Cargando…

Antipredator behaviours of a spider mite in response to cues of dangerous and harmless predators

Prey are known to invest in costly antipredator behaviour when perceiving cues of dangerous, but not of relatively harmless predators. Whereas most studies investigate one type of antipredator behaviour, we studied several types (changes in oviposition, in escape and avoidance behaviour) in the spid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dias, Cleide Rosa, Bernardo, Ana Maria Guimarães, Mencalha, Jussara, Freitas, Caelum Woods Carvalho, Sarmento, Renato Almeida, Pallini, Angelo, Janssen, Arne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4891363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27067101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10493-016-0042-5
_version_ 1782435255147298816
author Dias, Cleide Rosa
Bernardo, Ana Maria Guimarães
Mencalha, Jussara
Freitas, Caelum Woods Carvalho
Sarmento, Renato Almeida
Pallini, Angelo
Janssen, Arne
author_facet Dias, Cleide Rosa
Bernardo, Ana Maria Guimarães
Mencalha, Jussara
Freitas, Caelum Woods Carvalho
Sarmento, Renato Almeida
Pallini, Angelo
Janssen, Arne
author_sort Dias, Cleide Rosa
collection PubMed
description Prey are known to invest in costly antipredator behaviour when perceiving cues of dangerous, but not of relatively harmless predators. Whereas most studies investigate one type of antipredator behaviour, we studied several types (changes in oviposition, in escape and avoidance behaviour) in the spider mite Tetranychus evansi in response to cues from two predatory mites. The predator Phytoseiulus longipes is considered a dangerous predator for T. evansi, whereas Phytoseiulus macropilis has a low predation rate on this prey, thus is a much less dangerous predator. Spider mite females oviposited less on leaf disc halves with predator cues than on clean disc halves, independent of the predator species. On entire leaf discs, they laid fewer eggs in the presence of cues of the dangerous predator than on clean discs, but not in the presence of cues of the harmless predator. Furthermore, the spider mites escaped more often from discs with cues of the dangerous predator than from discs without predator cues, but they did not escape more from discs with cues of the harmless predator. The spider mites did not avoid plants with conspecifics and predators. We conclude that the spider mites displayed several different antipredator responses to the same predator species, and that some of these antipredator responses were stronger with cues of dangerous predators than with cues of harmless predators.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4891363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48913632016-06-17 Antipredator behaviours of a spider mite in response to cues of dangerous and harmless predators Dias, Cleide Rosa Bernardo, Ana Maria Guimarães Mencalha, Jussara Freitas, Caelum Woods Carvalho Sarmento, Renato Almeida Pallini, Angelo Janssen, Arne Exp Appl Acarol Article Prey are known to invest in costly antipredator behaviour when perceiving cues of dangerous, but not of relatively harmless predators. Whereas most studies investigate one type of antipredator behaviour, we studied several types (changes in oviposition, in escape and avoidance behaviour) in the spider mite Tetranychus evansi in response to cues from two predatory mites. The predator Phytoseiulus longipes is considered a dangerous predator for T. evansi, whereas Phytoseiulus macropilis has a low predation rate on this prey, thus is a much less dangerous predator. Spider mite females oviposited less on leaf disc halves with predator cues than on clean disc halves, independent of the predator species. On entire leaf discs, they laid fewer eggs in the presence of cues of the dangerous predator than on clean discs, but not in the presence of cues of the harmless predator. Furthermore, the spider mites escaped more often from discs with cues of the dangerous predator than from discs without predator cues, but they did not escape more from discs with cues of the harmless predator. The spider mites did not avoid plants with conspecifics and predators. We conclude that the spider mites displayed several different antipredator responses to the same predator species, and that some of these antipredator responses were stronger with cues of dangerous predators than with cues of harmless predators. Springer International Publishing 2016-04-11 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4891363/ /pubmed/27067101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10493-016-0042-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Dias, Cleide Rosa
Bernardo, Ana Maria Guimarães
Mencalha, Jussara
Freitas, Caelum Woods Carvalho
Sarmento, Renato Almeida
Pallini, Angelo
Janssen, Arne
Antipredator behaviours of a spider mite in response to cues of dangerous and harmless predators
title Antipredator behaviours of a spider mite in response to cues of dangerous and harmless predators
title_full Antipredator behaviours of a spider mite in response to cues of dangerous and harmless predators
title_fullStr Antipredator behaviours of a spider mite in response to cues of dangerous and harmless predators
title_full_unstemmed Antipredator behaviours of a spider mite in response to cues of dangerous and harmless predators
title_short Antipredator behaviours of a spider mite in response to cues of dangerous and harmless predators
title_sort antipredator behaviours of a spider mite in response to cues of dangerous and harmless predators
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4891363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27067101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10493-016-0042-5
work_keys_str_mv AT diascleiderosa antipredatorbehavioursofaspidermiteinresponsetocuesofdangerousandharmlesspredators
AT bernardoanamariaguimaraes antipredatorbehavioursofaspidermiteinresponsetocuesofdangerousandharmlesspredators
AT mencalhajussara antipredatorbehavioursofaspidermiteinresponsetocuesofdangerousandharmlesspredators
AT freitascaelumwoodscarvalho antipredatorbehavioursofaspidermiteinresponsetocuesofdangerousandharmlesspredators
AT sarmentorenatoalmeida antipredatorbehavioursofaspidermiteinresponsetocuesofdangerousandharmlesspredators
AT palliniangelo antipredatorbehavioursofaspidermiteinresponsetocuesofdangerousandharmlesspredators
AT janssenarne antipredatorbehavioursofaspidermiteinresponsetocuesofdangerousandharmlesspredators