliary sulcus, 2 (12.50%) anterior to the sulcus, and 10 (75.0%) posterior to the sulcus, 4 in the ciliary body and 6 posterior to the ciliary body. Conclusions. Ab externo and ab interno scleral fixation techniques presented similar results in haptic placement. Ab externo technique presented higher vertical tilt when compared to the ab interno. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4887626 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48876262016-06-12 Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Comparison of Ab Interno and Ab Externo Intraocular Lens Scleral Fixation Horiguchi, Lie Garcia, Patricia Novita Malavazzi, Gustavo Ricci Allemann, Norma Gomes, Rachel L. R. J Ophthalmol Clinical Study Purpose. To compare ab interno and ab externo scleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses (PCIOL) using ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). Methods. Randomized patients underwent ab externo or ab interno scleral fixation of a PCIOL. Ultrasound biomicroscopy was performed 3 to 6 months postoperatively, to determine PCIOL centration, IOL distance to the iris at 12, 3, 6, and 9 hours, and haptics placement in relation to the ciliary sulcus. Results. Fifteen patients were enrolled in the study. The ab externo technique was used in 7 eyes (46.6%) and the ab interno in 8 eyes (53.3%). In the ab externo technique, 14 haptics were located: 4 (28.57%) in the ciliary sulcus; 2 (14.28%) anterior to the sulcus; and 8 (57.14%) posterior to the sulcus, 6 in the ciliary body and 2 posterior to the ciliary body. In the ab interno group, 4 haptics (25.0%) were in the ciliary sulcus, 2 (12.50%) anterior to the sulcus, and 10 (75.0%) posterior to the sulcus, 4 in the ciliary body and 6 posterior to the ciliary body. Conclusions. Ab externo and ab interno scleral fixation techniques presented similar results in haptic placement. Ab externo technique presented higher vertical tilt when compared to the ab interno. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4887626/ /pubmed/27293878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9375091 Text en Copyright © 2016 Lie Horiguchi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Horiguchi, Lie Garcia, Patricia Novita Malavazzi, Gustavo Ricci Allemann, Norma Gomes, Rachel L. R. Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Comparison of Ab Interno and Ab Externo Intraocular Lens Scleral Fixation |
title | Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Comparison of Ab Interno and Ab Externo Intraocular Lens Scleral Fixation |
title_full | Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Comparison of Ab Interno and Ab Externo Intraocular Lens Scleral Fixation |
title_fullStr | Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Comparison of Ab Interno and Ab Externo Intraocular Lens Scleral Fixation |
title_full_unstemmed | Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Comparison of Ab Interno and Ab Externo Intraocular Lens Scleral Fixation |
title_short | Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Comparison of Ab Interno and Ab Externo Intraocular Lens Scleral Fixation |
title_sort | ultrasound biomicroscopy comparison of ab interno and ab externo intraocular lens scleral fixation |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4887626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27293878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9375091 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT horiguchilie ultrasoundbiomicroscopycomparisonofabinternoandabexternointraocularlensscleralfixation AT garciapatricianovita ultrasoundbiomicroscopycomparisonofabinternoandabexternointraocularlensscleralfixation AT malavazzigustavoricci ultrasoundbiomicroscopycomparisonofabinternoandabexternointraocularlensscleralfixation AT allemannnorma ultrasoundbiomicroscopycomparisonofabinternoandabexternointraocularlensscleralfixation AT gomesrachellr ultrasoundbiomicroscopycomparisonofabinternoandabexternointraocularlensscleralfixation |