Cargando…
Coexistence of central nucleus, cores, and rods: Diagnostic relevance
BACKGROUND: Congenital myopathies (CMs) though considered distinct disorders, simultaneous occurrence of central nucleus, nemaline rods, and cores in the same biopsy are scarcely reported. OBJECTIVE: A retrospective reassessment of cases diagnosed as CMs to look for multiple pathologies missed, if a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4888682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27293330 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-2327.176861 |
_version_ | 1782434888942616576 |
---|---|
author | Dhinakaran, Sathiyabama Kumar, Rashmi Santhosh Thakkar, Ravindra Narayanappa, Gayathri |
author_facet | Dhinakaran, Sathiyabama Kumar, Rashmi Santhosh Thakkar, Ravindra Narayanappa, Gayathri |
author_sort | Dhinakaran, Sathiyabama |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Congenital myopathies (CMs) though considered distinct disorders, simultaneous occurrence of central nucleus, nemaline rods, and cores in the same biopsy are scarcely reported. OBJECTIVE: A retrospective reassessment of cases diagnosed as CMs to look for multiple pathologies missed, if any, during the initial diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Enzyme histochemical, and immunohistochemical-stained slides from 125 cases diagnosed as congenital myopathy were reassessed. RESULTS: The study revealed 15 cases (12%) of congenital myopathy with more than one morphological feature. Central nucleus with cores (n = 11), central nucleus, nemaline rods and cores (n = 3), and nemaline rods with cores (n = 1). 4/11 cases were diagnosed as centronuclear myopathy (CNM) in the first instance; in addition, cores were revealed on reassessment. DISCUSSION: The prevalence of CMs of all neuromuscular disorders is approximately 6 in 100,000 live births, with regional variations. Three main defined CMs include centro nuclear myopathy (CNM), nemaline rod myopathy (NRM), and central core disease (CCD). However, they are more diverse with overlapping clinical and histopathological features, thus broadening the spectra within each category of congenital myopathy. CONCLUSION: Identification of cases with overlap of pathological features has diagnostic relevance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4888682 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48886822016-06-10 Coexistence of central nucleus, cores, and rods: Diagnostic relevance Dhinakaran, Sathiyabama Kumar, Rashmi Santhosh Thakkar, Ravindra Narayanappa, Gayathri Ann Indian Acad Neurol Original Article BACKGROUND: Congenital myopathies (CMs) though considered distinct disorders, simultaneous occurrence of central nucleus, nemaline rods, and cores in the same biopsy are scarcely reported. OBJECTIVE: A retrospective reassessment of cases diagnosed as CMs to look for multiple pathologies missed, if any, during the initial diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Enzyme histochemical, and immunohistochemical-stained slides from 125 cases diagnosed as congenital myopathy were reassessed. RESULTS: The study revealed 15 cases (12%) of congenital myopathy with more than one morphological feature. Central nucleus with cores (n = 11), central nucleus, nemaline rods and cores (n = 3), and nemaline rods with cores (n = 1). 4/11 cases were diagnosed as centronuclear myopathy (CNM) in the first instance; in addition, cores were revealed on reassessment. DISCUSSION: The prevalence of CMs of all neuromuscular disorders is approximately 6 in 100,000 live births, with regional variations. Three main defined CMs include centro nuclear myopathy (CNM), nemaline rod myopathy (NRM), and central core disease (CCD). However, they are more diverse with overlapping clinical and histopathological features, thus broadening the spectra within each category of congenital myopathy. CONCLUSION: Identification of cases with overlap of pathological features has diagnostic relevance. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4888682/ /pubmed/27293330 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-2327.176861 Text en Copyright: © Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Dhinakaran, Sathiyabama Kumar, Rashmi Santhosh Thakkar, Ravindra Narayanappa, Gayathri Coexistence of central nucleus, cores, and rods: Diagnostic relevance |
title | Coexistence of central nucleus, cores, and rods: Diagnostic relevance |
title_full | Coexistence of central nucleus, cores, and rods: Diagnostic relevance |
title_fullStr | Coexistence of central nucleus, cores, and rods: Diagnostic relevance |
title_full_unstemmed | Coexistence of central nucleus, cores, and rods: Diagnostic relevance |
title_short | Coexistence of central nucleus, cores, and rods: Diagnostic relevance |
title_sort | coexistence of central nucleus, cores, and rods: diagnostic relevance |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4888682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27293330 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-2327.176861 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dhinakaransathiyabama coexistenceofcentralnucleuscoresandrodsdiagnosticrelevance AT kumarrashmisanthosh coexistenceofcentralnucleuscoresandrodsdiagnosticrelevance AT thakkarravindra coexistenceofcentralnucleuscoresandrodsdiagnosticrelevance AT narayanappagayathri coexistenceofcentralnucleuscoresandrodsdiagnosticrelevance |