Cargando…

Applying Multiple Methods to Comprehensively Evaluate a Patient Portal’s Effectiveness to Convey Information to Patients

BACKGROUND: Patient portals have yet to achieve their full potential for enhancing health communication and improving health outcomes. Although the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in the United States mandates the utilization of patient portals, and usage continues to rise, their impact h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alpert, Jordan M, Krist, Alex H, Aycock, Rebecca A, Kreps, Gary L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4887660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27188953
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5451
_version_ 1782434764230230016
author Alpert, Jordan M
Krist, Alex H
Aycock, Rebecca A
Kreps, Gary L
author_facet Alpert, Jordan M
Krist, Alex H
Aycock, Rebecca A
Kreps, Gary L
author_sort Alpert, Jordan M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient portals have yet to achieve their full potential for enhancing health communication and improving health outcomes. Although the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in the United States mandates the utilization of patient portals, and usage continues to rise, their impact has not been as profound as anticipated. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our case study was to evaluate how well portals convey information to patients. To demonstrate how multiple methodologies could be used to evaluate and improve the design of patient-centered portals, we conducted an in-depth evaluation of an exemplar patient-centered portal designed to promote preventive care to consumers. METHODS: We used 31 critical incident patient interviews, 2 clinician focus groups, and a thematic content analysis to understand patients’ and clinicians’ perspectives, as well as theoretical understandings of the portal’s use. RESULTS: We gathered over 140 critical incidents, 71.8% (102/142) negative and 28.2% (40/142) positive. Positive incident categories were (1) instant medical information access, (2) clear health information, and (3) patient vigilance. Negative incident categories were (1) standardized content, (2) desire for direct communication, (3) website functionality, and (4) difficulty interpreting laboratory data. Thematic analysis of the portal’s immediacy resulted in high scores in the attributes enhances understanding (18/23, 78%), personalization (18/24, 75%), and motivates behavior (17/24, 71%), but low levels of interactivity (7/24, 29%) and engagement (2/24, 8%). Two overarching themes emerged to guide portal refinements: (1) communication can be improved with directness and interactivity and (2) perceived personalization must be greater to engage patients. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that simple modifications, such as increased interactivity and personalized messages, can make portals customized, robust, easily accessible, and trusted information sources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4887660
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher JMIR Publications Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48876602016-06-13 Applying Multiple Methods to Comprehensively Evaluate a Patient Portal’s Effectiveness to Convey Information to Patients Alpert, Jordan M Krist, Alex H Aycock, Rebecca A Kreps, Gary L J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Patient portals have yet to achieve their full potential for enhancing health communication and improving health outcomes. Although the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in the United States mandates the utilization of patient portals, and usage continues to rise, their impact has not been as profound as anticipated. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our case study was to evaluate how well portals convey information to patients. To demonstrate how multiple methodologies could be used to evaluate and improve the design of patient-centered portals, we conducted an in-depth evaluation of an exemplar patient-centered portal designed to promote preventive care to consumers. METHODS: We used 31 critical incident patient interviews, 2 clinician focus groups, and a thematic content analysis to understand patients’ and clinicians’ perspectives, as well as theoretical understandings of the portal’s use. RESULTS: We gathered over 140 critical incidents, 71.8% (102/142) negative and 28.2% (40/142) positive. Positive incident categories were (1) instant medical information access, (2) clear health information, and (3) patient vigilance. Negative incident categories were (1) standardized content, (2) desire for direct communication, (3) website functionality, and (4) difficulty interpreting laboratory data. Thematic analysis of the portal’s immediacy resulted in high scores in the attributes enhances understanding (18/23, 78%), personalization (18/24, 75%), and motivates behavior (17/24, 71%), but low levels of interactivity (7/24, 29%) and engagement (2/24, 8%). Two overarching themes emerged to guide portal refinements: (1) communication can be improved with directness and interactivity and (2) perceived personalization must be greater to engage patients. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that simple modifications, such as increased interactivity and personalized messages, can make portals customized, robust, easily accessible, and trusted information sources. JMIR Publications Inc. 2016-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4887660/ /pubmed/27188953 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5451 Text en ©Jordan M Alpert, Alex H Krist, Rebecca A Aycock, Gary L Kreps. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 17.05.2016. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Alpert, Jordan M
Krist, Alex H
Aycock, Rebecca A
Kreps, Gary L
Applying Multiple Methods to Comprehensively Evaluate a Patient Portal’s Effectiveness to Convey Information to Patients
title Applying Multiple Methods to Comprehensively Evaluate a Patient Portal’s Effectiveness to Convey Information to Patients
title_full Applying Multiple Methods to Comprehensively Evaluate a Patient Portal’s Effectiveness to Convey Information to Patients
title_fullStr Applying Multiple Methods to Comprehensively Evaluate a Patient Portal’s Effectiveness to Convey Information to Patients
title_full_unstemmed Applying Multiple Methods to Comprehensively Evaluate a Patient Portal’s Effectiveness to Convey Information to Patients
title_short Applying Multiple Methods to Comprehensively Evaluate a Patient Portal’s Effectiveness to Convey Information to Patients
title_sort applying multiple methods to comprehensively evaluate a patient portal’s effectiveness to convey information to patients
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4887660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27188953
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5451
work_keys_str_mv AT alpertjordanm applyingmultiplemethodstocomprehensivelyevaluateapatientportalseffectivenesstoconveyinformationtopatients
AT kristalexh applyingmultiplemethodstocomprehensivelyevaluateapatientportalseffectivenesstoconveyinformationtopatients
AT aycockrebeccaa applyingmultiplemethodstocomprehensivelyevaluateapatientportalseffectivenesstoconveyinformationtopatients
AT krepsgaryl applyingmultiplemethodstocomprehensivelyevaluateapatientportalseffectivenesstoconveyinformationtopatients