Cargando…
Resistance of Wheat Accessions to the English Grain Aphid Sitobion avenae
The English grain aphid, Sitobion avenae, is a major pest species of wheat crops; however, certain varieties may have stronger resistance to infestation than others. Here, we investigated 3 classical resistance mechanisms (antixenosis, antibiosis, and tolerance) by 14 wheat varieties/lines to S. ave...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4889116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27249206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156158 |
_version_ | 1782434949732761600 |
---|---|
author | Hu, Xiang-Shun Liu, Ying-Jie Wang, Yu-Han Wang, Zhe Yu, Xin-lin Wang, Bo Zhang, Gai-Sheng Liu, Xiao-Feng Hu, Zu-Qing Zhao, Hui-Yan Liu, Tong-Xian |
author_facet | Hu, Xiang-Shun Liu, Ying-Jie Wang, Yu-Han Wang, Zhe Yu, Xin-lin Wang, Bo Zhang, Gai-Sheng Liu, Xiao-Feng Hu, Zu-Qing Zhao, Hui-Yan Liu, Tong-Xian |
author_sort | Hu, Xiang-Shun |
collection | PubMed |
description | The English grain aphid, Sitobion avenae, is a major pest species of wheat crops; however, certain varieties may have stronger resistance to infestation than others. Here, we investigated 3 classical resistance mechanisms (antixenosis, antibiosis, and tolerance) by 14 wheat varieties/lines to S. avenae under laboratory and field conditions. Under laboratory conditions, alatae given the choice between 2 wheat varieties, strongly discriminated against certain varieties. Specifically, the ‘Amigo’ variety had the lowest palatability to S. avenae alatae of all varieties. ‘Tm’ (Triticum monococcum), ‘Astron,’ ‘Xanthus,’ ‘Ww2730,’ and ‘Batis’ varieties also had lower palatability than other varieties. Thus, these accessions may use antibiosis as the resistant mechanism. In contrast, under field conditions, there were no significant differences in the number of alatae detected on the 14 wheat varieties. One synthetic line (98-10-30, a cross between of Triticum aestivum (var. Chris) and Triticum turgidum (var. durum) hybridization) had low aphid numbers but high yield loss, indicating that it has high antibiosis, but poor tolerance. In comparison, ‘Amigo,’ ‘Xiaoyan22,’ and some ‘186Tm’ samples had high aphid numbers but low yield loss rates, indicating they have low antibiosis, but good tolerance. Aphid population size and wheat yield loss rates greatly varied in different fields and years for ‘98-10-35,’ ‘Xiaoyan22,’ ‘Tp,’ ‘Tam200,’ ‘PI high,’ and other ‘186Tm’ samples, which were hybrid offspring of T. aestivum and wheat related species. Thus, these germplasm should be considered for use in future studies. Overall, S. avenae is best adapted to ‘Xinong1376,’ because it was the most palatable variety, with the greatest yield loss rates of all 14 wheat varieties. However, individual varieties/lines influenced aphid populations differently in different years. Therefore, we strongly recommend a combination of laboratory and long-term field experiments in targeted planting regions to identify varieties/lines that consistently show high resistance to S. avenae infestation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4889116 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48891162016-06-10 Resistance of Wheat Accessions to the English Grain Aphid Sitobion avenae Hu, Xiang-Shun Liu, Ying-Jie Wang, Yu-Han Wang, Zhe Yu, Xin-lin Wang, Bo Zhang, Gai-Sheng Liu, Xiao-Feng Hu, Zu-Qing Zhao, Hui-Yan Liu, Tong-Xian PLoS One Research Article The English grain aphid, Sitobion avenae, is a major pest species of wheat crops; however, certain varieties may have stronger resistance to infestation than others. Here, we investigated 3 classical resistance mechanisms (antixenosis, antibiosis, and tolerance) by 14 wheat varieties/lines to S. avenae under laboratory and field conditions. Under laboratory conditions, alatae given the choice between 2 wheat varieties, strongly discriminated against certain varieties. Specifically, the ‘Amigo’ variety had the lowest palatability to S. avenae alatae of all varieties. ‘Tm’ (Triticum monococcum), ‘Astron,’ ‘Xanthus,’ ‘Ww2730,’ and ‘Batis’ varieties also had lower palatability than other varieties. Thus, these accessions may use antibiosis as the resistant mechanism. In contrast, under field conditions, there were no significant differences in the number of alatae detected on the 14 wheat varieties. One synthetic line (98-10-30, a cross between of Triticum aestivum (var. Chris) and Triticum turgidum (var. durum) hybridization) had low aphid numbers but high yield loss, indicating that it has high antibiosis, but poor tolerance. In comparison, ‘Amigo,’ ‘Xiaoyan22,’ and some ‘186Tm’ samples had high aphid numbers but low yield loss rates, indicating they have low antibiosis, but good tolerance. Aphid population size and wheat yield loss rates greatly varied in different fields and years for ‘98-10-35,’ ‘Xiaoyan22,’ ‘Tp,’ ‘Tam200,’ ‘PI high,’ and other ‘186Tm’ samples, which were hybrid offspring of T. aestivum and wheat related species. Thus, these germplasm should be considered for use in future studies. Overall, S. avenae is best adapted to ‘Xinong1376,’ because it was the most palatable variety, with the greatest yield loss rates of all 14 wheat varieties. However, individual varieties/lines influenced aphid populations differently in different years. Therefore, we strongly recommend a combination of laboratory and long-term field experiments in targeted planting regions to identify varieties/lines that consistently show high resistance to S. avenae infestation. Public Library of Science 2016-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4889116/ /pubmed/27249206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156158 Text en © 2016 Hu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hu, Xiang-Shun Liu, Ying-Jie Wang, Yu-Han Wang, Zhe Yu, Xin-lin Wang, Bo Zhang, Gai-Sheng Liu, Xiao-Feng Hu, Zu-Qing Zhao, Hui-Yan Liu, Tong-Xian Resistance of Wheat Accessions to the English Grain Aphid Sitobion avenae |
title | Resistance of Wheat Accessions to the English Grain Aphid Sitobion avenae |
title_full | Resistance of Wheat Accessions to the English Grain Aphid Sitobion avenae |
title_fullStr | Resistance of Wheat Accessions to the English Grain Aphid Sitobion avenae |
title_full_unstemmed | Resistance of Wheat Accessions to the English Grain Aphid Sitobion avenae |
title_short | Resistance of Wheat Accessions to the English Grain Aphid Sitobion avenae |
title_sort | resistance of wheat accessions to the english grain aphid sitobion avenae |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4889116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27249206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156158 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huxiangshun resistanceofwheataccessionstotheenglishgrainaphidsitobionavenae AT liuyingjie resistanceofwheataccessionstotheenglishgrainaphidsitobionavenae AT wangyuhan resistanceofwheataccessionstotheenglishgrainaphidsitobionavenae AT wangzhe resistanceofwheataccessionstotheenglishgrainaphidsitobionavenae AT yuxinlin resistanceofwheataccessionstotheenglishgrainaphidsitobionavenae AT wangbo resistanceofwheataccessionstotheenglishgrainaphidsitobionavenae AT zhanggaisheng resistanceofwheataccessionstotheenglishgrainaphidsitobionavenae AT liuxiaofeng resistanceofwheataccessionstotheenglishgrainaphidsitobionavenae AT huzuqing resistanceofwheataccessionstotheenglishgrainaphidsitobionavenae AT zhaohuiyan resistanceofwheataccessionstotheenglishgrainaphidsitobionavenae AT liutongxian resistanceofwheataccessionstotheenglishgrainaphidsitobionavenae |