Cargando…

Electronic Health Record-Related Safety Concerns: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Electronic Health Record Users

BACKGROUND: The rapid expansion in the use of electronic health records (EHR) has increased the number of medical errors originating in health information systems (HIS). The sociotechnical approach helps in understanding risks in the development, implementation, and use of EHR and health information...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palojoki, Sari, Pajunen, Tuuli, Saranto, Kaija, Lehtonen, Lasse
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Gunther Eysenbach 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4890731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27154599
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/medinform.5238
_version_ 1782435142147506176
author Palojoki, Sari
Pajunen, Tuuli
Saranto, Kaija
Lehtonen, Lasse
author_facet Palojoki, Sari
Pajunen, Tuuli
Saranto, Kaija
Lehtonen, Lasse
author_sort Palojoki, Sari
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The rapid expansion in the use of electronic health records (EHR) has increased the number of medical errors originating in health information systems (HIS). The sociotechnical approach helps in understanding risks in the development, implementation, and use of EHR and health information technology (HIT) while accounting for complex interactions of technology within the health care system. OBJECTIVE: This study addresses two important questions: (1) “which of the common EHR error types are associated with perceived high- and extreme-risk severity ratings among EHR users?”, and (2) “which variables are associated with high- and extreme-risk severity ratings?” METHODS: This study was a quantitative, non-experimental, descriptive study of EHR users. We conducted a cross-sectional web-based questionnaire study at the largest hospital district in Finland. Statistical tests included the reliability of the summative scales tested with Cronbach’s alpha. Logistic regression served to assess the association of the independent variables to each of the eight risk factors examined. RESULTS: A total of 2864 eligible respondents provided the final data. Almost half of the respondents reported a high level of risk related to the error type “extended EHR unavailability”. The lowest overall risk level was associated with “selecting incorrectly from a list of items”. In multivariate analyses, profession and clinical unit proved to be the strongest predictors for high perceived risk. Physicians perceived risk levels to be the highest (P<.001 in six of eight error types), while emergency departments, operating rooms, and procedure units were associated with higher perceived risk levels (P<.001 in four of eight error types). Previous participation in eLearning courses on EHR-use was associated with lower risk for some of the risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a large number of Finnish EHR users in hospitals, this study indicates that HIT safety hazards should be taken very seriously, particularly in operating rooms, procedure units, emergency departments, and intensive care units/critical care units. Health care organizations should use proactive and systematic assessments of EHR risks before harmful events occur. An EHR training program should be compulsory for all EHR users in order to address EHR safety concerns resulting from the failure to use HIT appropriately.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4890731
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Gunther Eysenbach
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48907312016-06-13 Electronic Health Record-Related Safety Concerns: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Electronic Health Record Users Palojoki, Sari Pajunen, Tuuli Saranto, Kaija Lehtonen, Lasse JMIR Med Inform Original Paper BACKGROUND: The rapid expansion in the use of electronic health records (EHR) has increased the number of medical errors originating in health information systems (HIS). The sociotechnical approach helps in understanding risks in the development, implementation, and use of EHR and health information technology (HIT) while accounting for complex interactions of technology within the health care system. OBJECTIVE: This study addresses two important questions: (1) “which of the common EHR error types are associated with perceived high- and extreme-risk severity ratings among EHR users?”, and (2) “which variables are associated with high- and extreme-risk severity ratings?” METHODS: This study was a quantitative, non-experimental, descriptive study of EHR users. We conducted a cross-sectional web-based questionnaire study at the largest hospital district in Finland. Statistical tests included the reliability of the summative scales tested with Cronbach’s alpha. Logistic regression served to assess the association of the independent variables to each of the eight risk factors examined. RESULTS: A total of 2864 eligible respondents provided the final data. Almost half of the respondents reported a high level of risk related to the error type “extended EHR unavailability”. The lowest overall risk level was associated with “selecting incorrectly from a list of items”. In multivariate analyses, profession and clinical unit proved to be the strongest predictors for high perceived risk. Physicians perceived risk levels to be the highest (P<.001 in six of eight error types), while emergency departments, operating rooms, and procedure units were associated with higher perceived risk levels (P<.001 in four of eight error types). Previous participation in eLearning courses on EHR-use was associated with lower risk for some of the risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a large number of Finnish EHR users in hospitals, this study indicates that HIT safety hazards should be taken very seriously, particularly in operating rooms, procedure units, emergency departments, and intensive care units/critical care units. Health care organizations should use proactive and systematic assessments of EHR risks before harmful events occur. An EHR training program should be compulsory for all EHR users in order to address EHR safety concerns resulting from the failure to use HIT appropriately. Gunther Eysenbach 2016-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4890731/ /pubmed/27154599 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/medinform.5238 Text en ©Sari Palojoki, Tuuli Pajunen, Kaija Saranto, Lasse Lehtonen. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (http://medinform.jmir.org), 06.05.2016. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Medical Informatics, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://medinform.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Palojoki, Sari
Pajunen, Tuuli
Saranto, Kaija
Lehtonen, Lasse
Electronic Health Record-Related Safety Concerns: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Electronic Health Record Users
title Electronic Health Record-Related Safety Concerns: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Electronic Health Record Users
title_full Electronic Health Record-Related Safety Concerns: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Electronic Health Record Users
title_fullStr Electronic Health Record-Related Safety Concerns: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Electronic Health Record Users
title_full_unstemmed Electronic Health Record-Related Safety Concerns: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Electronic Health Record Users
title_short Electronic Health Record-Related Safety Concerns: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Electronic Health Record Users
title_sort electronic health record-related safety concerns: a cross-sectional survey of electronic health record users
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4890731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27154599
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/medinform.5238
work_keys_str_mv AT palojokisari electronichealthrecordrelatedsafetyconcernsacrosssectionalsurveyofelectronichealthrecordusers
AT pajunentuuli electronichealthrecordrelatedsafetyconcernsacrosssectionalsurveyofelectronichealthrecordusers
AT sarantokaija electronichealthrecordrelatedsafetyconcernsacrosssectionalsurveyofelectronichealthrecordusers
AT lehtonenlasse electronichealthrecordrelatedsafetyconcernsacrosssectionalsurveyofelectronichealthrecordusers