Cargando…

Little evidence for community treatment orders – a battle fought with heavy weapons

This editorial discusses the pros and cons of community treatment orders (CTOs) from the perspective of community general adult psychiatry. There is little scientific evidence supporting the application of CTOs. Preconditions of a CTO to work are likely to be met by few patients. The time for the ap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heun, Reinhard, Dave, Subodh, Rowlands, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of Psychiatrists 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4887726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27280029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.115.052373
_version_ 1782434769744691200
author Heun, Reinhard
Dave, Subodh
Rowlands, Paul
author_facet Heun, Reinhard
Dave, Subodh
Rowlands, Paul
author_sort Heun, Reinhard
collection PubMed
description This editorial discusses the pros and cons of community treatment orders (CTOs) from the perspective of community general adult psychiatry. There is little scientific evidence supporting the application of CTOs. Preconditions of a CTO to work are likely to be met by few patients. The time for the application of a CTO may be better spent for patient-centred care until there is sufficient new and robust evidence that identifies the patients that might profit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4887726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Royal College of Psychiatrists
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48877262016-06-08 Little evidence for community treatment orders – a battle fought with heavy weapons Heun, Reinhard Dave, Subodh Rowlands, Paul BJPsych Bull Editorials This editorial discusses the pros and cons of community treatment orders (CTOs) from the perspective of community general adult psychiatry. There is little scientific evidence supporting the application of CTOs. Preconditions of a CTO to work are likely to be met by few patients. The time for the application of a CTO may be better spent for patient-centred care until there is sufficient new and robust evidence that identifies the patients that might profit. Royal College of Psychiatrists 2016-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4887726/ /pubmed/27280029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.115.052373 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open-access article published by the Royal College of Psychiatrists and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Editorials
Heun, Reinhard
Dave, Subodh
Rowlands, Paul
Little evidence for community treatment orders – a battle fought with heavy weapons
title Little evidence for community treatment orders – a battle fought with heavy weapons
title_full Little evidence for community treatment orders – a battle fought with heavy weapons
title_fullStr Little evidence for community treatment orders – a battle fought with heavy weapons
title_full_unstemmed Little evidence for community treatment orders – a battle fought with heavy weapons
title_short Little evidence for community treatment orders – a battle fought with heavy weapons
title_sort little evidence for community treatment orders – a battle fought with heavy weapons
topic Editorials
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4887726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27280029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.115.052373
work_keys_str_mv AT heunreinhard littleevidenceforcommunitytreatmentordersabattlefoughtwithheavyweapons
AT davesubodh littleevidenceforcommunitytreatmentordersabattlefoughtwithheavyweapons
AT rowlandspaul littleevidenceforcommunitytreatmentordersabattlefoughtwithheavyweapons