Cargando…

Impact of injection therapy on retinal patients with diabetic macular edema or retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE: An important factor in the choice of therapy is the impact it has on the patient’s quality of life. This survey aimed to understand treatment burden, treatment-related anxiety and worry, and practical issues such as appointment attendance and work absence in patients receiving injection the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sivaprasad, Sobha, Oyetunde, Sesan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4888735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27307696
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S100168
_version_ 1782434900908965888
author Sivaprasad, Sobha
Oyetunde, Sesan
author_facet Sivaprasad, Sobha
Oyetunde, Sesan
author_sort Sivaprasad, Sobha
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: An important factor in the choice of therapy is the impact it has on the patient’s quality of life. This survey aimed to understand treatment burden, treatment-related anxiety and worry, and practical issues such as appointment attendance and work absence in patients receiving injection therapy for diabetic macular edema (DME) or retinal vein occlusion (RVO). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A European sample of 131 retinal patients completed a detailed questionnaire to elucidate the impact of injection therapy on individuals with DME or RVO. RESULTS: RVO and DME greatly impact a patient’s quality of life. An intensive injection regimen and the requirements for multiple hospital visits place a large practical burden on the patient. Each intravitreal injection appointment (including travel time) was reported to take an average of 4.5 hours, with a total appointment burden over 6 months of 13.5 hours and 20 hours for RVO and DME patients, respectively. This creates a significant burden on patient time and may make appointment attendance difficult. Indeed, 53% of working patients needed to take at least 1 day off work per appointment and 71% of patients required a carer’s assistance at the time of the injection appointment, ~6.3 hours per injection. In addition to practical issues, three-quarters of patients reported experiencing anxiety about their most recent injection treatment, with 54% of patients reporting that they were anxious for at least 2 days prior to the injection. Patients’ most desired improvement to their treatment regimen was to have fewer injections and to require fewer appointments, to achieve the same visual results. CONCLUSION: Patients’ quality of life is clearly very affected by having to manage an intensive intravitreal injection regimen, with a considerable treatment burden having a large negative effect. Reducing the appointment burden to achieve the same visual outcomes and the provision of additional support for patients to attend appointments would greatly benefit those receiving intravitreal injection therapies for DME and RVO.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4888735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48887352016-06-15 Impact of injection therapy on retinal patients with diabetic macular edema or retinal vein occlusion Sivaprasad, Sobha Oyetunde, Sesan Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: An important factor in the choice of therapy is the impact it has on the patient’s quality of life. This survey aimed to understand treatment burden, treatment-related anxiety and worry, and practical issues such as appointment attendance and work absence in patients receiving injection therapy for diabetic macular edema (DME) or retinal vein occlusion (RVO). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A European sample of 131 retinal patients completed a detailed questionnaire to elucidate the impact of injection therapy on individuals with DME or RVO. RESULTS: RVO and DME greatly impact a patient’s quality of life. An intensive injection regimen and the requirements for multiple hospital visits place a large practical burden on the patient. Each intravitreal injection appointment (including travel time) was reported to take an average of 4.5 hours, with a total appointment burden over 6 months of 13.5 hours and 20 hours for RVO and DME patients, respectively. This creates a significant burden on patient time and may make appointment attendance difficult. Indeed, 53% of working patients needed to take at least 1 day off work per appointment and 71% of patients required a carer’s assistance at the time of the injection appointment, ~6.3 hours per injection. In addition to practical issues, three-quarters of patients reported experiencing anxiety about their most recent injection treatment, with 54% of patients reporting that they were anxious for at least 2 days prior to the injection. Patients’ most desired improvement to their treatment regimen was to have fewer injections and to require fewer appointments, to achieve the same visual results. CONCLUSION: Patients’ quality of life is clearly very affected by having to manage an intensive intravitreal injection regimen, with a considerable treatment burden having a large negative effect. Reducing the appointment burden to achieve the same visual outcomes and the provision of additional support for patients to attend appointments would greatly benefit those receiving intravitreal injection therapies for DME and RVO. Dove Medical Press 2016-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4888735/ /pubmed/27307696 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S100168 Text en © 2016 Sivaprasad and Oyetunde. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sivaprasad, Sobha
Oyetunde, Sesan
Impact of injection therapy on retinal patients with diabetic macular edema or retinal vein occlusion
title Impact of injection therapy on retinal patients with diabetic macular edema or retinal vein occlusion
title_full Impact of injection therapy on retinal patients with diabetic macular edema or retinal vein occlusion
title_fullStr Impact of injection therapy on retinal patients with diabetic macular edema or retinal vein occlusion
title_full_unstemmed Impact of injection therapy on retinal patients with diabetic macular edema or retinal vein occlusion
title_short Impact of injection therapy on retinal patients with diabetic macular edema or retinal vein occlusion
title_sort impact of injection therapy on retinal patients with diabetic macular edema or retinal vein occlusion
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4888735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27307696
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S100168
work_keys_str_mv AT sivaprasadsobha impactofinjectiontherapyonretinalpatientswithdiabeticmacularedemaorretinalveinocclusion
AT oyetundesesan impactofinjectiontherapyonretinalpatientswithdiabeticmacularedemaorretinalveinocclusion