Cargando…
Objective Clinical Assessment of Posture Patterns after Implant Breast Augmentation
BACKGROUND: An increased weight of the breasts causes several spinal postural alterations that reduce the ability to perform dynamic tasks requiring a stable balance. The effects of the increased weight of the breasts on static posture after implant breast augmentation have not been investigated yet...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4890832/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26218390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001454 |
_version_ | 1782435165271752704 |
---|---|
author | Nicoletti, Giovanni Mandrini, Silvia Finotti, Valentina Dall’Angelo, Anna Malovini, Alberto Chierico, Simona Faga, Angela Dalla Toffola, Elena |
author_facet | Nicoletti, Giovanni Mandrini, Silvia Finotti, Valentina Dall’Angelo, Anna Malovini, Alberto Chierico, Simona Faga, Angela Dalla Toffola, Elena |
author_sort | Nicoletti, Giovanni |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: An increased weight of the breasts causes several spinal postural alterations that reduce the ability to perform dynamic tasks requiring a stable balance. The effects of the increased weight of the breasts on static posture after implant breast augmentation have not been investigated yet. METHODS: Forty volunteer healthy women were asked to wear different sized breast implants (800, 400, and 300 g) inside a dedicated sports bra for 6½ consecutive hours during their everyday life activities, 1 day for every implant size. Posture changes were assessed with the association of a physiatric clinical examination with a static force platform analysis. RESULTS: A significant increase in cervical lordosis after the use of 400-g breast implants and upward was demonstrated. This alteration was stable between the 400-g and 800-g breast implants. The 400-g (per breast) implant might therefore be the load threshold that breaks the cervical postural physiologic balance. A significant increase in lumbar lordosis was demonstrated only after the use of the 800-g breast implants. The static force platform assessment demonstrated a worsening of the balance independent from the visual control with the use of 400-g and 800-g implants. CONCLUSIONS: Heavy breast implants proved to induce reversible alterations in the spinal curve, and 400 g is the cutoff for functional physiologic compensation in the short term. Such a weight might be considered the safety limit for the use of breast implants for cosmetic purposes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4890832 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48908322016-06-21 Objective Clinical Assessment of Posture Patterns after Implant Breast Augmentation Nicoletti, Giovanni Mandrini, Silvia Finotti, Valentina Dall’Angelo, Anna Malovini, Alberto Chierico, Simona Faga, Angela Dalla Toffola, Elena Plast Reconstr Surg Cosmetic: Original Articles BACKGROUND: An increased weight of the breasts causes several spinal postural alterations that reduce the ability to perform dynamic tasks requiring a stable balance. The effects of the increased weight of the breasts on static posture after implant breast augmentation have not been investigated yet. METHODS: Forty volunteer healthy women were asked to wear different sized breast implants (800, 400, and 300 g) inside a dedicated sports bra for 6½ consecutive hours during their everyday life activities, 1 day for every implant size. Posture changes were assessed with the association of a physiatric clinical examination with a static force platform analysis. RESULTS: A significant increase in cervical lordosis after the use of 400-g breast implants and upward was demonstrated. This alteration was stable between the 400-g and 800-g breast implants. The 400-g (per breast) implant might therefore be the load threshold that breaks the cervical postural physiologic balance. A significant increase in lumbar lordosis was demonstrated only after the use of the 800-g breast implants. The static force platform assessment demonstrated a worsening of the balance independent from the visual control with the use of 400-g and 800-g implants. CONCLUSIONS: Heavy breast implants proved to induce reversible alterations in the spinal curve, and 400 g is the cutoff for functional physiologic compensation in the short term. Such a weight might be considered the safety limit for the use of breast implants for cosmetic purposes. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015-08 2015-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4890832/ /pubmed/26218390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001454 Text en Copyright © 2015 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. |
spellingShingle | Cosmetic: Original Articles Nicoletti, Giovanni Mandrini, Silvia Finotti, Valentina Dall’Angelo, Anna Malovini, Alberto Chierico, Simona Faga, Angela Dalla Toffola, Elena Objective Clinical Assessment of Posture Patterns after Implant Breast Augmentation |
title | Objective Clinical Assessment of Posture Patterns after Implant Breast Augmentation |
title_full | Objective Clinical Assessment of Posture Patterns after Implant Breast Augmentation |
title_fullStr | Objective Clinical Assessment of Posture Patterns after Implant Breast Augmentation |
title_full_unstemmed | Objective Clinical Assessment of Posture Patterns after Implant Breast Augmentation |
title_short | Objective Clinical Assessment of Posture Patterns after Implant Breast Augmentation |
title_sort | objective clinical assessment of posture patterns after implant breast augmentation |
topic | Cosmetic: Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4890832/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26218390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001454 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nicolettigiovanni objectiveclinicalassessmentofposturepatternsafterimplantbreastaugmentation AT mandrinisilvia objectiveclinicalassessmentofposturepatternsafterimplantbreastaugmentation AT finottivalentina objectiveclinicalassessmentofposturepatternsafterimplantbreastaugmentation AT dallangeloanna objectiveclinicalassessmentofposturepatternsafterimplantbreastaugmentation AT malovinialberto objectiveclinicalassessmentofposturepatternsafterimplantbreastaugmentation AT chiericosimona objectiveclinicalassessmentofposturepatternsafterimplantbreastaugmentation AT fagaangela objectiveclinicalassessmentofposturepatternsafterimplantbreastaugmentation AT dallatoffolaelena objectiveclinicalassessmentofposturepatternsafterimplantbreastaugmentation |