Cargando…

A review of the assessment and prevalence of sedentarism in older adults, its physiology/health impact and non-exercise mobility counter-measures

This literature review focuses on aspects of sedentary behaviour (SB) in elderly. Since it has been identified as a distinct health risk, independent of physical activity, SB is a significant issue. This is particularly true for an ageing population as evidence shows that older adults (aged ≥65 year...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wullems, Jorgen A., Verschueren, Sabine M. P., Degens, Hans, Morse, Christopher I., Onambélé, Gladys L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4889631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26972899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10522-016-9640-1
_version_ 1782434991880273920
author Wullems, Jorgen A.
Verschueren, Sabine M. P.
Degens, Hans
Morse, Christopher I.
Onambélé, Gladys L.
author_facet Wullems, Jorgen A.
Verschueren, Sabine M. P.
Degens, Hans
Morse, Christopher I.
Onambélé, Gladys L.
author_sort Wullems, Jorgen A.
collection PubMed
description This literature review focuses on aspects of sedentary behaviour (SB) in elderly. Since it has been identified as a distinct health risk, independent of physical activity, SB is a significant issue. This is particularly true for an ageing population as evidence shows that older adults (aged ≥65 years) are the most sedentary age group (on average 8.5–9.6 h daily sitting time). Accurate SB assessment is important for understanding this habitual behaviour and its impact. However, SB measurement is challenging, regardless of the method used. Although negative associations of SB in elderly have been reported for several health outcomes, evidence is inconclusive, apart from the evidence on the adverse SB effect on the all-cause mortality rate. Generally, strategies have been proposed to counteract SB, of which breaking prolonged sedentary bouts with at least light-intensity physical activity seems to be the most promising. Overall, further research in elderly is required to increase the evidence and to either support or refute the current findings. Moreover, further research will help to develop informed SB guidelines for an optimal strategy to counteract SB and its health effects in older adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4889631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48896312016-06-17 A review of the assessment and prevalence of sedentarism in older adults, its physiology/health impact and non-exercise mobility counter-measures Wullems, Jorgen A. Verschueren, Sabine M. P. Degens, Hans Morse, Christopher I. Onambélé, Gladys L. Biogerontology Review Article This literature review focuses on aspects of sedentary behaviour (SB) in elderly. Since it has been identified as a distinct health risk, independent of physical activity, SB is a significant issue. This is particularly true for an ageing population as evidence shows that older adults (aged ≥65 years) are the most sedentary age group (on average 8.5–9.6 h daily sitting time). Accurate SB assessment is important for understanding this habitual behaviour and its impact. However, SB measurement is challenging, regardless of the method used. Although negative associations of SB in elderly have been reported for several health outcomes, evidence is inconclusive, apart from the evidence on the adverse SB effect on the all-cause mortality rate. Generally, strategies have been proposed to counteract SB, of which breaking prolonged sedentary bouts with at least light-intensity physical activity seems to be the most promising. Overall, further research in elderly is required to increase the evidence and to either support or refute the current findings. Moreover, further research will help to develop informed SB guidelines for an optimal strategy to counteract SB and its health effects in older adults. Springer Netherlands 2016-03-14 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4889631/ /pubmed/26972899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10522-016-9640-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review Article
Wullems, Jorgen A.
Verschueren, Sabine M. P.
Degens, Hans
Morse, Christopher I.
Onambélé, Gladys L.
A review of the assessment and prevalence of sedentarism in older adults, its physiology/health impact and non-exercise mobility counter-measures
title A review of the assessment and prevalence of sedentarism in older adults, its physiology/health impact and non-exercise mobility counter-measures
title_full A review of the assessment and prevalence of sedentarism in older adults, its physiology/health impact and non-exercise mobility counter-measures
title_fullStr A review of the assessment and prevalence of sedentarism in older adults, its physiology/health impact and non-exercise mobility counter-measures
title_full_unstemmed A review of the assessment and prevalence of sedentarism in older adults, its physiology/health impact and non-exercise mobility counter-measures
title_short A review of the assessment and prevalence of sedentarism in older adults, its physiology/health impact and non-exercise mobility counter-measures
title_sort review of the assessment and prevalence of sedentarism in older adults, its physiology/health impact and non-exercise mobility counter-measures
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4889631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26972899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10522-016-9640-1
work_keys_str_mv AT wullemsjorgena areviewoftheassessmentandprevalenceofsedentarisminolderadultsitsphysiologyhealthimpactandnonexercisemobilitycountermeasures
AT verschuerensabinemp areviewoftheassessmentandprevalenceofsedentarisminolderadultsitsphysiologyhealthimpactandnonexercisemobilitycountermeasures
AT degenshans areviewoftheassessmentandprevalenceofsedentarisminolderadultsitsphysiologyhealthimpactandnonexercisemobilitycountermeasures
AT morsechristopheri areviewoftheassessmentandprevalenceofsedentarisminolderadultsitsphysiologyhealthimpactandnonexercisemobilitycountermeasures
AT onambelegladysl areviewoftheassessmentandprevalenceofsedentarisminolderadultsitsphysiologyhealthimpactandnonexercisemobilitycountermeasures
AT wullemsjorgena reviewoftheassessmentandprevalenceofsedentarisminolderadultsitsphysiologyhealthimpactandnonexercisemobilitycountermeasures
AT verschuerensabinemp reviewoftheassessmentandprevalenceofsedentarisminolderadultsitsphysiologyhealthimpactandnonexercisemobilitycountermeasures
AT degenshans reviewoftheassessmentandprevalenceofsedentarisminolderadultsitsphysiologyhealthimpactandnonexercisemobilitycountermeasures
AT morsechristopheri reviewoftheassessmentandprevalenceofsedentarisminolderadultsitsphysiologyhealthimpactandnonexercisemobilitycountermeasures
AT onambelegladysl reviewoftheassessmentandprevalenceofsedentarisminolderadultsitsphysiologyhealthimpactandnonexercisemobilitycountermeasures