Cargando…
Psychology, replication & beyond
Modern psychology is apparently in crisis and the prevailing view is that this partly reflects an inability to replicate past findings. If a crisis does exists, then it is some kind of ‘chronic’ crisis, as psychologists have been censuring themselves over replicability for decades. While the debate...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4888260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27251381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-016-0135-2 |
_version_ | 1782434835860553728 |
---|---|
author | Laws, Keith R. |
author_facet | Laws, Keith R. |
author_sort | Laws, Keith R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Modern psychology is apparently in crisis and the prevailing view is that this partly reflects an inability to replicate past findings. If a crisis does exists, then it is some kind of ‘chronic’ crisis, as psychologists have been censuring themselves over replicability for decades. While the debate in psychology is not new, the lack of progress across the decades is disappointing. Recently though, we have seen a veritable surfeit of debate alongside multiple orchestrated and well-publicised replication initiatives. The spotlight is being shone on certain areas and although not everyone agrees on how we should interpret the outcomes, the debate is happening and impassioned. The issue of reproducibility occupies a central place in our whig history of psychology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4888260 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48882602016-06-02 Psychology, replication & beyond Laws, Keith R. BMC Psychol Editorial Modern psychology is apparently in crisis and the prevailing view is that this partly reflects an inability to replicate past findings. If a crisis does exists, then it is some kind of ‘chronic’ crisis, as psychologists have been censuring themselves over replicability for decades. While the debate in psychology is not new, the lack of progress across the decades is disappointing. Recently though, we have seen a veritable surfeit of debate alongside multiple orchestrated and well-publicised replication initiatives. The spotlight is being shone on certain areas and although not everyone agrees on how we should interpret the outcomes, the debate is happening and impassioned. The issue of reproducibility occupies a central place in our whig history of psychology. BioMed Central 2016-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4888260/ /pubmed/27251381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-016-0135-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Editorial Laws, Keith R. Psychology, replication & beyond |
title | Psychology, replication & beyond |
title_full | Psychology, replication & beyond |
title_fullStr | Psychology, replication & beyond |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychology, replication & beyond |
title_short | Psychology, replication & beyond |
title_sort | psychology, replication & beyond |
topic | Editorial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4888260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27251381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-016-0135-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lawskeithr psychologyreplicationbeyond |