Cargando…

The Respiratory Protection Effectiveness Clinical Trial (ResPECT): a cluster-randomized comparison of respirator and medical mask effectiveness against respiratory infections in healthcare personnel

BACKGROUND: Although N95 filtering facepiece respirators and medical masks are commonly used for protection against respiratory infections in healthcare settings, more clinical evidence is needed to understand the optimal settings and exposure circumstances for healthcare personnel to use these devi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Radonovich, Lewis J., Bessesen, Mary T., Cummings, Derek A., Eagan, Aaron, Gaydos, Charlotte, Gibert, Cynthia, Gorse, Geoffrey J., Nyquist, Ann-Christine, Reich, Nicholas G., Rodrigues-Barradas, Maria, Savor-Price, Connie, Shaffer, Ronald E., Simberkoff, Michael S., Perl, Trish M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4890247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27255755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1494-2
_version_ 1782435086454489088
author Radonovich, Lewis J.
Bessesen, Mary T.
Cummings, Derek A.
Eagan, Aaron
Gaydos, Charlotte
Gibert, Cynthia
Gorse, Geoffrey J.
Nyquist, Ann-Christine
Reich, Nicholas G.
Rodrigues-Barradas, Maria
Savor-Price, Connie
Shaffer, Ronald E.
Simberkoff, Michael S.
Perl, Trish M.
author_facet Radonovich, Lewis J.
Bessesen, Mary T.
Cummings, Derek A.
Eagan, Aaron
Gaydos, Charlotte
Gibert, Cynthia
Gorse, Geoffrey J.
Nyquist, Ann-Christine
Reich, Nicholas G.
Rodrigues-Barradas, Maria
Savor-Price, Connie
Shaffer, Ronald E.
Simberkoff, Michael S.
Perl, Trish M.
author_sort Radonovich, Lewis J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although N95 filtering facepiece respirators and medical masks are commonly used for protection against respiratory infections in healthcare settings, more clinical evidence is needed to understand the optimal settings and exposure circumstances for healthcare personnel to use these devices. A lack of clinically germane research has led to equivocal, and occasionally conflicting, healthcare respiratory protection recommendations from public health organizations, professional societies, and experts. METHODS: The Respiratory Protection Effectiveness Clinical Trial (ResPECT) is a prospective comparison of respiratory protective equipment to be conducted at multiple U.S. study sites. Healthcare personnel who work in outpatient settings will be cluster-randomized to wear N95 respirators or medical masks for protection against infections during respiratory virus season. Outcome measures will include laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infections, acute respiratory illness, and influenza-like illness. Participant exposures to patients, coworkers, and others with symptoms and signs of respiratory infection, both within and beyond the workplace, will be recorded in daily diaries. Adherence to study protocols will be monitored by the study team. DISCUSSION: ResPECT is designed to better understand the extent to which N95s and MMs reduce clinical illness among healthcare personnel. A fully successful study would produce clinically relevant results that help clinician-leaders make reasoned decisions about protection of healthcare personnel against occupationally acquired respiratory infections and prevention of spread within healthcare systems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT01249625 (11/29/2010).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4890247
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48902472016-06-09 The Respiratory Protection Effectiveness Clinical Trial (ResPECT): a cluster-randomized comparison of respirator and medical mask effectiveness against respiratory infections in healthcare personnel Radonovich, Lewis J. Bessesen, Mary T. Cummings, Derek A. Eagan, Aaron Gaydos, Charlotte Gibert, Cynthia Gorse, Geoffrey J. Nyquist, Ann-Christine Reich, Nicholas G. Rodrigues-Barradas, Maria Savor-Price, Connie Shaffer, Ronald E. Simberkoff, Michael S. Perl, Trish M. BMC Infect Dis Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Although N95 filtering facepiece respirators and medical masks are commonly used for protection against respiratory infections in healthcare settings, more clinical evidence is needed to understand the optimal settings and exposure circumstances for healthcare personnel to use these devices. A lack of clinically germane research has led to equivocal, and occasionally conflicting, healthcare respiratory protection recommendations from public health organizations, professional societies, and experts. METHODS: The Respiratory Protection Effectiveness Clinical Trial (ResPECT) is a prospective comparison of respiratory protective equipment to be conducted at multiple U.S. study sites. Healthcare personnel who work in outpatient settings will be cluster-randomized to wear N95 respirators or medical masks for protection against infections during respiratory virus season. Outcome measures will include laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infections, acute respiratory illness, and influenza-like illness. Participant exposures to patients, coworkers, and others with symptoms and signs of respiratory infection, both within and beyond the workplace, will be recorded in daily diaries. Adherence to study protocols will be monitored by the study team. DISCUSSION: ResPECT is designed to better understand the extent to which N95s and MMs reduce clinical illness among healthcare personnel. A fully successful study would produce clinically relevant results that help clinician-leaders make reasoned decisions about protection of healthcare personnel against occupationally acquired respiratory infections and prevention of spread within healthcare systems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT01249625 (11/29/2010). BioMed Central 2016-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4890247/ /pubmed/27255755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1494-2 Text en © Radonovich et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Radonovich, Lewis J.
