Cargando…

Reliability analysis of radiographic methods for determination of posterolateral lumbossacral fusion

OBJECTIVE: To analyze intra and interobserver agreement of two radiographic methods for evaluation of posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis. METHODS: Twenty patients undergoing instrumented posterolateral fusion were evaluated by anteroposterior and dynamic lateral radiographs in maximal flexion and ext...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gotfryd, Alberto Ofenhejm, de Moraes Pomar, Felipe, Carneiro, Nicola Jorge, Franzin, Fernando José, Rodrigues, Luciano Miller Reis, Poletto, Patricia Rios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4891163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25003926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082014AO2964
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To analyze intra and interobserver agreement of two radiographic methods for evaluation of posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis. METHODS: Twenty patients undergoing instrumented posterolateral fusion were evaluated by anteroposterior and dynamic lateral radiographs in maximal flexion and extension. The images were evaluated initially by 6 orthopedic surgeons, and after 8 weeks, reassessed by 4 of them, totaling 400 radiographic measurements. Intra and interobserver reliability were analyzed using the Kappa coefficient and Landis and Koch criteria. RESULTS: Intra and interobserver agreement regarding anteroposterior radiographs were, respectively, 76 and 63%. On lateral views, these values were 78 and 84%, respectively. However, the Kappa analysis showed poor intra and interobserver agreement in most cases, regardless of the radiographic method used. CONCLUSION: There was poor intra and interobserver agreement in the evaluation of lumbosacral fusion by plain film in anteroposterior and dynamic lateral views, with no statistical superiority between the methods.