Cargando…

Management of Intracranial Meningiomas Using Keyhole Techniques

Background: Keyhole craniotomies are increasingly being used for lesions of the skull base. Here we review our recent experience with these approaches for resection of intracranial meningiomas. Methods: Clinical and operative data were gathered on all patients treated with keyhole approaches by the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burks, Joshua D, Conner, Andrew K, Bonney, Phillip A, Archer, Jacob B, Christensen, Blake, Smith, Jacqueline, Safavi-Abbasi, Sam, Sughrue, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4889455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27284496
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.588
_version_ 1782434975855935488
author Burks, Joshua D
Conner, Andrew K
Bonney, Phillip A
Archer, Jacob B
Christensen, Blake
Smith, Jacqueline
Safavi-Abbasi, Sam
Sughrue, Michael
author_facet Burks, Joshua D
Conner, Andrew K
Bonney, Phillip A
Archer, Jacob B
Christensen, Blake
Smith, Jacqueline
Safavi-Abbasi, Sam
Sughrue, Michael
author_sort Burks, Joshua D
collection PubMed
description Background: Keyhole craniotomies are increasingly being used for lesions of the skull base. Here we review our recent experience with these approaches for resection of intracranial meningiomas. Methods: Clinical and operative data were gathered on all patients treated with keyhole approaches by the senior author from January 2012 to June 2013. Thirty-one meningiomas were resected in 27 patients, including 9 supratentorial, 5 anterior fossa, 7 middle fossa, 6 posterior fossa, and 4 complex skull base tumors. Twenty-nine tumors were WHO Grade I, and 2 were Grade II.  Results: The mean operative time was 8 hours, 22 minutes (range, 2:55-16:14) for skull-base tumors, and 4 hours, 27 minutes (range, 1:45-7:13) for supratentorial tumors. Simpson Resection grades were as follows: Grade I = 8, II = 8, III = 1, IV = 15, V = 0. The median postoperative hospital stay was 4 days (range, 1-20 days). In the 9 patients presenting with some degree of visual loss, 7 saw improvement or complete resolution. In the 6 patients presenting with cranial nerve palsies, 4 experienced improvement or resolution of the deficit postoperatively. Four patients experienced new neurologic deficits, all of which were improved or resolved at the time of the last follow-up. Technical aspects and surgical nuances of these approaches for management of intracranial meningiomas are discussed.  Conclusions: With careful preoperative evaluation, keyhole approaches can be utilized singly or in combination to manage meningiomas in a wide variety of locations with satisfactory results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4889455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48894552016-06-09 Management of Intracranial Meningiomas Using Keyhole Techniques Burks, Joshua D Conner, Andrew K Bonney, Phillip A Archer, Jacob B Christensen, Blake Smith, Jacqueline Safavi-Abbasi, Sam Sughrue, Michael Cureus Neurosurgery Background: Keyhole craniotomies are increasingly being used for lesions of the skull base. Here we review our recent experience with these approaches for resection of intracranial meningiomas. Methods: Clinical and operative data were gathered on all patients treated with keyhole approaches by the senior author from January 2012 to June 2013. Thirty-one meningiomas were resected in 27 patients, including 9 supratentorial, 5 anterior fossa, 7 middle fossa, 6 posterior fossa, and 4 complex skull base tumors. Twenty-nine tumors were WHO Grade I, and 2 were Grade II.  Results: The mean operative time was 8 hours, 22 minutes (range, 2:55-16:14) for skull-base tumors, and 4 hours, 27 minutes (range, 1:45-7:13) for supratentorial tumors. Simpson Resection grades were as follows: Grade I = 8, II = 8, III = 1, IV = 15, V = 0. The median postoperative hospital stay was 4 days (range, 1-20 days). In the 9 patients presenting with some degree of visual loss, 7 saw improvement or complete resolution. In the 6 patients presenting with cranial nerve palsies, 4 experienced improvement or resolution of the deficit postoperatively. Four patients experienced new neurologic deficits, all of which were improved or resolved at the time of the last follow-up. Technical aspects and surgical nuances of these approaches for management of intracranial meningiomas are discussed.  Conclusions: With careful preoperative evaluation, keyhole approaches can be utilized singly or in combination to manage meningiomas in a wide variety of locations with satisfactory results. Cureus 2016-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4889455/ /pubmed/27284496 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.588 Text en Copyright © 2016, Burks et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neurosurgery
Burks, Joshua D
Conner, Andrew K
Bonney, Phillip A
Archer, Jacob B
Christensen, Blake
Smith, Jacqueline
Safavi-Abbasi, Sam
Sughrue, Michael
Management of Intracranial Meningiomas Using Keyhole Techniques
title Management of Intracranial Meningiomas Using Keyhole Techniques
title_full Management of Intracranial Meningiomas Using Keyhole Techniques
title_fullStr Management of Intracranial Meningiomas Using Keyhole Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Management of Intracranial Meningiomas Using Keyhole Techniques
title_short Management of Intracranial Meningiomas Using Keyhole Techniques
title_sort management of intracranial meningiomas using keyhole techniques
topic Neurosurgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4889455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27284496
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.588
work_keys_str_mv AT burksjoshuad managementofintracranialmeningiomasusingkeyholetechniques
AT connerandrewk managementofintracranialmeningiomasusingkeyholetechniques
AT bonneyphillipa managementofintracranialmeningiomasusingkeyholetechniques
AT archerjacobb managementofintracranialmeningiomasusingkeyholetechniques
AT christensenblake managementofintracranialmeningiomasusingkeyholetechniques
AT smithjacqueline managementofintracranialmeningiomasusingkeyholetechniques
AT safaviabbasisam managementofintracranialmeningiomasusingkeyholetechniques
AT sughruemichael managementofintracranialmeningiomasusingkeyholetechniques