Bessesen, Mary T.
Cummings, Derek A.
Eagan, Aaron
Gaydos, Charlotte
Gibert, Cynthia
Gorse, Geoffrey J.
Nyquist, Ann-Christine
Reich, Nicholas G.
Rodrigues-Barradas, Maria
Savor-Price, Connie
Shaffer, Ronald E.
Simberkoff, Michael S.
Perl, Trish M.
The Respiratory Protection Effectiveness Clinical Trial (ResPECT): a cluster-randomized comparison of respirator and medical mask effectiveness against respiratory infections in healthcare personnel
title The Respiratory Protection Effectiveness Clinical Trial (ResPECT): a cluster-randomized comparison of respirator and medical mask effectiveness against respiratory infections in healthcare personnel
title_full The Respiratory Protection Effectiveness Clinical Trial (ResPECT): a cluster-randomized comparison of respirator and medical mask effectiveness against respiratory infections in healthcare personnel
title_fullStr The Respiratory Protection Effectiveness Clinical Trial (ResPECT): a cluster-randomized comparison of respirator and medical mask effectiveness against respiratory infections in healthcare personnel
title_full_unstemmed The Respiratory Protection Effectiveness Clinical Trial (ResPECT): a cluster-randomized comparison of respirator and medical mask effectiveness against respiratory infections in healthcare personnel
title_short The Respiratory Protection Effectiveness Clinical Trial (ResPECT): a cluster-randomized comparison of respirator and medical mask effectiveness against respiratory infections in healthcare personnel
title_sort respiratory protection effectiveness clinical trial (respect): a cluster-randomized comparison of respirator and medical mask effectiveness against respiratory infections in healthcare personnel
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4890247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27255755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1494-2
work_keys_str_mv AT radonovichlewisj therespiratoryprotectioneffectivenessclinicaltrialrespectaclusterrandomizedcomparisonofrespiratorandmedicalmaskeffectivenessagainstrespiratoryinfectionsinhealthcarepersonnel
AT bessesenmaryt therespiratoryprotectioneffectivenessclinicaltrialrespectaclusterrandomizedcomparisonofrespiratorandmedicalmaskeffectivenessagainstrespiratoryinfectionsinhealthcarepersonnel
AT cummingsdereka therespiratoryprotectioneffectivenessclinicaltrialrespectaclusterrandomizedcomparisonofrespiratorandmedicalmaskeffectivenessagainstrespiratoryinfectionsinhealthcarepersonnel
AT eaganaaron therespiratoryprotectioneffectivenessclinicaltrialrespectaclusterrandomizedcomparisonofrespiratorandmedicalmaskeffectivenessagainstrespiratoryinfectionsinhealthcarepersonnel
AT gaydoscharlotte therespiratoryprotectioneffectivenessclinicaltrialrespectaclusterrandomizedcomparisonofrespiratorandmedicalmaskeffectivenessagainstrespiratoryinfectionsinhealthcarepersonnel
AT gibertcynthia therespiratoryprotectioneffectivenessclinicaltrialrespectaclusterrandomizedcomparisonofrespiratorandmedicalmaskeffectivenessagainstrespiratoryinfectionsinhealthcarepersonnel
AT gorsegeoffreyj therespiratoryprotectioneffectivenessclinicaltrialrespectaclusterrandomizedcomparisonofrespiratorandmedicalmaskeffectivenessagainstrespiratoryinfectionsinhealthcarepersonnel
AT nyquistannchristine therespiratoryprotectioneffectivenessclinicaltrialrespectaclusterrandomizedcomparisonofrespiratorandmedicalmaskeffectivenessagainstrespiratoryinfectionsinhealthcarepersonnel
AT reichnicholasg therespiratoryprotectioneffectivenessclinicaltrialrespectaclusterrandomizedcomparisonofrespiratorandmedicalmaskeffectivenessagainstrespiratoryinfectionsinhealthcarepersonnel
