Cargando…
Clinical evaluation of the AutoPulse automated chest compression device for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the northern district of Shanghai, China
INTRODUCTION: Whether the AutoPulse automated chest compression device is worthy of clinical use for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains controversial. A prospective controlled study was conducted to evaluate the effect of AutoPulse versus manual chest compression for cardiopulmonary resus...
Autores principales: | Gao, Chengjin, Chen, Yuanzhuo, Peng, Hu, Chen, Yanqing, Zhuang, Yugang, Zhou, Shuqin |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4889691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27279849 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2016.59930 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Efficacy of AutoPulse for Mechanical Chest Compression in Patients with Shock-Resistant Ventricular Fibrillation
por: Gorący, Jarosław, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Safety of mechanical chest compression devices AutoPulse and LUCAS in cardiac arrest: a randomized clinical trial for non-inferiority
por: Koster, Rudolph W, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Mechanische CPR (AutoPulse™) in Bauchlage, machbar?
por: Pietsch, U., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Comparison of in-hospital use of mechanical chest compression devices for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: AUTOPULSE vs LUCAS
por: Kim, Hyun Tae, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Arterial blood pressure differences between AutoPulse™ and Lucas2™during mechanic cardiopulmonary resuscitation
por: Frey, Manuel, et al.
Publicado: (2016)