Cargando…

Cyclophosphamide versus mycophenolate mofetil in scleroderma interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) as induction therapy: a single-centre, retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND: Scleroderma is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized mainly by skin manifestations and involvement of various visceral organs, especially the lungs. Lung involvement is the leading cause of mortality in patients with scleroderma. There are data to suggest that cyclophosphamide (CYC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shenoy, Padmanabha D., Bavaliya, Manish, Sashidharan, Sujith, Nalianda, Kaveri, Sreenath, Sreelakshmi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4890256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27255492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-016-1015-0
_version_ 1782435088538009600
author Shenoy, Padmanabha D.
Bavaliya, Manish
Sashidharan, Sujith
Nalianda, Kaveri
Sreenath, Sreelakshmi
author_facet Shenoy, Padmanabha D.
Bavaliya, Manish
Sashidharan, Sujith
Nalianda, Kaveri
Sreenath, Sreelakshmi
author_sort Shenoy, Padmanabha D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Scleroderma is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized mainly by skin manifestations and involvement of various visceral organs, especially the lungs. Lung involvement is the leading cause of mortality in patients with scleroderma. There are data to suggest that cyclophosphamide (CYC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are effective in the management of scleroderma interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) but no head to head comparative data are available to date. METHODS: For the last 3 years, patients with SSc-ILD have been treated at our centre by protocol-based administration of intravenous CYC and MMF. Results of lung function tests (spirometry) were recorded at baseline, 3 months and 6 months in every patient. The clinical records of patients with systemic sclerosis and significant ILD, who were not previously exposed to any immunosuppressant and were treated with MMF OR CYC, were reviewed. The efficacy of treatment was assessed by the change in forced vital capacity on spirometry. RESULTS: Of the total 57 patients included in the analysis, 34 were treated with MMF and 23 were treated with CYC. Mean duration of illness was 4.19 ± 2.82 years in the MMF and 6.04 ± 5.96 years in the CYC group. After 6 months of therapy, FVC increased by 10.84 ± 13.81 % in the CYC group and by 6.07 ± 11.92 % in the MMF group. This improvement from baseline was statistically significant in both groups (P < 0.01). The improvement was comparable with no statistically significant differences between groups (P = 0.373). There were no major adverse events reported in either arm. CONCLUSION: Both MMF and CYC were equally effective in stabilizing lung function in patients with scleroderma and ILD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4890256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48902562016-06-03 Cyclophosphamide versus mycophenolate mofetil in scleroderma interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) as induction therapy: a single-centre, retrospective analysis Shenoy, Padmanabha D. Bavaliya, Manish Sashidharan, Sujith Nalianda, Kaveri Sreenath, Sreelakshmi Arthritis Res Ther Research Article BACKGROUND: Scleroderma is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized mainly by skin manifestations and involvement of various visceral organs, especially the lungs. Lung involvement is the leading cause of mortality in patients with scleroderma. There are data to suggest that cyclophosphamide (CYC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are effective in the management of scleroderma interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) but no head to head comparative data are available to date. METHODS: For the last 3 years, patients with SSc-ILD have been treated at our centre by protocol-based administration of intravenous CYC and MMF. Results of lung function tests (spirometry) were recorded at baseline, 3 months and 6 months in every patient. The clinical records of patients with systemic sclerosis and significant ILD, who were not previously exposed to any immunosuppressant and were treated with MMF OR CYC, were reviewed. The efficacy of treatment was assessed by the change in forced vital capacity on spirometry. RESULTS: Of the total 57 patients included in the analysis, 34 were treated with MMF and 23 were treated with CYC. Mean duration of illness was 4.19 ± 2.82 years in the MMF and 6.04 ± 5.96 years in the CYC group. After 6 months of therapy, FVC increased by 10.84 ± 13.81 % in the CYC group and by 6.07 ± 11.92 % in the MMF group. This improvement from baseline was statistically significant in both groups (P < 0.01). The improvement was comparable with no statistically significant differences between groups (P = 0.373). There were no major adverse events reported in either arm. CONCLUSION: Both MMF and CYC were equally effective in stabilizing lung function in patients with scleroderma and ILD. BioMed Central 2016-06-02 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4890256/ /pubmed/27255492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-016-1015-0 Text en © Shenoy et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shenoy, Padmanabha D.
Bavaliya, Manish
Sashidharan, Sujith
Nalianda, Kaveri
Sreenath, Sreelakshmi
Cyclophosphamide versus mycophenolate mofetil in scleroderma interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) as induction therapy: a single-centre, retrospective analysis
title Cyclophosphamide versus mycophenolate mofetil in scleroderma interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) as induction therapy: a single-centre, retrospective analysis
title_full Cyclophosphamide versus mycophenolate mofetil in scleroderma interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) as induction therapy: a single-centre, retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Cyclophosphamide versus mycophenolate mofetil in scleroderma interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) as induction therapy: a single-centre, retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Cyclophosphamide versus mycophenolate mofetil in scleroderma interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) as induction therapy: a single-centre, retrospective analysis
title_short Cyclophosphamide versus mycophenolate mofetil in scleroderma interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) as induction therapy: a single-centre, retrospective analysis
title_sort cyclophosphamide versus mycophenolate mofetil in scleroderma interstitial lung disease (ssc-ild) as induction therapy: a single-centre, retrospective analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4890256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27255492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-016-1015-0
work_keys_str_mv AT shenoypadmanabhad cyclophosphamideversusmycophenolatemofetilinsclerodermainterstitiallungdiseasesscildasinductiontherapyasinglecentreretrospectiveanalysis
AT bavaliyamanish cyclophosphamideversusmycophenolatemofetilinsclerodermainterstitiallungdiseasesscildasinductiontherapyasinglecentreretrospectiveanalysis
AT sashidharansujith cyclophosphamideversusmycophenolatemofetilinsclerodermainterstitiallungdiseasesscildasinductiontherapyasinglecentreretrospectiveanalysis
AT naliandakaveri cyclophosphamideversusmycophenolatemofetilinsclerodermainterstitiallungdiseasesscildasinductiontherapyasinglecentreretrospectiveanalysis
AT sreenathsreelakshmi cyclophosphamideversusmycophenolatemofetilinsclerodermainterstitiallungdiseasesscildasinductiontherapyasinglecentreretrospectiveanalysis