Cargando…

Long-term results of a clinical trial comparing isolated vaginal stimulation with combined treatment for women with stress incontinence

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of stress urinary incontinence treatments adding pelvic floor muscle training to vaginal electrical stimulation. METHODS: Forty-eight women with stress urinary incontinence were randomized into 2 groups: 24 underwent isolated vaginal electrical stimulation, and 2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fürst, Maria Cláudia Bicudo, de Mendonça, Rafaela Rosalba, Rodrigues, Alexandre Oliveira, de Matos, Leandro Luongo, Pompeo, Antônio Carlos Lima, Bezerra, Carlos Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4891158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25003921
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082014AO2866
_version_ 1782435234833235968
author Fürst, Maria Cláudia Bicudo
de Mendonça, Rafaela Rosalba
Rodrigues, Alexandre Oliveira
de Matos, Leandro Luongo
Pompeo, Antônio Carlos Lima
Bezerra, Carlos Alberto
author_facet Fürst, Maria Cláudia Bicudo
de Mendonça, Rafaela Rosalba
Rodrigues, Alexandre Oliveira
de Matos, Leandro Luongo
Pompeo, Antônio Carlos Lima
Bezerra, Carlos Alberto
author_sort Fürst, Maria Cláudia Bicudo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of stress urinary incontinence treatments adding pelvic floor muscle training to vaginal electrical stimulation. METHODS: Forty-eight women with stress urinary incontinence were randomized into 2 groups: 24 underwent isolated vaginal electrical stimulation, and 24 vaginal electrical stimulation plus pelvic floor muscle training. History, physical examination, voiding diary, perineum strength test, and urodynamic study were assessed. Comparisons were made for adherence to treatment, muscle strength improvement, urinary symptoms, and degree of satisfaction immediately, 12 and 96 months after treatment. RESULTS: Patients' degree of satisfaction on vaginal electrical stimulation, and on vaginal electrical stimulation plus pelvic floor muscle training immediately, 12 and 96 months post treatment, were, respectively: 88.2% versus 88.9% 64.7% versus 61.1% and 42.9% versus 28.6% (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Vaginal electrical stimulation associated to pelvic floor muscle training did not show better results than vaginal electrical stimulation alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4891158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48911582016-08-10 Long-term results of a clinical trial comparing isolated vaginal stimulation with combined treatment for women with stress incontinence Fürst, Maria Cláudia Bicudo de Mendonça, Rafaela Rosalba Rodrigues, Alexandre Oliveira de Matos, Leandro Luongo Pompeo, Antônio Carlos Lima Bezerra, Carlos Alberto Einstein (Sao Paulo) Original Article OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of stress urinary incontinence treatments adding pelvic floor muscle training to vaginal electrical stimulation. METHODS: Forty-eight women with stress urinary incontinence were randomized into 2 groups: 24 underwent isolated vaginal electrical stimulation, and 24 vaginal electrical stimulation plus pelvic floor muscle training. History, physical examination, voiding diary, perineum strength test, and urodynamic study were assessed. Comparisons were made for adherence to treatment, muscle strength improvement, urinary symptoms, and degree of satisfaction immediately, 12 and 96 months after treatment. RESULTS: Patients' degree of satisfaction on vaginal electrical stimulation, and on vaginal electrical stimulation plus pelvic floor muscle training immediately, 12 and 96 months post treatment, were, respectively: 88.2% versus 88.9% 64.7% versus 61.1% and 42.9% versus 28.6% (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Vaginal electrical stimulation associated to pelvic floor muscle training did not show better results than vaginal electrical stimulation alone. Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4891158/ /pubmed/25003921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082014AO2866 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Fürst, Maria Cláudia Bicudo
de Mendonça, Rafaela Rosalba
Rodrigues, Alexandre Oliveira
de Matos, Leandro Luongo
Pompeo, Antônio Carlos Lima
Bezerra, Carlos Alberto
Long-term results of a clinical trial comparing isolated vaginal stimulation with combined treatment for women with stress incontinence
title Long-term results of a clinical trial comparing isolated vaginal stimulation with combined treatment for women with stress incontinence
title_full Long-term results of a clinical trial comparing isolated vaginal stimulation with combined treatment for women with stress incontinence
title_fullStr Long-term results of a clinical trial comparing isolated vaginal stimulation with combined treatment for women with stress incontinence
title_full_unstemmed Long-term results of a clinical trial comparing isolated vaginal stimulation with combined treatment for women with stress incontinence
title_short Long-term results of a clinical trial comparing isolated vaginal stimulation with combined treatment for women with stress incontinence
title_sort long-term results of a clinical trial comparing isolated vaginal stimulation with combined treatment for women with stress incontinence
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4891158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25003921
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082014AO2866
work_keys_str_mv AT furstmariaclaudiabicudo longtermresultsofaclinicaltrialcomparingisolatedvaginalstimulationwithcombinedtreatmentforwomenwithstressincontinence
AT demendoncarafaelarosalba longtermresultsofaclinicaltrialcomparingisolatedvaginalstimulationwithcombinedtreatmentforwomenwithstressincontinence
AT rodriguesalexandreoliveira longtermresultsofaclinicaltrialcomparingisolatedvaginalstimulationwithcombinedtreatmentforwomenwithstressincontinence
AT dematosleandroluongo longtermresultsofaclinicaltrialcomparingisolatedvaginalstimulationwithcombinedtreatmentforwomenwithstressincontinence
AT pompeoantoniocarloslima longtermresultsofaclinicaltrialcomparingisolatedvaginalstimulationwithcombinedtreatmentforwomenwithstressincontinence
AT bezerracarlosalberto longtermresultsofaclinicaltrialcomparingisolatedvaginalstimulationwithcombinedtreatmentforwomenwithstressincontinence