Cargando…
Management of Intracranial Meningiomas Using Keyhole Techniques
Background: Keyhole craniotomies are increasingly being used for lesions of the skull base. Here we review our recent experience with these approaches for resection of intracranial meningiomas. Methods: Clinical and operative data were gathered on all patients treated with keyhole approaches by the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4889455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27284496 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.588 |
_version_ | 1782434975855935488 |
---|---|
author | Burks, Joshua D Conner, Andrew K Bonney, Phillip A Archer, Jacob B Christensen, Blake Smith, Jacqueline Safavi-Abbasi, Sam Sughrue, Michael |
author_facet | Burks, Joshua D Conner, Andrew K Bonney, Phillip A Archer, Jacob B Christensen, Blake Smith, Jacqueline Safavi-Abbasi, Sam Sughrue, Michael |
author_sort | Burks, Joshua D |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Keyhole craniotomies are increasingly being used for lesions of the skull base. Here we review our recent experience with these approaches for resection of intracranial meningiomas. Methods: Clinical and operative data were gathered on all patients treated with keyhole approaches by the senior author from January 2012 to June 2013. Thirty-one meningiomas were resected in 27 patients, including 9 supratentorial, 5 anterior fossa, 7 middle fossa, 6 posterior fossa, and 4 complex skull base tumors. Twenty-nine tumors were WHO Grade I, and 2 were Grade II. Results: The mean operative time was 8 hours, 22 minutes (range, 2:55-16:14) for skull-base tumors, and 4 hours, 27 minutes (range, 1:45-7:13) for supratentorial tumors. Simpson Resection grades were as follows: Grade I = 8, II = 8, III = 1, IV = 15, V = 0. The median postoperative hospital stay was 4 days (range, 1-20 days). In the 9 patients presenting with some degree of visual loss, 7 saw improvement or complete resolution. In the 6 patients presenting with cranial nerve palsies, 4 experienced improvement or resolution of the deficit postoperatively. Four patients experienced new neurologic deficits, all of which were improved or resolved at the time of the last follow-up. Technical aspects and surgical nuances of these approaches for management of intracranial meningiomas are discussed. Conclusions: With careful preoperative evaluation, keyhole approaches can be utilized singly or in combination to manage meningiomas in a wide variety of locations with satisfactory results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4889455 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48894552016-06-09 Management of Intracranial Meningiomas Using Keyhole Techniques Burks, Joshua D Conner, Andrew K Bonney, Phillip A Archer, Jacob B Christensen, Blake Smith, Jacqueline Safavi-Abbasi, Sam Sughrue, Michael Cureus Neurosurgery Background: Keyhole craniotomies are increasingly being used for lesions of the skull base. Here we review our recent experience with these approaches for resection of intracranial meningiomas. Methods: Clinical and operative data were gathered on all patients treated with keyhole approaches by the senior author from January 2012 to June 2013. Thirty-one meningiomas were resected in 27 patients, including 9 supratentorial, 5 anterior fossa, 7 middle fossa, 6 posterior fossa, and 4 complex skull base tumors. Twenty-nine tumors were WHO Grade I, and 2 were Grade II. Results: The mean operative time was 8 hours, 22 minutes (range, 2:55-16:14) for skull-base tumors, and 4 hours, 27 minutes (range, 1:45-7:13) for supratentorial tumors. Simpson Resection grades were as follows: Grade I = 8, II = 8, III = 1, IV = 15, V = 0. The median postoperative hospital stay was 4 days (range, 1-20 days). In the 9 patients presenting with some degree of visual loss, 7 saw improvement or complete resolution. In the 6 patients presenting with cranial nerve palsies, 4 experienced improvement or resolution of the deficit postoperatively. Four patients experienced new neurologic deficits, all of which were improved or resolved at the time of the last follow-up. Technical aspects and surgical nuances of these approaches for management of intracranial meningiomas are discussed. Conclusions: With careful preoperative evaluation, keyhole approaches can be utilized singly or in combination to manage meningiomas in a wide variety of locations with satisfactory results. Cureus 2016-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4889455/ /pubmed/27284496 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.588 Text en Copyright © 2016, Burks et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Neurosurgery Burks, Joshua D Conner, Andrew K Bonney, Phillip A Archer, Jacob B Christensen, Blake Smith, Jacqueline Safavi-Abbasi, Sam Sughrue, Michael Management of Intracranial Meningiomas Using Keyhole Techniques |
title | Management of Intracranial Meningiomas Using Keyhole Techniques |
title_full | Management of Intracranial Meningiomas Using Keyhole Techniques |
title_fullStr | Management of Intracranial Meningiomas Using Keyhole Techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | Management of Intracranial Meningiomas Using Keyhole Techniques |
title_short | Management of Intracranial Meningiomas Using Keyhole Techniques |
title_sort | management of intracranial meningiomas using keyhole techniques |
topic | Neurosurgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4889455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27284496 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.588 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burksjoshuad managementofintracranialmeningiomasusingkeyholetechniques AT connerandrewk managementofintracranialmeningiomasusingkeyholetechniques AT bonneyphillipa managementofintracranialmeningiomasusingkeyholetechniques AT archerjacobb managementofintracranialmeningiomasusingkeyholetechniques AT christensenblake managementofintracranialmeningiomasusingkeyholetechniques AT smithjacqueline managementofintracranialmeningiomasusingkeyholetechniques AT safaviabbasisam managementofintracranialmeningiomasusingkeyholetechniques AT sughruemichael managementofintracranialmeningiomasusingkeyholetechniques |