Cargando…
Antipredator behaviours of a spider mite in response to cues of dangerous and harmless predators
Prey are known to invest in costly antipredator behaviour when perceiving cues of dangerous, but not of relatively harmless predators. Whereas most studies investigate one type of antipredator behaviour, we studied several types (changes in oviposition, in escape and avoidance behaviour) in the spid...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4891363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27067101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10493-016-0042-5 |
_version_ | 1782435255147298816 |
---|---|
author | Dias, Cleide Rosa Bernardo, Ana Maria Guimarães Mencalha, Jussara Freitas, Caelum Woods Carvalho Sarmento, Renato Almeida Pallini, Angelo Janssen, Arne |
author_facet | Dias, Cleide Rosa Bernardo, Ana Maria Guimarães Mencalha, Jussara Freitas, Caelum Woods Carvalho Sarmento, Renato Almeida Pallini, Angelo Janssen, Arne |
author_sort | Dias, Cleide Rosa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prey are known to invest in costly antipredator behaviour when perceiving cues of dangerous, but not of relatively harmless predators. Whereas most studies investigate one type of antipredator behaviour, we studied several types (changes in oviposition, in escape and avoidance behaviour) in the spider mite Tetranychus evansi in response to cues from two predatory mites. The predator Phytoseiulus longipes is considered a dangerous predator for T. evansi, whereas Phytoseiulus macropilis has a low predation rate on this prey, thus is a much less dangerous predator. Spider mite females oviposited less on leaf disc halves with predator cues than on clean disc halves, independent of the predator species. On entire leaf discs, they laid fewer eggs in the presence of cues of the dangerous predator than on clean discs, but not in the presence of cues of the harmless predator. Furthermore, the spider mites escaped more often from discs with cues of the dangerous predator than from discs without predator cues, but they did not escape more from discs with cues of the harmless predator. The spider mites did not avoid plants with conspecifics and predators. We conclude that the spider mites displayed several different antipredator responses to the same predator species, and that some of these antipredator responses were stronger with cues of dangerous predators than with cues of harmless predators. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4891363 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48913632016-06-17 Antipredator behaviours of a spider mite in response to cues of dangerous and harmless predators Dias, Cleide Rosa Bernardo, Ana Maria Guimarães Mencalha, Jussara Freitas, Caelum Woods Carvalho Sarmento, Renato Almeida Pallini, Angelo Janssen, Arne Exp Appl Acarol Article Prey are known to invest in costly antipredator behaviour when perceiving cues of dangerous, but not of relatively harmless predators. Whereas most studies investigate one type of antipredator behaviour, we studied several types (changes in oviposition, in escape and avoidance behaviour) in the spider mite Tetranychus evansi in response to cues from two predatory mites. The predator Phytoseiulus longipes is considered a dangerous predator for T. evansi, whereas Phytoseiulus macropilis has a low predation rate on this prey, thus is a much less dangerous predator. Spider mite females oviposited less on leaf disc halves with predator cues than on clean disc halves, independent of the predator species. On entire leaf discs, they laid fewer eggs in the presence of cues of the dangerous predator than on clean discs, but not in the presence of cues of the harmless predator. Furthermore, the spider mites escaped more often from discs with cues of the dangerous predator than from discs without predator cues, but they did not escape more from discs with cues of the harmless predator. The spider mites did not avoid plants with conspecifics and predators. We conclude that the spider mites displayed several different antipredator responses to the same predator species, and that some of these antipredator responses were stronger with cues of dangerous predators than with cues of harmless predators. Springer International Publishing 2016-04-11 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4891363/ /pubmed/27067101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10493-016-0042-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Dias, Cleide Rosa Bernardo, Ana Maria Guimarães Mencalha, Jussara Freitas, Caelum Woods Carvalho Sarmento, Renato Almeida Pallini, Angelo Janssen, Arne Antipredator behaviours of a spider mite in response to cues of dangerous and harmless predators |
title | Antipredator behaviours of a spider mite in response to cues of dangerous and harmless predators |
title_full | Antipredator behaviours of a spider mite in response to cues of dangerous and harmless predators |
title_fullStr | Antipredator behaviours of a spider mite in response to cues of dangerous and harmless predators |
title_full_unstemmed | Antipredator behaviours of a spider mite in response to cues of dangerous and harmless predators |
title_short | Antipredator behaviours of a spider mite in response to cues of dangerous and harmless predators |
title_sort | antipredator behaviours of a spider mite in response to cues of dangerous and harmless predators |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4891363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27067101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10493-016-0042-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT diascleiderosa antipredatorbehavioursofaspidermiteinresponsetocuesofdangerousandharmlesspredators AT bernardoanamariaguimaraes antipredatorbehavioursofaspidermiteinresponsetocuesofdangerousandharmlesspredators AT mencalhajussara antipredatorbehavioursofaspidermiteinresponsetocuesofdangerousandharmlesspredators AT freitascaelumwoodscarvalho antipredatorbehavioursofaspidermiteinresponsetocuesofdangerousandharmlesspredators AT sarmentorenatoalmeida antipredatorbehavioursofaspidermiteinresponsetocuesofdangerousandharmlesspredators AT palliniangelo antipredatorbehavioursofaspidermiteinresponsetocuesofdangerousandharmlesspredators AT janssenarne antipredatorbehavioursofaspidermiteinresponsetocuesofdangerousandharmlesspredators |