Cargando…

Psychology, replication & beyond

Modern psychology is apparently in crisis and the prevailing view is that this partly reflects an inability to replicate past findings. If a crisis does exists, then it is some kind of ‘chronic’ crisis, as psychologists have been censuring themselves over replicability for decades. While the debate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Laws, Keith R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4888260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27251381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-016-0135-2
_version_ 1782434835860553728
author Laws, Keith R.
author_facet Laws, Keith R.
author_sort Laws, Keith R.
collection PubMed
description Modern psychology is apparently in crisis and the prevailing view is that this partly reflects an inability to replicate past findings. If a crisis does exists, then it is some kind of ‘chronic’ crisis, as psychologists have been censuring themselves over replicability for decades. While the debate in psychology is not new, the lack of progress across the decades is disappointing. Recently though, we have seen a veritable surfeit of debate alongside multiple orchestrated and well-publicised replication initiatives. The spotlight is being shone on certain areas and although not everyone agrees on how we should interpret the outcomes, the debate is happening and impassioned. The issue of reproducibility occupies a central place in our whig history of psychology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4888260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48882602016-06-02 Psychology, replication & beyond Laws, Keith R. BMC Psychol Editorial Modern psychology is apparently in crisis and the prevailing view is that this partly reflects an inability to replicate past findings. If a crisis does exists, then it is some kind of ‘chronic’ crisis, as psychologists have been censuring themselves over replicability for decades. While the debate in psychology is not new, the lack of progress across the decades is disappointing. Recently though, we have seen a veritable surfeit of debate alongside multiple orchestrated and well-publicised replication initiatives. The spotlight is being shone on certain areas and although not everyone agrees on how we should interpret the outcomes, the debate is happening and impassioned. The issue of reproducibility occupies a central place in our whig history of psychology. BioMed Central 2016-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4888260/ /pubmed/27251381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-016-0135-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Editorial
Laws, Keith R.
Psychology, replication & beyond
title Psychology, replication & beyond
title_full Psychology, replication & beyond
title_fullStr Psychology, replication & beyond
title_full_unstemmed Psychology, replication & beyond
title_short Psychology, replication & beyond
title_sort psychology, replication & beyond
topic Editorial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4888260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27251381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-016-0135-2
work_keys_str_mv AT lawskeithr psychologyreplicationbeyond