Cargando…

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Autologous Hamstring: Can Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Accurately Predict Graft Diameter?

BACKGROUND: Recent clinical investigations have identified inadequate autograft hamstring graft diameter (<8 mm) to be predictive of failure after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study was to determine the utility of preoperative m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grawe, Brian M., Williams, Phillip N., Burge, Alissa, Voigt, Marcia, Altchek, David W., Hannafin, Jo A., Allen, Answorth A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
25
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4887876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27294166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116646360
_version_ 1782434789387665408
author Grawe, Brian M.
Williams, Phillip N.
Burge, Alissa
Voigt, Marcia
Altchek, David W.
Hannafin, Jo A.
Allen, Answorth A.
author_facet Grawe, Brian M.
Williams, Phillip N.
Burge, Alissa
Voigt, Marcia
Altchek, David W.
Hannafin, Jo A.
Allen, Answorth A.
author_sort Grawe, Brian M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent clinical investigations have identified inadequate autograft hamstring graft diameter (<8 mm) to be predictive of failure after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study was to determine the utility of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) variables of the hamstring tendons for the prediction of graft diameter at the time of surgery. The hypothesis was that cross-sectional area (CSA) of the hamstring tendon measured on MRI could accurately predict graft diameter, and threshold measurements could be established to predict graft diameter at the time of surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A total of 84 consecutive skeletally mature patients prospectively enrolled in our ACL reconstruction patient registry were identified for study purposes. Patients were included if they underwent an MRI of the affected knee at our institution prior to ACL reconstruction with hamstring (HT) autograft. Graft preparation was performed via a standard quadrupled hamstring technique after harvesting both the gracilis and semitendinosus (4-GST). The smallest diameter end of the HT autograft was then utilized for measurement analysis. Total CSA was calculated for both hamstring tendons using the “region of interest tool” on the corresponding proton density–weighted axial image of the knee at the widest condylar dimension. Three independent reviewers measured the MRI scans so that intra- and interrater reliability of the measurements could be determined. A trend analysis was then undertaken to establish correlations between the MRI CSA and graft diameter. Predictive analysis was then performed to establish threshold MRI measurement values for specific graft diameters and determine whether any patient-specific factors would affect graft diameter (age, sex, and body mass index). RESULTS: Mean patient age at the time of surgery was 36 years (range, 11-57 years). Intra- and interrater reliability measurements achieved near-perfect agreement for CSA measurements, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of 0.994 and 0.932, respectively. Trend analysis demonstrated that increasing CSA correlated well with increasing overall diameter of the graft (P < .001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to evaluate threshold CSA measurements for various graft diameters. Maximum sensitivity values of 21.64, 25.25, and 28.256 mm(2) were established for the respective graft diameters of 8, 9, and 10 mm in the 4-GST group. Independent patient factors of younger age, shorter stature, and female sex were significantly associated with graft diameter (P = .019, .034, and .028, respectively). CONCLUSION: Preoperative MRI can be used to accurately predict quadrupled hamstring autograft diameter at the time of surgery. A total cross-sectional area of >22 mm(2) can reliably provide a graft diameter of >8 mm at the time of surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4887876
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48878762016-06-10 Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Autologous Hamstring: Can Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Accurately Predict Graft Diameter? Grawe, Brian M. Williams, Phillip N. Burge, Alissa Voigt, Marcia Altchek, David W. Hannafin, Jo A. Allen, Answorth A. Orthop J Sports Med 25 BACKGROUND: Recent clinical investigations have identified inadequate autograft hamstring graft diameter (<8 mm) to be predictive of failure after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study was to determine the utility of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) variables of the hamstring tendons for the prediction of graft diameter at the time of surgery. The hypothesis was that cross-sectional area (CSA) of the hamstring tendon measured on MRI could accurately predict graft diameter, and threshold measurements could be established to predict graft diameter at the time of surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A total of 84 consecutive skeletally mature patients prospectively enrolled in our ACL reconstruction patient registry were identified for study purposes. Patients were included if they underwent an MRI of the affected knee at our institution prior to ACL reconstruction with hamstring (HT) autograft. Graft preparation was performed via a standard quadrupled hamstring technique after harvesting both the gracilis and semitendinosus (4-GST). The smallest diameter end of the HT autograft was then utilized for measurement analysis. Total CSA was calculated for both hamstring tendons using the “region of interest tool” on the corresponding proton density–weighted axial image of the knee at the widest condylar dimension. Three independent reviewers measured the MRI scans so that intra- and interrater reliability of the measurements could be determined. A trend analysis was then undertaken to establish correlations between the MRI CSA and graft diameter. Predictive analysis was then performed to establish threshold MRI measurement values for specific graft diameters and determine whether any patient-specific factors would affect graft diameter (age, sex, and body mass index). RESULTS: Mean patient age at the time of surgery was 36 years (range, 11-57 years). Intra- and interrater reliability measurements achieved near-perfect agreement for CSA measurements, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of 0.994 and 0.932, respectively. Trend analysis demonstrated that increasing CSA correlated well with increasing overall diameter of the graft (P < .001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to evaluate threshold CSA measurements for various graft diameters. Maximum sensitivity values of 21.64, 25.25, and 28.256 mm(2) were established for the respective graft diameters of 8, 9, and 10 mm in the 4-GST group. Independent patient factors of younger age, shorter stature, and female sex were significantly associated with graft diameter (P = .019, .034, and .028, respectively). CONCLUSION: Preoperative MRI can be used to accurately predict quadrupled hamstring autograft diameter at the time of surgery. A total cross-sectional area of >22 mm(2) can reliably provide a graft diameter of >8 mm at the time of surgery. SAGE Publications 2016-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4887876/ /pubmed/27294166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116646360 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle 25
Grawe, Brian M.
Williams, Phillip N.
Burge, Alissa
Voigt, Marcia
Altchek, David W.
Hannafin, Jo A.
Allen, Answorth A.
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Autologous Hamstring: Can Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Accurately Predict Graft Diameter?
title Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Autologous Hamstring: Can Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Accurately Predict Graft Diameter?
title_full Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Autologous Hamstring: Can Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Accurately Predict Graft Diameter?
title_fullStr Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Autologous Hamstring: Can Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Accurately Predict Graft Diameter?
title_full_unstemmed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Autologous Hamstring: Can Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Accurately Predict Graft Diameter?
title_short Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Autologous Hamstring: Can Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Accurately Predict Graft Diameter?
title_sort anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autologous hamstring: can preoperative magnetic resonance imaging accurately predict graft diameter?
topic 25
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4887876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27294166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116646360
work_keys_str_mv AT grawebrianm anteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithautologoushamstringcanpreoperativemagneticresonanceimagingaccuratelypredictgraftdiameter
AT williamsphillipn anteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithautologoushamstringcanpreoperativemagneticresonanceimagingaccuratelypredictgraftdiameter
AT burgealissa anteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithautologoushamstringcanpreoperativemagneticresonanceimagingaccuratelypredictgraftdiameter
AT voigtmarcia anteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithautologoushamstringcanpreoperativemagneticresonanceimagingaccuratelypredictgraftdiameter
AT altchekdavidw anteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithautologoushamstringcanpreoperativemagneticresonanceimagingaccuratelypredictgraftdiameter
AT hannafinjoa anteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithautologoushamstringcanpreoperativemagneticresonanceimagingaccuratelypredictgraftdiameter
AT allenanswortha anteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithautologoushamstringcanpreoperativemagneticresonanceimagingaccuratelypredictgraftdiameter