Cargando…

Coexistence of central nucleus, cores, and rods: Diagnostic relevance

BACKGROUND: Congenital myopathies (CMs) though considered distinct disorders, simultaneous occurrence of central nucleus, nemaline rods, and cores in the same biopsy are scarcely reported. OBJECTIVE: A retrospective reassessment of cases diagnosed as CMs to look for multiple pathologies missed, if a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dhinakaran, Sathiyabama, Kumar, Rashmi Santhosh, Thakkar, Ravindra, Narayanappa, Gayathri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4888682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27293330
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-2327.176861
_version_ 1782434888942616576
author Dhinakaran, Sathiyabama
Kumar, Rashmi Santhosh
Thakkar, Ravindra
Narayanappa, Gayathri
author_facet Dhinakaran, Sathiyabama
Kumar, Rashmi Santhosh
Thakkar, Ravindra
Narayanappa, Gayathri
author_sort Dhinakaran, Sathiyabama
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Congenital myopathies (CMs) though considered distinct disorders, simultaneous occurrence of central nucleus, nemaline rods, and cores in the same biopsy are scarcely reported. OBJECTIVE: A retrospective reassessment of cases diagnosed as CMs to look for multiple pathologies missed, if any, during the initial diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Enzyme histochemical, and immunohistochemical-stained slides from 125 cases diagnosed as congenital myopathy were reassessed. RESULTS: The study revealed 15 cases (12%) of congenital myopathy with more than one morphological feature. Central nucleus with cores (n = 11), central nucleus, nemaline rods and cores (n = 3), and nemaline rods with cores (n = 1). 4/11 cases were diagnosed as centronuclear myopathy (CNM) in the first instance; in addition, cores were revealed on reassessment. DISCUSSION: The prevalence of CMs of all neuromuscular disorders is approximately 6 in 100,000 live births, with regional variations. Three main defined CMs include centro nuclear myopathy (CNM), nemaline rod myopathy (NRM), and central core disease (CCD). However, they are more diverse with overlapping clinical and histopathological features, thus broadening the spectra within each category of congenital myopathy. CONCLUSION: Identification of cases with overlap of pathological features has diagnostic relevance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4888682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48886822016-06-10 Coexistence of central nucleus, cores, and rods: Diagnostic relevance Dhinakaran, Sathiyabama Kumar, Rashmi Santhosh Thakkar, Ravindra Narayanappa, Gayathri Ann Indian Acad Neurol Original Article BACKGROUND: Congenital myopathies (CMs) though considered distinct disorders, simultaneous occurrence of central nucleus, nemaline rods, and cores in the same biopsy are scarcely reported. OBJECTIVE: A retrospective reassessment of cases diagnosed as CMs to look for multiple pathologies missed, if any, during the initial diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Enzyme histochemical, and immunohistochemical-stained slides from 125 cases diagnosed as congenital myopathy were reassessed. RESULTS: The study revealed 15 cases (12%) of congenital myopathy with more than one morphological feature. Central nucleus with cores (n = 11), central nucleus, nemaline rods and cores (n = 3), and nemaline rods with cores (n = 1). 4/11 cases were diagnosed as centronuclear myopathy (CNM) in the first instance; in addition, cores were revealed on reassessment. DISCUSSION: The prevalence of CMs of all neuromuscular disorders is approximately 6 in 100,000 live births, with regional variations. Three main defined CMs include centro nuclear myopathy (CNM), nemaline rod myopathy (NRM), and central core disease (CCD). However, they are more diverse with overlapping clinical and histopathological features, thus broadening the spectra within each category of congenital myopathy. CONCLUSION: Identification of cases with overlap of pathological features has diagnostic relevance. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4888682/ /pubmed/27293330 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-2327.176861 Text en Copyright: © Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Dhinakaran, Sathiyabama
Kumar, Rashmi Santhosh
Thakkar, Ravindra
Narayanappa, Gayathri
Coexistence of central nucleus, cores, and rods: Diagnostic relevance
title Coexistence of central nucleus, cores, and rods: Diagnostic relevance
title_full Coexistence of central nucleus, cores, and rods: Diagnostic relevance
title_fullStr Coexistence of central nucleus, cores, and rods: Diagnostic relevance
title_full_unstemmed Coexistence of central nucleus, cores, and rods: Diagnostic relevance
title_short Coexistence of central nucleus, cores, and rods: Diagnostic relevance
title_sort coexistence of central nucleus, cores, and rods: diagnostic relevance
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4888682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27293330
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-2327.176861
work_keys_str_mv AT dhinakaransathiyabama coexistenceofcentralnucleuscoresandrodsdiagnosticrelevance
AT kumarrashmisanthosh coexistenceofcentralnucleuscoresandrodsdiagnosticrelevance
AT thakkarravindra coexistenceofcentralnucleuscoresandrodsdiagnosticrelevance
AT narayanappagayathri coexistenceofcentralnucleuscoresandrodsdiagnosticrelevance