Cargando…

Preoperative Evaluation of Renal Cell Carcinoma by Using 18F-FDG PET/CT

PURPOSE: This study aimed to characterize the FDG uptake of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) by the pathological subtype and nuclear grade. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients who underwent (18)F-FDG PET and subsequent partial or radical nephrectomy for renal tumors. The relations...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takahashi, Miwako, Kume, Haruki, Koyama, Keitaro, Nakagawa, Tohru, Fujimura, Tetsuya, Morikawa, Teppei, Fukayama, Masashi, Homma, Yukio, Ohtomo, Kuni, Momose, Toshimitsu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4890815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26164183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000000875
_version_ 1782435161630048256
author Takahashi, Miwako
Kume, Haruki
Koyama, Keitaro
Nakagawa, Tohru
Fujimura, Tetsuya
Morikawa, Teppei
Fukayama, Masashi
Homma, Yukio
Ohtomo, Kuni
Momose, Toshimitsu
author_facet Takahashi, Miwako
Kume, Haruki
Koyama, Keitaro
Nakagawa, Tohru
Fujimura, Tetsuya
Morikawa, Teppei
Fukayama, Masashi
Homma, Yukio
Ohtomo, Kuni
Momose, Toshimitsu
author_sort Takahashi, Miwako
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to characterize the FDG uptake of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) by the pathological subtype and nuclear grade. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients who underwent (18)F-FDG PET and subsequent partial or radical nephrectomy for renal tumors. The relationships of the SUV of renal tumor with subtypes, nuclear grade, and clinicopathological variables were investigated. RESULTS: Ninety-two tumors were analyzed, including 52 low-grade (G1 and G2) and 18 high-grade (G3 and G4) clear cell RCC; 7 chromophobe, 5 papillary, and 1 unclassified RCC; and 9 benign tumors (7 angiomyolipoma and 2 oncocytoma). The SUVs of high-grade clear cell RCC (mean ± SD, 6.8 ± 5.1) and papillary RCC (6.6 ± 3.7) were significantly higher than that of the controls (2.2 ± 0.3). The SUV of high-grade clear cell RCC was higher than that of low-grade tumors (median, 4.0 vs. 2.2; P < 0.001). The optimal SUV cutoff value of 3.0 helped to differentiate high-grade from low-grade clear cell RCC, with 89% sensitivity and 87% specificity. On multiple regression analysis, a high grade was the most significant predictor of SUV for clear cell RCC. CONCLUSIONS: FDG uptake higher than that observed in normal kidney tissues suggests a high-grade clear cell RCC or papillary RCC subtype. FDG-PET using SUV may have a role in prediction of pathological grade of renal tumor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4890815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48908152016-06-21 Preoperative Evaluation of Renal Cell Carcinoma by Using 18F-FDG PET/CT Takahashi, Miwako Kume, Haruki Koyama, Keitaro Nakagawa, Tohru Fujimura, Tetsuya Morikawa, Teppei Fukayama, Masashi Homma, Yukio Ohtomo, Kuni Momose, Toshimitsu Clin Nucl Med Original Articles PURPOSE: This study aimed to characterize the FDG uptake of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) by the pathological subtype and nuclear grade. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients who underwent (18)F-FDG PET and subsequent partial or radical nephrectomy for renal tumors. The relationships of the SUV of renal tumor with subtypes, nuclear grade, and clinicopathological variables were investigated. RESULTS: Ninety-two tumors were analyzed, including 52 low-grade (G1 and G2) and 18 high-grade (G3 and G4) clear cell RCC; 7 chromophobe, 5 papillary, and 1 unclassified RCC; and 9 benign tumors (7 angiomyolipoma and 2 oncocytoma). The SUVs of high-grade clear cell RCC (mean ± SD, 6.8 ± 5.1) and papillary RCC (6.6 ± 3.7) were significantly higher than that of the controls (2.2 ± 0.3). The SUV of high-grade clear cell RCC was higher than that of low-grade tumors (median, 4.0 vs. 2.2; P < 0.001). The optimal SUV cutoff value of 3.0 helped to differentiate high-grade from low-grade clear cell RCC, with 89% sensitivity and 87% specificity. On multiple regression analysis, a high grade was the most significant predictor of SUV for clear cell RCC. CONCLUSIONS: FDG uptake higher than that observed in normal kidney tissues suggests a high-grade clear cell RCC or papillary RCC subtype. FDG-PET using SUV may have a role in prediction of pathological grade of renal tumor. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015-12 2015-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4890815/ /pubmed/26164183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000000875 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Takahashi, Miwako
Kume, Haruki
Koyama, Keitaro
Nakagawa, Tohru
Fujimura, Tetsuya
Morikawa, Teppei
Fukayama, Masashi
Homma, Yukio
Ohtomo, Kuni
Momose, Toshimitsu
Preoperative Evaluation of Renal Cell Carcinoma by Using 18F-FDG PET/CT
title Preoperative Evaluation of Renal Cell Carcinoma by Using 18F-FDG PET/CT
title_full Preoperative Evaluation of Renal Cell Carcinoma by Using 18F-FDG PET/CT
title_fullStr Preoperative Evaluation of Renal Cell Carcinoma by Using 18F-FDG PET/CT
title_full_unstemmed Preoperative Evaluation of Renal Cell Carcinoma by Using 18F-FDG PET/CT
title_short Preoperative Evaluation of Renal Cell Carcinoma by Using 18F-FDG PET/CT
title_sort preoperative evaluation of renal cell carcinoma by using 18f-fdg pet/ct
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4890815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26164183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000000875
work_keys_str_mv AT takahashimiwako preoperativeevaluationofrenalcellcarcinomabyusing18ffdgpetct
AT kumeharuki preoperativeevaluationofrenalcellcarcinomabyusing18ffdgpetct
AT koyamakeitaro preoperativeevaluationofrenalcellcarcinomabyusing18ffdgpetct
AT nakagawatohru preoperativeevaluationofrenalcellcarcinomabyusing18ffdgpetct
AT fujimuratetsuya preoperativeevaluationofrenalcellcarcinomabyusing18ffdgpetct
AT morikawateppei preoperativeevaluationofrenalcellcarcinomabyusing18ffdgpetct
AT fukayamamasashi preoperativeevaluationofrenalcellcarcinomabyusing18ffdgpetct
AT hommayukio preoperativeevaluationofrenalcellcarcinomabyusing18ffdgpetct
AT ohtomokuni preoperativeevaluationofrenalcellcarcinomabyusing18ffdgpetct
AT momosetoshimitsu preoperativeevaluationofrenalcellcarcinomabyusing18ffdgpetct