Cargando…

Intention to Accept Pertussis Vaccination for Cocooning: A Qualitative Study of the Determinants

CONTEXT: Several countries have reported a resurgence of pertussis in the last decades. This puts infants (especially <6 months) at risk of severe complications, because they are too young to be fully protected by vaccination. The global pertussis initiative has proposed pertussis vaccination of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Visser, Olga, Hautvast, Jeannine L. A., van der Velden, Koos, Hulscher, Marlies E. J. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4890858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27253386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155861
_version_ 1782435170918334464
author Visser, Olga
Hautvast, Jeannine L. A.
van der Velden, Koos
Hulscher, Marlies E. J. L.
author_facet Visser, Olga
Hautvast, Jeannine L. A.
van der Velden, Koos
Hulscher, Marlies E. J. L.
author_sort Visser, Olga
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Several countries have reported a resurgence of pertussis in the last decades. This puts infants (especially <6 months) at risk of severe complications, because they are too young to be fully protected by vaccination. The global pertussis initiative has proposed pertussis vaccination of young infants’ close contacts, in order to reduce pertussis transmission and the burden of the disease on infants. Our aim is to explore the perceived determinants (barriers and facilitators) of intention to accept vaccination among the possible target groups of pertussis vaccination for cocooning. Consideration of these determinants is necessary to optimise the uptake of the vaccination. METHODS: We conducted 13 focus groups and six individual semi-structured interviews with members of possible target groups for pertussis cocooning (i.e. parents, maternity assistants, midwives, and paediatric nurses) in the Netherlands. Here, both maternal pertussis vaccination as well as pertussis cocooning has not been implemented. The topic list was based on a literature review and a barrier framework. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and two researchers performed thematic content analysis. FINDINGS: The participants’ risk perception, outcome expectations, general vaccination beliefs, moral norms, opinion of others, perceived autonomy, anticipated regret, decisional uncertainty, and perceived organisational barriers were all factors that influenced the intention to accept pertussis vaccination for cocooning. DISCUSSION: This study has identified nine perceived determinants that influence the intention to accept pertussis cocooning vaccination. We add the following determinants to the literature: perceived cost-effectiveness (as a concept of outcome expectations), justice (as a concept of moral norms), anticipated regret, and decisional uncertainty. We recommend considering these determinants in vaccination programmes for pertussis cocooning vaccination. Experience, information and trust emerged as predominant themes within these determinants. These themes require particular attention in future research on vaccination acceptance, especially with regard to their role in use and implementation in policy and practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4890858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48908582016-06-10 Intention to Accept Pertussis Vaccination for Cocooning: A Qualitative Study of the Determinants Visser, Olga Hautvast, Jeannine L. A. van der Velden, Koos Hulscher, Marlies E. J. L. PLoS One Research Article CONTEXT: Several countries have reported a resurgence of pertussis in the last decades. This puts infants (especially <6 months) at risk of severe complications, because they are too young to be fully protected by vaccination. The global pertussis initiative has proposed pertussis vaccination of young infants’ close contacts, in order to reduce pertussis transmission and the burden of the disease on infants. Our aim is to explore the perceived determinants (barriers and facilitators) of intention to accept vaccination among the possible target groups of pertussis vaccination for cocooning. Consideration of these determinants is necessary to optimise the uptake of the vaccination. METHODS: We conducted 13 focus groups and six individual semi-structured interviews with members of possible target groups for pertussis cocooning (i.e. parents, maternity assistants, midwives, and paediatric nurses) in the Netherlands. Here, both maternal pertussis vaccination as well as pertussis cocooning has not been implemented. The topic list was based on a literature review and a barrier framework. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and two researchers performed thematic content analysis. FINDINGS: The participants’ risk perception, outcome expectations, general vaccination beliefs, moral norms, opinion of others, perceived autonomy, anticipated regret, decisional uncertainty, and perceived organisational barriers were all factors that influenced the intention to accept pertussis vaccination for cocooning. DISCUSSION: This study has identified nine perceived determinants that influence the intention to accept pertussis cocooning vaccination. We add the following determinants to the literature: perceived cost-effectiveness (as a concept of outcome expectations), justice (as a concept of moral norms), anticipated regret, and decisional uncertainty. We recommend considering these determinants in vaccination programmes for pertussis cocooning vaccination. Experience, information and trust emerged as predominant themes within these determinants. These themes require particular attention in future research on vaccination acceptance, especially with regard to their role in use and implementation in policy and practice. Public Library of Science 2016-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4890858/ /pubmed/27253386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155861 Text en © 2016 Visser et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Visser, Olga
Hautvast, Jeannine L. A.
van der Velden, Koos
Hulscher, Marlies E. J. L.
Intention to Accept Pertussis Vaccination for Cocooning: A Qualitative Study of the Determinants
title Intention to Accept Pertussis Vaccination for Cocooning: A Qualitative Study of the Determinants
title_full Intention to Accept Pertussis Vaccination for Cocooning: A Qualitative Study of the Determinants
title_fullStr Intention to Accept Pertussis Vaccination for Cocooning: A Qualitative Study of the Determinants
title_full_unstemmed Intention to Accept Pertussis Vaccination for Cocooning: A Qualitative Study of the Determinants
title_short Intention to Accept Pertussis Vaccination for Cocooning: A Qualitative Study of the Determinants
title_sort intention to accept pertussis vaccination for cocooning: a qualitative study of the determinants
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4890858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27253386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155861
work_keys_str_mv AT visserolga intentiontoacceptpertussisvaccinationforcocooningaqualitativestudyofthedeterminants
AT hautvastjeanninela intentiontoacceptpertussisvaccinationforcocooningaqualitativestudyofthedeterminants
AT vanderveldenkoos intentiontoacceptpertussisvaccinationforcocooningaqualitativestudyofthedeterminants
AT hulschermarliesejl intentiontoacceptpertussisvaccinationforcocooningaqualitativestudyofthedeterminants