Cargando…

High Levels of Sample-to-Sample Variation Confound Data Analysis for Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening of Fetal Microdeletions

Our goal was to test the hypothesis that inter-individual genomic copy number variation in control samples is a confounding factor in the non-invasive prenatal detection of fetal microdeletions via the sequence-based analysis of maternal plasma DNA. The database of genomic variants (DGV) was used to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chu, Tianjiao, Yeniterzi, Suveyda, Yatsenko, Svetlana A., Dunkel, Mary, Shaw, Patricia A., Bunce, Kimberly D., Peters, David G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4889033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27249650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153182
_version_ 1782434932147093504
author Chu, Tianjiao
Yeniterzi, Suveyda
Yatsenko, Svetlana A.
Dunkel, Mary
Shaw, Patricia A.
Bunce, Kimberly D.
Peters, David G.
author_facet Chu, Tianjiao
Yeniterzi, Suveyda
Yatsenko, Svetlana A.
Dunkel, Mary
Shaw, Patricia A.
Bunce, Kimberly D.
Peters, David G.
author_sort Chu, Tianjiao
collection PubMed
description Our goal was to test the hypothesis that inter-individual genomic copy number variation in control samples is a confounding factor in the non-invasive prenatal detection of fetal microdeletions via the sequence-based analysis of maternal plasma DNA. The database of genomic variants (DGV) was used to determine the “Genomic Variants Frequency” (GVF) for each 50kb region in the human genome. Whole genome sequencing of fifteen karyotypically normal maternal plasma and six CVS DNA controls samples was performed. The coefficient of variation of relative read counts (cv.RTC) for these samples was determined for each 50kb region. Maternal plasma from two pregnancies affected with a chromosome 5p microdeletion was also sequenced, and analyzed using the GCREM algorithm. We found strong correlation between high variance in read counts and GVF amongst controls. Consequently we were unable to confirm the presence of the microdeletion via sequencing of maternal plasma samples obtained from two sequential affected pregnancies. Caution should be exercised when performing NIPT for microdeletions. It is vital to develop our understanding of the factors that impact the sensitivity and specificity of these approaches. In particular, benign copy number variation amongst controls is a major confounder, and their effects should be corrected bioinformatically.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4889033
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48890332016-06-10 High Levels of Sample-to-Sample Variation Confound Data Analysis for Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening of Fetal Microdeletions Chu, Tianjiao Yeniterzi, Suveyda Yatsenko, Svetlana A. Dunkel, Mary Shaw, Patricia A. Bunce, Kimberly D. Peters, David G. PLoS One Research Article Our goal was to test the hypothesis that inter-individual genomic copy number variation in control samples is a confounding factor in the non-invasive prenatal detection of fetal microdeletions via the sequence-based analysis of maternal plasma DNA. The database of genomic variants (DGV) was used to determine the “Genomic Variants Frequency” (GVF) for each 50kb region in the human genome. Whole genome sequencing of fifteen karyotypically normal maternal plasma and six CVS DNA controls samples was performed. The coefficient of variation of relative read counts (cv.RTC) for these samples was determined for each 50kb region. Maternal plasma from two pregnancies affected with a chromosome 5p microdeletion was also sequenced, and analyzed using the GCREM algorithm. We found strong correlation between high variance in read counts and GVF amongst controls. Consequently we were unable to confirm the presence of the microdeletion via sequencing of maternal plasma samples obtained from two sequential affected pregnancies. Caution should be exercised when performing NIPT for microdeletions. It is vital to develop our understanding of the factors that impact the sensitivity and specificity of these approaches. In particular, benign copy number variation amongst controls is a major confounder, and their effects should be corrected bioinformatically. Public Library of Science 2016-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4889033/ /pubmed/27249650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153182 Text en © 2016 Chu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chu, Tianjiao
Yeniterzi, Suveyda
Yatsenko, Svetlana A.
Dunkel, Mary
Shaw, Patricia A.
Bunce, Kimberly D.
Peters, David G.
High Levels of Sample-to-Sample Variation Confound Data Analysis for Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening of Fetal Microdeletions
title High Levels of Sample-to-Sample Variation Confound Data Analysis for Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening of Fetal Microdeletions
title_full High Levels of Sample-to-Sample Variation Confound Data Analysis for Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening of Fetal Microdeletions
title_fullStr High Levels of Sample-to-Sample Variation Confound Data Analysis for Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening of Fetal Microdeletions
title_full_unstemmed High Levels of Sample-to-Sample Variation Confound Data Analysis for Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening of Fetal Microdeletions
title_short High Levels of Sample-to-Sample Variation Confound Data Analysis for Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening of Fetal Microdeletions
title_sort high levels of sample-to-sample variation confound data analysis for non-invasive prenatal screening of fetal microdeletions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4889033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27249650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153182
work_keys_str_mv AT chutianjiao highlevelsofsampletosamplevariationconfounddataanalysisfornoninvasiveprenatalscreeningoffetalmicrodeletions
AT yeniterzisuveyda highlevelsofsampletosamplevariationconfounddataanalysisfornoninvasiveprenatalscreeningoffetalmicrodeletions
AT yatsenkosvetlanaa highlevelsofsampletosamplevariationconfounddataanalysisfornoninvasiveprenatalscreeningoffetalmicrodeletions
AT dunkelmary highlevelsofsampletosamplevariationconfounddataanalysisfornoninvasiveprenatalscreeningoffetalmicrodeletions
AT shawpatriciaa highlevelsofsampletosamplevariationconfounddataanalysisfornoninvasiveprenatalscreeningoffetalmicrodeletions
AT buncekimberlyd highlevelsofsampletosamplevariationconfounddataanalysisfornoninvasiveprenatalscreeningoffetalmicrodeletions
AT petersdavidg highlevelsofsampletosamplevariationconfounddataanalysisfornoninvasiveprenatalscreeningoffetalmicrodeletions