Cargando…

Impact of Room Location on UV-C Irradiance and UV-C Dosage and Antimicrobial Effect Delivered by a Mobile UV-C Light Device

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate ultraviolet C (UV-C) irradiance, UV-C dosage, and antimicrobial effect achieved by a mobile continuous UV-C device. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. METHODS: We used 6 UV light sensors to determine UV-C irradiance (W/cm(2)) and UV-C dosage (µWsec/cm(2)) at various dist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boyce, John M., Farrel, Patricia A., Towle, Dana, Fekieta, Renee, Aniskiewicz, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4890342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27004524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ice.2016.35
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate ultraviolet C (UV-C) irradiance, UV-C dosage, and antimicrobial effect achieved by a mobile continuous UV-C device. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. METHODS: We used 6 UV light sensors to determine UV-C irradiance (W/cm(2)) and UV-C dosage (µWsec/cm(2)) at various distances from and orientations relative to the UV-C device during 5-minute and 15-minute cycles in an ICU room and a surgical ward room. In both rooms, stainless-steel disks inoculated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), and Clostridium difficile spores were placed next to sensors, and UV-C dosages and log(10) reductions of target organisms achieved during 5-minute and 15-minute cycles were determined. Mean irradiance and dosage readings were compared using ANOVA. RESULTS: Mean UV-C irradiance was nearly 1.0E-03 W/cm(2) in direct sight at a distance of 1.3 m (4 ft) from the device but was 1.12E-05 W/cm(2) on a horizontal surface in a shaded area 3.3 m (10 ft) from the device (P<.001). Mean UV-C dosages received by UV-C sensors located at different distances and orientation relative to the device varied significantly during 5-minute cycles and during 15-minute cycles (P<.001). Log(10) reductions ranged from >4 to 1–3 for MRSA, >4 to 1–2 for VRE and >4 to 0 log(10) for C. difficile spores, depending on the distance from, and orientation relative to, the device with 5-minute and 15-minute cycles. CONCLUSION: UV-C irradiance, dosage, and antimicrobial effect received from a mobile UV-C device varied substantially based on location in a room relative to the UV-C device. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:667–672