Cargando…

Improving patient safety in cardiothoracic surgery: an audit of surgical handover in a tertiary center

BACKGROUND: Novel research has revealed that the relative risk of death increased by 10% and 15% for admissions on a Saturday and Sunday, respectively. With an imminent threat of 7-day services in the National Health Service, including weekend operating lists, handover plays a pivotal role in ensuri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Bauer, Natasha Johan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4890690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27313484
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S107189
_version_ 1782435138487975936
author Bauer, Natasha Johan
author_facet Bauer, Natasha Johan
author_sort Bauer, Natasha Johan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Novel research has revealed that the relative risk of death increased by 10% and 15% for admissions on a Saturday and Sunday, respectively. With an imminent threat of 7-day services in the National Health Service, including weekend operating lists, handover plays a pivotal role in ensuring patient safety is paramount. This audit evaluated the quality, efficiency, and safety of surgical handover of pre- and postoperative cardiothoracic patients in a tertiary center against guidance on Safe Handover published by the Royal College of Surgeons of England and the British Medical Association. METHODS: A 16-item questionnaire prospectively audited the nature, time and duration of handover, patient details, operative history and current clinical status, interruptions during handover, and difficulties cross-covering specialties over a month. RESULTS: Just over half (52%) of the time, no handover took place. The majority of handovers (64%) occurred over the phone; two-thirds of these were uninterrupted. All handovers were less than 10 minutes in duration. About half of the time, the senior house officer had previously met the registrar involved in the handover, but the overwhelming majority felt it would facilitate the handover process if they had prior contact. Patient details handed over 100% of the time included name, ward, and current clinical diagnosis. A third of the time, the patient’s age, responsible consultant, and recent operations or procedures were not handed over, potentially compromising future management due to delays and lack of relevant information. Perhaps the most revealing result was that the overall safety of handover was perceived to be five out of ten, with ten being very safe with no aspects felt to impact negatively on optimal patient care. CONCLUSION: These findings were presented to the department, and a handover proforma was implemented. Recommendations included the need for a new face-to-face handover. A reaudit will evaluate the effects of these changes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4890690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48906902016-06-16 Improving patient safety in cardiothoracic surgery: an audit of surgical handover in a tertiary center Bauer, Natasha Johan Adv Med Educ Pract Original Research BACKGROUND: Novel research has revealed that the relative risk of death increased by 10% and 15% for admissions on a Saturday and Sunday, respectively. With an imminent threat of 7-day services in the National Health Service, including weekend operating lists, handover plays a pivotal role in ensuring patient safety is paramount. This audit evaluated the quality, efficiency, and safety of surgical handover of pre- and postoperative cardiothoracic patients in a tertiary center against guidance on Safe Handover published by the Royal College of Surgeons of England and the British Medical Association. METHODS: A 16-item questionnaire prospectively audited the nature, time and duration of handover, patient details, operative history and current clinical status, interruptions during handover, and difficulties cross-covering specialties over a month. RESULTS: Just over half (52%) of the time, no handover took place. The majority of handovers (64%) occurred over the phone; two-thirds of these were uninterrupted. All handovers were less than 10 minutes in duration. About half of the time, the senior house officer had previously met the registrar involved in the handover, but the overwhelming majority felt it would facilitate the handover process if they had prior contact. Patient details handed over 100% of the time included name, ward, and current clinical diagnosis. A third of the time, the patient’s age, responsible consultant, and recent operations or procedures were not handed over, potentially compromising future management due to delays and lack of relevant information. Perhaps the most revealing result was that the overall safety of handover was perceived to be five out of ten, with ten being very safe with no aspects felt to impact negatively on optimal patient care. CONCLUSION: These findings were presented to the department, and a handover proforma was implemented. Recommendations included the need for a new face-to-face handover. A reaudit will evaluate the effects of these changes. Dove Medical Press 2016-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4890690/ /pubmed/27313484 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S107189 Text en © 2016 Bauer. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Bauer, Natasha Johan
Improving patient safety in cardiothoracic surgery: an audit of surgical handover in a tertiary center
title Improving patient safety in cardiothoracic surgery: an audit of surgical handover in a tertiary center
title_full Improving patient safety in cardiothoracic surgery: an audit of surgical handover in a tertiary center
title_fullStr Improving patient safety in cardiothoracic surgery: an audit of surgical handover in a tertiary center
title_full_unstemmed Improving patient safety in cardiothoracic surgery: an audit of surgical handover in a tertiary center
title_short Improving patient safety in cardiothoracic surgery: an audit of surgical handover in a tertiary center
title_sort improving patient safety in cardiothoracic surgery: an audit of surgical handover in a tertiary center
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4890690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27313484
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S107189
work_keys_str_mv AT bauernatashajohan improvingpatientsafetyincardiothoracicsurgeryanauditofsurgicalhandoverinatertiarycenter