Cargando…
Comparative Effectiveness of Interventions for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta‐Analysis
BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of individual antiembolic interventions in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF): novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban); vitamin K antagonists (VKA); aspirin; and the Watchman...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4889191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27207998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003206 |
_version_ | 1782434963122028544 |
---|---|
author | Tereshchenko, Larisa G. Henrikson, Charles A. Cigarroa, Joaquin Steinberg, Jonathan S. |
author_facet | Tereshchenko, Larisa G. Henrikson, Charles A. Cigarroa, Joaquin Steinberg, Jonathan S. |
author_sort | Tereshchenko, Larisa G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of individual antiembolic interventions in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF): novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban); vitamin K antagonists (VKA); aspirin; and the Watchman device. METHODS AND RESULTS: A network meta‐analysis of randomized, clinical trials (RCTs) was performed. RCTs that included patients with prosthetic cardiac valves or mitral stenosis, mean or median follow‐up <6 months, <200 participants, without published report in English language, and NOAC phase II studies were excluded. The placebo/control arm received either placebo or no treatment. The primary efficacy outcome was the combination of stroke (of any type) and systemic embolism. All‐cause mortality served as a secondary efficacy outcome. The primary safety outcome was the combination of major extracranial bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage. A total of 21 RCTs (96 017 nonvalvular AF patients; median age, 72 years; 65% males; median follow‐up, 1.7 years) were included. In comparison to placebo/control, use of aspirin (odds ratio [OR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.60–0.95]), VKA (0.38 [0.29–0.49]), apixaban (0.31 [0.22–0.45]), dabigatran (0.29 [0.20–0.43]), edoxaban (0.38 [0.26–0.54]), rivaroxaban (0.27 [0.18–0.42]), and the Watchman device (0.36 [0.16–0.80]) significantly reduced the risk of any stroke or systemic embolism in nonvalvular AF patients, as well as all‐cause mortality (aspirin: OR, 0.82 [0.68–0.99]; VKA: 0.69 [0.57–0.85]; apixaban: 0.62 [0.50–0.78]; dabigatran: 0.62 [0.50–0.78]; edoxaban: 0.62 [0.50–0.77]; rivaroxaban: 0.58 [0.44–0.77]; and the Watchman device: 0.47 [0.25–0.88]). Apixaban (0.89 [0.80–0.99]), dabigatran (0.90 [0.82–0.99]), and edoxaban (0.89 [0.82–0.96]) reduced risk of all‐cause death as compared to VKA. CONCLUSIONS: The entire spectrum of therapy to prevent thromboembolism in nonvalvular AF significantly reduced stroke/systemic embolism events and mortality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4889191 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48891912016-06-09 Comparative Effectiveness of Interventions for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta‐Analysis Tereshchenko, Larisa G. Henrikson, Charles A. Cigarroa, Joaquin Steinberg, Jonathan S. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of individual antiembolic interventions in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF): novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban); vitamin K antagonists (VKA); aspirin; and the Watchman device. METHODS AND RESULTS: A network meta‐analysis of randomized, clinical trials (RCTs) was performed. RCTs that included patients with prosthetic cardiac valves or mitral stenosis, mean or median follow‐up <6 months, <200 participants, without published report in English language, and NOAC phase II studies were excluded. The placebo/control arm received either placebo or no treatment. The primary efficacy outcome was the combination of stroke (of any type) and systemic embolism. All‐cause mortality served as a secondary efficacy outcome. The primary safety outcome was the combination of major extracranial bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage. A total of 21 RCTs (96 017 nonvalvular AF patients; median age, 72 years; 65% males; median follow‐up, 1.7 years) were included. In comparison to placebo/control, use of aspirin (odds ratio [OR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.60–0.95]), VKA (0.38 [0.29–0.49]), apixaban (0.31 [0.22–0.45]), dabigatran (0.29 [0.20–0.43]), edoxaban (0.38 [0.26–0.54]), rivaroxaban (0.27 [0.18–0.42]), and the Watchman device (0.36 [0.16–0.80]) significantly reduced the risk of any stroke or systemic embolism in nonvalvular AF patients, as well as all‐cause mortality (aspirin: OR, 0.82 [0.68–0.99]; VKA: 0.69 [0.57–0.85]; apixaban: 0.62 [0.50–0.78]; dabigatran: 0.62 [0.50–0.78]; edoxaban: 0.62 [0.50–0.77]; rivaroxaban: 0.58 [0.44–0.77]; and the Watchman device: 0.47 [0.25–0.88]). Apixaban (0.89 [0.80–0.99]), dabigatran (0.90 [0.82–0.99]), and edoxaban (0.89 [0.82–0.96]) reduced risk of all‐cause death as compared to VKA. CONCLUSIONS: The entire spectrum of therapy to prevent thromboembolism in nonvalvular AF significantly reduced stroke/systemic embolism events and mortality. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4889191/ /pubmed/27207998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003206 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Tereshchenko, Larisa G. Henrikson, Charles A. Cigarroa, Joaquin Steinberg, Jonathan S. Comparative Effectiveness of Interventions for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta‐Analysis |
title | Comparative Effectiveness of Interventions for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta‐Analysis |
title_full | Comparative Effectiveness of Interventions for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta‐Analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparative Effectiveness of Interventions for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta‐Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Effectiveness of Interventions for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta‐Analysis |
title_short | Comparative Effectiveness of Interventions for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta‐Analysis |
title_sort | comparative effectiveness of interventions for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a network meta‐analysis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4889191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27207998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003206 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tereshchenkolarisag comparativeeffectivenessofinterventionsforstrokepreventioninatrialfibrillationanetworkmetaanalysis AT henriksoncharlesa comparativeeffectivenessofinterventionsforstrokepreventioninatrialfibrillationanetworkmetaanalysis AT cigarroajoaquin comparativeeffectivenessofinterventionsforstrokepreventioninatrialfibrillationanetworkmetaanalysis AT steinbergjonathans comparativeeffectivenessofinterventionsforstrokepreventioninatrialfibrillationanetworkmetaanalysis |