Cargando…
A comparison of phase imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the imaging of multiple sclerosis lesions at ultrahigh field
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the use of high-resolution phase and QSM images acquired at ultra-high field in the investigation of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions with peripheral rings, and to discuss their usefulness for drawing inferences about underlying tissue composition. MATE...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4891374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27112155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10334-016-0560-5 |
_version_ | 1782435257652346880 |
---|---|
author | Cronin, Matthew John Wharton, Samuel Al-Radaideh, Ali Constantinescu, Cris Evangelou, Nikos Bowtell, Richard Gowland, Penny Anne |
author_facet | Cronin, Matthew John Wharton, Samuel Al-Radaideh, Ali Constantinescu, Cris Evangelou, Nikos Bowtell, Richard Gowland, Penny Anne |
author_sort | Cronin, Matthew John |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the use of high-resolution phase and QSM images acquired at ultra-high field in the investigation of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions with peripheral rings, and to discuss their usefulness for drawing inferences about underlying tissue composition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine Subjects were scanned at 7 T, using 3D T(2)*-weighted and T(1)-weighted sequences. Phase images were then unwrapped and filtered, and quantitative susceptibility maps were generated using a thresholded k-space division method. Lesions were compared visually and using a 1D profiling algorithm. RESULTS: Lesions displaying peripheral rings in the phase images were identified in 10 of the 39 subjects. Dipolar projections were apparent in the phase images outside of the extent of several of these lesions; however, QSM images showed peripheral rings without such projections. These projections appeared ring-like in a small number of phase images where no ring was observed in QSM. 1D profiles of six well-isolated example lesions showed that QSM contrast corresponds more closely to the magnitude images than phase contrast. CONCLUSIONS: Phase images contain dipolar projections, which confounds their use in the investigation of tissue composition in MS lesions. Quantitative susceptibility maps correct these projections, providing insight into the composition of MS lesions showing peripheral rings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4891374 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48913742016-06-17 A comparison of phase imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the imaging of multiple sclerosis lesions at ultrahigh field Cronin, Matthew John Wharton, Samuel Al-Radaideh, Ali Constantinescu, Cris Evangelou, Nikos Bowtell, Richard Gowland, Penny Anne MAGMA Research Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the use of high-resolution phase and QSM images acquired at ultra-high field in the investigation of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions with peripheral rings, and to discuss their usefulness for drawing inferences about underlying tissue composition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine Subjects were scanned at 7 T, using 3D T(2)*-weighted and T(1)-weighted sequences. Phase images were then unwrapped and filtered, and quantitative susceptibility maps were generated using a thresholded k-space division method. Lesions were compared visually and using a 1D profiling algorithm. RESULTS: Lesions displaying peripheral rings in the phase images were identified in 10 of the 39 subjects. Dipolar projections were apparent in the phase images outside of the extent of several of these lesions; however, QSM images showed peripheral rings without such projections. These projections appeared ring-like in a small number of phase images where no ring was observed in QSM. 1D profiles of six well-isolated example lesions showed that QSM contrast corresponds more closely to the magnitude images than phase contrast. CONCLUSIONS: Phase images contain dipolar projections, which confounds their use in the investigation of tissue composition in MS lesions. Quantitative susceptibility maps correct these projections, providing insight into the composition of MS lesions showing peripheral rings. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-04-25 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4891374/ /pubmed/27112155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10334-016-0560-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cronin, Matthew John Wharton, Samuel Al-Radaideh, Ali Constantinescu, Cris Evangelou, Nikos Bowtell, Richard Gowland, Penny Anne A comparison of phase imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the imaging of multiple sclerosis lesions at ultrahigh field |
title | A comparison of phase imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the imaging of multiple sclerosis lesions at ultrahigh field |
title_full | A comparison of phase imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the imaging of multiple sclerosis lesions at ultrahigh field |
title_fullStr | A comparison of phase imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the imaging of multiple sclerosis lesions at ultrahigh field |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of phase imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the imaging of multiple sclerosis lesions at ultrahigh field |
title_short | A comparison of phase imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the imaging of multiple sclerosis lesions at ultrahigh field |
title_sort | comparison of phase imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the imaging of multiple sclerosis lesions at ultrahigh field |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4891374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27112155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10334-016-0560-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT croninmatthewjohn acomparisonofphaseimagingandquantitativesusceptibilitymappingintheimagingofmultiplesclerosislesionsatultrahighfield AT whartonsamuel acomparisonofphaseimagingandquantitativesusceptibilitymappingintheimagingofmultiplesclerosislesionsatultrahighfield AT alradaidehali acomparisonofphaseimagingandquantitativesusceptibilitymappingintheimagingofmultiplesclerosislesionsatultrahighfield AT constantinescucris acomparisonofphaseimagingandquantitativesusceptibilitymappingintheimagingofmultiplesclerosislesionsatultrahighfield AT evangelounikos acomparisonofphaseimagingandquantitativesusceptibilitymappingintheimagingofmultiplesclerosislesionsatultrahighfield AT bowtellrichard acomparisonofphaseimagingandquantitativesusceptibilitymappingintheimagingofmultiplesclerosislesionsatultrahighfield AT gowlandpennyanne acomparisonofphaseimagingandquantitativesusceptibilitymappingintheimagingofmultiplesclerosislesionsatultrahighfield AT croninmatthewjohn comparisonofphaseimagingandquantitativesusceptibilitymappingintheimagingofmultiplesclerosislesionsatultrahighfield AT whartonsamuel comparisonofphaseimagingandquantitativesusceptibilitymappingintheimagingofmultiplesclerosislesionsatultrahighfield AT alradaidehali comparisonofphaseimagingandquantitativesusceptibilitymappingintheimagingofmultiplesclerosislesionsatultrahighfield AT constantinescucris comparisonofphaseimagingandquantitativesusceptibilitymappingintheimagingofmultiplesclerosislesionsatultrahighfield AT evangelounikos comparisonofphaseimagingandquantitativesusceptibilitymappingintheimagingofmultiplesclerosislesionsatultrahighfield AT bowtellrichard comparisonofphaseimagingandquantitativesusceptibilitymappingintheimagingofmultiplesclerosislesionsatultrahighfield AT gowlandpennyanne comparisonofphaseimagingandquantitativesusceptibilitymappingintheimagingofmultiplesclerosislesionsatultrahighfield |