AT rodriguesbarradasmaria therespiratoryprotectioneffectivenessclinicaltrialrespectaclusterrandomizedcomparisonofrespiratorandmedicalmaskeffectivenessagainstrespiratoryinfectionsinhealthcarepersonnel
AT savorpriceconnie therespiratoryprotectioneffectivenessclinicaltrialrespectaclusterrandomizedcomparisonofrespiratorandmedicalmaskeffectivenessagainstrespiratoryinfectionsinhealthcarepersonnel
AT shafferronalde therespiratoryprotectioneffectivenessclinicaltrialrespectaclusterrandomizedcomparisonofrespiratorandmedicalmaskeffectivenessagainstrespiratoryinfectionsinhealthcarepersonnel
AT simberkoffmichaels therespiratoryprotectioneffectivenessclinicaltrialrespectaclusterrandomizedcomparisonofrespiratorandmedicalmaskeffectivenessagainstrespiratoryinfectionsinhealthcarepersonnel
AT perltrishm therespiratoryprotectioneffectivenessclinicaltrialrespectaclusterrandomizedcomparisonofrespiratorandmedicalmaskeffectivenessagainstrespiratoryinfectionsinhealthcarepersonnel
AT radonovichlewisj respiratoryprotectioneffectivenessclinicaltrialrespectaclusterrandomizedcomparisonofrespiratorandmedicalmaskeffectivenessagainstrespiratoryinfectionsinhealthcarepersonnel
AT bessesenmaryt respiratoryprotectioneffectivenessclinicaltrialrespectaclusterrandomizedcomparisonofrespiratorandmedicalmaskeffectivenessagainstrespiratoryinfectionsinhealthcarepersonnel
AT cummingsdereka respiratoryprotectioneffectivenessclinicaltrialrespectaclusterrandomizedcomparisonofrespiratorandmedicalmaskeffectivenessagainstrespiratoryinfectionsinhealthcarepersonnel
AT eaganaaron respiratoryprotectioneffectivenessclinicaltrialrespectaclusterrandomizedcomparisonofrespiratorandmedicalmaskeffectivenessagainstrespiratoryinfectionsinhealthcarepersonnel
AT gaydoscharlotte respiratoryprotectioneffectivenessclinicaltrialrespectaclusterrandomizedcomparisonofrespiratorandmedicalmaskeffectivenessagainstrespiratoryinfectionsinhealthcarepersonnel
AT gibertcynthia respiratoryprotectioneffectivenessclinicaltrialrespectaclusterrandomizedcomparisonofrespiratorandmedicalmaskeffectivenessagainstrespiratoryinfectionsinhealthcarepersonnel
AT gorsegeoffreyj respiratoryprotectioneffectivenessclinicaltrialrespectaclusterrandomizedcomparisonofrespiratorandmedicalmaskeffectivenessagainstrespiratoryinfectionsinhealthcarepersonnel
AT nyquistannchristine respiratoryprotectioneffectivenessclinicaltrialrespectaclusterrandomizedcomparisonofrespiratorandmedicalmaskeffectivenessagainstrespiratoryinfectionsinhealthcarepersonnel
AT reichnicholasg respiratoryprotectioneffectivenessclinicaltrialrespectaclusterrandomizedcomparisonofrespiratorandmedicalmaskeffectivenessagainstrespiratoryinfectionsinhealthcarepersonnel
AT rodriguesbarradasmaria respiratoryprotectioneffectivenessclinicaltrialrespectaclusterrandomizedcomparisonofrespiratorandmedicalmaskeffectivenessagainstrespiratoryinfectionsinhealthcarepersonnel
AT savorpriceconnie respiratoryprotectioneffectivenessclinicaltrialrespectaclusterrandomizedcomparisonofrespiratorandmedicalmaskeffectivenessagainstrespiratoryinfectionsinhealthcarepersonnel
AT shafferronalde respiratoryprotectioneffectivenessclinicaltrialrespectaclusterrandomizedcomparisonofrespiratorandmedicalmaskeffectivenessagainstrespiratoryinfectionsinhealthcarepersonnel
AT simberkoffmichaels respiratoryprotectioneffectivenessclinicaltrialrespectaclusterrandomizedcomparisonofrespiratorandmedicalmaskeffectivenessagainstrespiratoryinfectionsinhealthcarepersonnel
AT perltrishm respiratoryprotectioneffectivenessclinicaltrialrespectaclusterrandomizedcomparisonofrespiratorandmedicalmaskeffectivenessagainstrespiratoryinfectionsinhealthcarepersonnel