Cargando…
High Levels of Sample-to-Sample Variation Confound Data Analysis for Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening of Fetal Microdeletions
Our goal was to test the hypothesis that inter-individual genomic copy number variation in control samples is a confounding factor in the non-invasive prenatal detection of fetal microdeletions via the sequence-based analysis of maternal plasma DNA. The database of genomic variants (DGV) was used to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4889033/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27249650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153182 |
_version_ | 1782434932147093504 |
---|---|
author | Chu, Tianjiao Yeniterzi, Suveyda Yatsenko, Svetlana A. Dunkel, Mary Shaw, Patricia A. Bunce, Kimberly D. Peters, David G. |
author_facet | Chu, Tianjiao Yeniterzi, Suveyda Yatsenko, Svetlana A. Dunkel, Mary Shaw, Patricia A. Bunce, Kimberly D. Peters, David G. |
author_sort | Chu, Tianjiao |
collection | PubMed |
description | Our goal was to test the hypothesis that inter-individual genomic copy number variation in control samples is a confounding factor in the non-invasive prenatal detection of fetal microdeletions via the sequence-based analysis of maternal plasma DNA. The database of genomic variants (DGV) was used to determine the “Genomic Variants Frequency” (GVF) for each 50kb region in the human genome. Whole genome sequencing of fifteen karyotypically normal maternal plasma and six CVS DNA controls samples was performed. The coefficient of variation of relative read counts (cv.RTC) for these samples was determined for each 50kb region. Maternal plasma from two pregnancies affected with a chromosome 5p microdeletion was also sequenced, and analyzed using the GCREM algorithm. We found strong correlation between high variance in read counts and GVF amongst controls. Consequently we were unable to confirm the presence of the microdeletion via sequencing of maternal plasma samples obtained from two sequential affected pregnancies. Caution should be exercised when performing NIPT for microdeletions. It is vital to develop our understanding of the factors that impact the sensitivity and specificity of these approaches. In particular, benign copy number variation amongst controls is a major confounder, and their effects should be corrected bioinformatically. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4889033 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48890332016-06-10 High Levels of Sample-to-Sample Variation Confound Data Analysis for Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening of Fetal Microdeletions Chu, Tianjiao Yeniterzi, Suveyda Yatsenko, Svetlana A. Dunkel, Mary Shaw, Patricia A. Bunce, Kimberly D. Peters, David G. PLoS One Research Article Our goal was to test the hypothesis that inter-individual genomic copy number variation in control samples is a confounding factor in the non-invasive prenatal detection of fetal microdeletions via the sequence-based analysis of maternal plasma DNA. The database of genomic variants (DGV) was used to determine the “Genomic Variants Frequency” (GVF) for each 50kb region in the human genome. Whole genome sequencing of fifteen karyotypically normal maternal plasma and six CVS DNA controls samples was performed. The coefficient of variation of relative read counts (cv.RTC) for these samples was determined for each 50kb region. Maternal plasma from two pregnancies affected with a chromosome 5p microdeletion was also sequenced, and analyzed using the GCREM algorithm. We found strong correlation between high variance in read counts and GVF amongst controls. Consequently we were unable to confirm the presence of the microdeletion via sequencing of maternal plasma samples obtained from two sequential affected pregnancies. Caution should be exercised when performing NIPT for microdeletions. It is vital to develop our understanding of the factors that impact the sensitivity and specificity of these approaches. In particular, benign copy number variation amongst controls is a major confounder, and their effects should be corrected bioinformatically. Public Library of Science 2016-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4889033/ /pubmed/27249650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153182 Text en © 2016 Chu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chu, Tianjiao Yeniterzi, Suveyda Yatsenko, Svetlana A. Dunkel, Mary Shaw, Patricia A. Bunce, Kimberly D. Peters, David G. High Levels of Sample-to-Sample Variation Confound Data Analysis for Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening of Fetal Microdeletions |
title | High Levels of Sample-to-Sample Variation Confound Data Analysis for Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening of Fetal Microdeletions |
title_full | High Levels of Sample-to-Sample Variation Confound Data Analysis for Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening of Fetal Microdeletions |
title_fullStr | High Levels of Sample-to-Sample Variation Confound Data Analysis for Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening of Fetal Microdeletions |
title_full_unstemmed | High Levels of Sample-to-Sample Variation Confound Data Analysis for Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening of Fetal Microdeletions |
title_short | High Levels of Sample-to-Sample Variation Confound Data Analysis for Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening of Fetal Microdeletions |
title_sort | high levels of sample-to-sample variation confound data analysis for non-invasive prenatal screening of fetal microdeletions |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4889033/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27249650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153182 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chutianjiao highlevelsofsampletosamplevariationconfounddataanalysisfornoninvasiveprenatalscreeningoffetalmicrodeletions AT yeniterzisuveyda highlevelsofsampletosamplevariationconfounddataanalysisfornoninvasiveprenatalscreeningoffetalmicrodeletions AT yatsenkosvetlanaa highlevelsofsampletosamplevariationconfounddataanalysisfornoninvasiveprenatalscreeningoffetalmicrodeletions AT dunkelmary highlevelsofsampletosamplevariationconfounddataanalysisfornoninvasiveprenatalscreeningoffetalmicrodeletions AT shawpatriciaa highlevelsofsampletosamplevariationconfounddataanalysisfornoninvasiveprenatalscreeningoffetalmicrodeletions AT buncekimberlyd highlevelsofsampletosamplevariationconfounddataanalysisfornoninvasiveprenatalscreeningoffetalmicrodeletions AT petersdavidg highlevelsofsampletosamplevariationconfounddataanalysisfornoninvasiveprenatalscreeningoffetalmicrodeletions |