Cargando…

Comparative Effectiveness of Interventions for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta‐Analysis

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of individual antiembolic interventions in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF): novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban); vitamin K antagonists (VKA); aspirin; and the Watchman...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tereshchenko, Larisa G., Henrikson, Charles A., Cigarroa, Joaquin, Steinberg, Jonathan S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4889191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27207998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003206
_version_ 1782434963122028544
author Tereshchenko, Larisa G.
Henrikson, Charles A.
Cigarroa, Joaquin
Steinberg, Jonathan S.
author_facet Tereshchenko, Larisa G.
Henrikson, Charles A.
Cigarroa, Joaquin
Steinberg, Jonathan S.
author_sort Tereshchenko, Larisa G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of individual antiembolic interventions in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF): novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban); vitamin K antagonists (VKA); aspirin; and the Watchman device. METHODS AND RESULTS: A network meta‐analysis of randomized, clinical trials (RCTs) was performed. RCTs that included patients with prosthetic cardiac valves or mitral stenosis, mean or median follow‐up <6 months, <200 participants, without published report in English language, and NOAC phase II studies were excluded. The placebo/control arm received either placebo or no treatment. The primary efficacy outcome was the combination of stroke (of any type) and systemic embolism. All‐cause mortality served as a secondary efficacy outcome. The primary safety outcome was the combination of major extracranial bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage. A total of 21 RCTs (96 017 nonvalvular AF patients; median age, 72 years; 65% males; median follow‐up, 1.7 years) were included. In comparison to placebo/control, use of aspirin (odds ratio [OR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.60–0.95]), VKA (0.38 [0.29–0.49]), apixaban (0.31 [0.22–0.45]), dabigatran (0.29 [0.20–0.43]), edoxaban (0.38 [0.26–0.54]), rivaroxaban (0.27 [0.18–0.42]), and the Watchman device (0.36 [0.16–0.80]) significantly reduced the risk of any stroke or systemic embolism in nonvalvular AF patients, as well as all‐cause mortality (aspirin: OR, 0.82 [0.68–0.99]; VKA: 0.69 [0.57–0.85]; apixaban: 0.62 [0.50–0.78]; dabigatran: 0.62 [0.50–0.78]; edoxaban: 0.62 [0.50–0.77]; rivaroxaban: 0.58 [0.44–0.77]; and the Watchman device: 0.47 [0.25–0.88]). Apixaban (0.89 [0.80–0.99]), dabigatran (0.90 [0.82–0.99]), and edoxaban (0.89 [0.82–0.96]) reduced risk of all‐cause death as compared to VKA. CONCLUSIONS: The entire spectrum of therapy to prevent thromboembolism in nonvalvular AF significantly reduced stroke/systemic embolism events and mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4889191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48891912016-06-09 Comparative Effectiveness of Interventions for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta‐Analysis Tereshchenko, Larisa G. Henrikson, Charles A. Cigarroa, Joaquin Steinberg, Jonathan S. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of individual antiembolic interventions in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF): novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban); vitamin K antagonists (VKA); aspirin; and the Watchman device. METHODS AND RESULTS: A network meta‐analysis of randomized, clinical trials (RCTs) was performed. RCTs that included patients with prosthetic cardiac valves or mitral stenosis, mean or median follow‐up <6 months, <200 participants, without published report in English language, and NOAC phase II studies were excluded. The placebo/control arm received either placebo or no treatment. The primary efficacy outcome was the combination of stroke (of any type) and systemic embolism. All‐cause mortality served as a secondary efficacy outcome. The primary safety outcome was the combination of major extracranial bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage. A total of 21 RCTs (96 017 nonvalvular AF patients; median age, 72 years; 65% males; median follow‐up, 1.7 years) were included. In comparison to placebo/control, use of aspirin (odds ratio [OR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.60–0.95]), VKA (0.38 [0.29–0.49]), apixaban (0.31 [0.22–0.45]), dabigatran (0.29 [0.20–0.43]), edoxaban (0.38 [0.26–0.54]), rivaroxaban (0.27 [0.18–0.42]), and the Watchman device (0.36 [0.16–0.80]) significantly reduced the risk of any stroke or systemic embolism in nonvalvular AF patients, as well as all‐cause mortality (aspirin: OR, 0.82 [0.68–0.99]; VKA: 0.69 [0.57–0.85]; apixaban: 0.62 [0.50–0.78]; dabigatran: 0.62 [0.50–0.78]; edoxaban: 0.62 [0.50–0.77]; rivaroxaban: 0.58 [0.44–0.77]; and the Watchman device: 0.47 [0.25–0.88]). Apixaban (0.89 [0.80–0.99]), dabigatran (0.90 [0.82–0.99]), and edoxaban (0.89 [0.82–0.96]) reduced risk of all‐cause death as compared to VKA. CONCLUSIONS: The entire spectrum of therapy to prevent thromboembolism in nonvalvular AF significantly reduced stroke/systemic embolism events and mortality. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4889191/ /pubmed/27207998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003206 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Tereshchenko, Larisa G.
Henrikson, Charles A.
Cigarroa, Joaquin
Steinberg, Jonathan S.
Comparative Effectiveness of Interventions for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta‐Analysis
title Comparative Effectiveness of Interventions for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta‐Analysis
title_full Comparative Effectiveness of Interventions for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta‐Analysis
title_fullStr Comparative Effectiveness of Interventions for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta‐Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Effectiveness of Interventions for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta‐Analysis
title_short Comparative Effectiveness of Interventions for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta‐Analysis
title_sort comparative effectiveness of interventions for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a network meta‐analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4889191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27207998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003206
work_keys_str_mv AT tereshchenkolarisag comparativeeffectivenessofinterventionsforstrokepreventioninatrialfibrillationanetworkmetaanalysis
AT henriksoncharlesa comparativeeffectivenessofinterventionsforstrokepreventioninatrialfibrillationanetworkmetaanalysis
AT cigarroajoaquin comparativeeffectivenessofinterventionsforstrokepreventioninatrialfibrillationanetworkmetaanalysis
AT steinbergjonathans comparativeeffectivenessofinterventionsforstrokepreventioninatrialfibrillationanetworkmetaanalysis