Cargando…

Reciprocating vs Rotary Instrumentation in Pediatric Endodontics: Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Deciduous Root Canals using Two Single-file Systems

Background: Primary root canals are considered to be most challenging due to their complex anatomy. "Wave one" and "one shape" are single-file systems with reciprocating and rotary motion respectively. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare dentin thickness, centering...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prabhakar, Attiguppe R, Yavagal, Chandrashekar, Dixit, Kratika, Naik, Saraswathi V
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4890062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27274155
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1332
_version_ 1782435062228189184
author Prabhakar, Attiguppe R
Yavagal, Chandrashekar
Dixit, Kratika
Naik, Saraswathi V
author_facet Prabhakar, Attiguppe R
Yavagal, Chandrashekar
Dixit, Kratika
Naik, Saraswathi V
author_sort Prabhakar, Attiguppe R
collection PubMed
description Background: Primary root canals are considered to be most challenging due to their complex anatomy. "Wave one" and "one shape" are single-file systems with reciprocating and rotary motion respectively. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare dentin thickness, centering ability, canal transportation, and instrumentation time of wave one and one shape files in primary root canals using a cone beam computed tomographic (CBCT) analysis. Study design: This is an experimental, in vitro study comparing the two groups. Materials and methods: A total of 24 extracted human primary teeth with minimum 7 mm root length were included in the study. Cone beam computed tomographic images were taken before and after the instrumentation for each group. Dentin thickness, centering ability, canal transportation, and instrumentation times were evaluated for each group. Results: A significant difference was found in instrumentation time and canal transportation measures between the two groups. Wave one showed less canal transportation as compared with one shape, and the mean instrumentation time of wave one was significantly less than one shape. Conclusion: Reciprocating single-file systems was found to be faster with much less procedural errors and can hence be recommended for shaping the root canals of primary teeth. How to cite this article: Prabhakar AR, Yavagal C, Dixit K, Naik SV. Reciprocating vs Rotary Instrumentation in Pediatric Endodontics: Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Deciduous Root Canals using Two Single-File Systems. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2016;9(1):45-49.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4890062
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48900622016-06-07 Reciprocating vs Rotary Instrumentation in Pediatric Endodontics: Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Deciduous Root Canals using Two Single-file Systems Prabhakar, Attiguppe R Yavagal, Chandrashekar Dixit, Kratika Naik, Saraswathi V Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Article Background: Primary root canals are considered to be most challenging due to their complex anatomy. "Wave one" and "one shape" are single-file systems with reciprocating and rotary motion respectively. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare dentin thickness, centering ability, canal transportation, and instrumentation time of wave one and one shape files in primary root canals using a cone beam computed tomographic (CBCT) analysis. Study design: This is an experimental, in vitro study comparing the two groups. Materials and methods: A total of 24 extracted human primary teeth with minimum 7 mm root length were included in the study. Cone beam computed tomographic images were taken before and after the instrumentation for each group. Dentin thickness, centering ability, canal transportation, and instrumentation times were evaluated for each group. Results: A significant difference was found in instrumentation time and canal transportation measures between the two groups. Wave one showed less canal transportation as compared with one shape, and the mean instrumentation time of wave one was significantly less than one shape. Conclusion: Reciprocating single-file systems was found to be faster with much less procedural errors and can hence be recommended for shaping the root canals of primary teeth. How to cite this article: Prabhakar AR, Yavagal C, Dixit K, Naik SV. Reciprocating vs Rotary Instrumentation in Pediatric Endodontics: Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Deciduous Root Canals using Two Single-File Systems. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2016;9(1):45-49. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2016 2016-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4890062/ /pubmed/27274155 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1332 Text en Copyright © 2016; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Prabhakar, Attiguppe R
Yavagal, Chandrashekar
Dixit, Kratika
Naik, Saraswathi V
Reciprocating vs Rotary Instrumentation in Pediatric Endodontics: Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Deciduous Root Canals using Two Single-file Systems
title Reciprocating vs Rotary Instrumentation in Pediatric Endodontics: Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Deciduous Root Canals using Two Single-file Systems
title_full Reciprocating vs Rotary Instrumentation in Pediatric Endodontics: Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Deciduous Root Canals using Two Single-file Systems
title_fullStr Reciprocating vs Rotary Instrumentation in Pediatric Endodontics: Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Deciduous Root Canals using Two Single-file Systems
title_full_unstemmed Reciprocating vs Rotary Instrumentation in Pediatric Endodontics: Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Deciduous Root Canals using Two Single-file Systems
title_short Reciprocating vs Rotary Instrumentation in Pediatric Endodontics: Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Deciduous Root Canals using Two Single-file Systems
title_sort reciprocating vs rotary instrumentation in pediatric endodontics: cone beam computed tomographic analysis of deciduous root canals using two single-file systems
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4890062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27274155
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1332
work_keys_str_mv AT prabhakarattigupper reciprocatingvsrotaryinstrumentationinpediatricendodonticsconebeamcomputedtomographicanalysisofdeciduousrootcanalsusingtwosinglefilesystems
AT yavagalchandrashekar reciprocatingvsrotaryinstrumentationinpediatricendodonticsconebeamcomputedtomographicanalysisofdeciduousrootcanalsusingtwosinglefilesystems
AT dixitkratika reciprocatingvsrotaryinstrumentationinpediatricendodonticsconebeamcomputedtomographicanalysisofdeciduousrootcanalsusingtwosinglefilesystems
AT naiksaraswathiv reciprocatingvsrotaryinstrumentationinpediatricendodonticsconebeamcomputedtomographicanalysisofdeciduousrootcanalsusingtwosinglefilesystems