Cargando…

Objective Clinical Assessment of Posture Patterns after Implant Breast Augmentation

BACKGROUND: An increased weight of the breasts causes several spinal postural alterations that reduce the ability to perform dynamic tasks requiring a stable balance. The effects of the increased weight of the breasts on static posture after implant breast augmentation have not been investigated yet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nicoletti, Giovanni, Mandrini, Silvia, Finotti, Valentina, Dall’Angelo, Anna, Malovini, Alberto, Chierico, Simona, Faga, Angela, Dalla Toffola, Elena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4890832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26218390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001454
_version_ 1782435165271752704
author Nicoletti, Giovanni
Mandrini, Silvia
Finotti, Valentina
Dall’Angelo, Anna
Malovini, Alberto
Chierico, Simona
Faga, Angela
Dalla Toffola, Elena
author_facet Nicoletti, Giovanni
Mandrini, Silvia
Finotti, Valentina
Dall’Angelo, Anna
Malovini, Alberto
Chierico, Simona
Faga, Angela
Dalla Toffola, Elena
author_sort Nicoletti, Giovanni
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An increased weight of the breasts causes several spinal postural alterations that reduce the ability to perform dynamic tasks requiring a stable balance. The effects of the increased weight of the breasts on static posture after implant breast augmentation have not been investigated yet. METHODS: Forty volunteer healthy women were asked to wear different sized breast implants (800, 400, and 300 g) inside a dedicated sports bra for 6½ consecutive hours during their everyday life activities, 1 day for every implant size. Posture changes were assessed with the association of a physiatric clinical examination with a static force platform analysis. RESULTS: A significant increase in cervical lordosis after the use of 400-g breast implants and upward was demonstrated. This alteration was stable between the 400-g and 800-g breast implants. The 400-g (per breast) implant might therefore be the load threshold that breaks the cervical postural physiologic balance. A significant increase in lumbar lordosis was demonstrated only after the use of the 800-g breast implants. The static force platform assessment demonstrated a worsening of the balance independent from the visual control with the use of 400-g and 800-g implants. CONCLUSIONS: Heavy breast implants proved to induce reversible alterations in the spinal curve, and 400 g is the cutoff for functional physiologic compensation in the short term. Such a weight might be considered the safety limit for the use of breast implants for cosmetic purposes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4890832
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48908322016-06-21 Objective Clinical Assessment of Posture Patterns after Implant Breast Augmentation Nicoletti, Giovanni Mandrini, Silvia Finotti, Valentina Dall’Angelo, Anna Malovini, Alberto Chierico, Simona Faga, Angela Dalla Toffola, Elena Plast Reconstr Surg Cosmetic: Original Articles BACKGROUND: An increased weight of the breasts causes several spinal postural alterations that reduce the ability to perform dynamic tasks requiring a stable balance. The effects of the increased weight of the breasts on static posture after implant breast augmentation have not been investigated yet. METHODS: Forty volunteer healthy women were asked to wear different sized breast implants (800, 400, and 300 g) inside a dedicated sports bra for 6½ consecutive hours during their everyday life activities, 1 day for every implant size. Posture changes were assessed with the association of a physiatric clinical examination with a static force platform analysis. RESULTS: A significant increase in cervical lordosis after the use of 400-g breast implants and upward was demonstrated. This alteration was stable between the 400-g and 800-g breast implants. The 400-g (per breast) implant might therefore be the load threshold that breaks the cervical postural physiologic balance. A significant increase in lumbar lordosis was demonstrated only after the use of the 800-g breast implants. The static force platform assessment demonstrated a worsening of the balance independent from the visual control with the use of 400-g and 800-g implants. CONCLUSIONS: Heavy breast implants proved to induce reversible alterations in the spinal curve, and 400 g is the cutoff for functional physiologic compensation in the short term. Such a weight might be considered the safety limit for the use of breast implants for cosmetic purposes. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015-08 2015-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4890832/ /pubmed/26218390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001454 Text en Copyright © 2015 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Cosmetic: Original Articles
Nicoletti, Giovanni
Mandrini, Silvia
Finotti, Valentina
Dall’Angelo, Anna
Malovini, Alberto
Chierico, Simona
Faga, Angela
Dalla Toffola, Elena
Objective Clinical Assessment of Posture Patterns after Implant Breast Augmentation
title Objective Clinical Assessment of Posture Patterns after Implant Breast Augmentation
title_full Objective Clinical Assessment of Posture Patterns after Implant Breast Augmentation
title_fullStr Objective Clinical Assessment of Posture Patterns after Implant Breast Augmentation
title_full_unstemmed Objective Clinical Assessment of Posture Patterns after Implant Breast Augmentation
title_short Objective Clinical Assessment of Posture Patterns after Implant Breast Augmentation
title_sort objective clinical assessment of posture patterns after implant breast augmentation
topic Cosmetic: Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4890832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26218390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001454
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolettigiovanni objectiveclinicalassessmentofposturepatternsafterimplantbreastaugmentation
AT mandrinisilvia objectiveclinicalassessmentofposturepatternsafterimplantbreastaugmentation
AT finottivalentina objectiveclinicalassessmentofposturepatternsafterimplantbreastaugmentation
AT dallangeloanna objectiveclinicalassessmentofposturepatternsafterimplantbreastaugmentation
AT malovinialberto objectiveclinicalassessmentofposturepatternsafterimplantbreastaugmentation
AT chiericosimona objectiveclinicalassessmentofposturepatternsafterimplantbreastaugmentation
AT fagaangela objectiveclinicalassessmentofposturepatternsafterimplantbreastaugmentation
AT dallatoffolaelena objectiveclinicalassessmentofposturepatternsafterimplantbreastaugmentation