Cargando…

A comparison of phase imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the imaging of multiple sclerosis lesions at ultrahigh field

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the use of high-resolution phase and QSM images acquired at ultra-high field in the investigation of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions with peripheral rings, and to discuss their usefulness for drawing inferences about underlying tissue composition. MATE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cronin, Matthew John, Wharton, Samuel, Al-Radaideh, Ali, Constantinescu, Cris, Evangelou, Nikos, Bowtell, Richard, Gowland, Penny Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4891374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27112155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10334-016-0560-5
_version_ 1782435257652346880
author Cronin, Matthew John
Wharton, Samuel
Al-Radaideh, Ali
Constantinescu, Cris
Evangelou, Nikos
Bowtell, Richard
Gowland, Penny Anne
author_facet Cronin, Matthew John
Wharton, Samuel
Al-Radaideh, Ali
Constantinescu, Cris
Evangelou, Nikos
Bowtell, Richard
Gowland, Penny Anne
author_sort Cronin, Matthew John
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the use of high-resolution phase and QSM images acquired at ultra-high field in the investigation of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions with peripheral rings, and to discuss their usefulness for drawing inferences about underlying tissue composition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine Subjects were scanned at 7 T, using 3D T(2)*-weighted and T(1)-weighted sequences. Phase images were then unwrapped and filtered, and quantitative susceptibility maps were generated using a thresholded k-space division method. Lesions were compared visually and using a 1D profiling algorithm. RESULTS: Lesions displaying peripheral rings in the phase images were identified in 10 of the 39 subjects. Dipolar projections were apparent in the phase images outside of the extent of several of these lesions; however, QSM images showed peripheral rings without such projections. These projections appeared ring-like in a small number of phase images where no ring was observed in QSM. 1D profiles of six well-isolated example lesions showed that QSM contrast corresponds more closely to the magnitude images than phase contrast. CONCLUSIONS: Phase images contain dipolar projections, which confounds their use in the investigation of tissue composition in MS lesions. Quantitative susceptibility maps correct these projections, providing insight into the composition of MS lesions showing peripheral rings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4891374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48913742016-06-17 A comparison of phase imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the imaging of multiple sclerosis lesions at ultrahigh field Cronin, Matthew John Wharton, Samuel Al-Radaideh, Ali Constantinescu, Cris Evangelou, Nikos Bowtell, Richard Gowland, Penny Anne MAGMA Research Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the use of high-resolution phase and QSM images acquired at ultra-high field in the investigation of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions with peripheral rings, and to discuss their usefulness for drawing inferences about underlying tissue composition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine Subjects were scanned at 7 T, using 3D T(2)*-weighted and T(1)-weighted sequences. Phase images were then unwrapped and filtered, and quantitative susceptibility maps were generated using a thresholded k-space division method. Lesions were compared visually and using a 1D profiling algorithm. RESULTS: Lesions displaying peripheral rings in the phase images were identified in 10 of the 39 subjects. Dipolar projections were apparent in the phase images outside of the extent of several of these lesions; however, QSM images showed peripheral rings without such projections. These projections appeared ring-like in a small number of phase images where no ring was observed in QSM. 1D profiles of six well-isolated example lesions showed that QSM contrast corresponds more closely to the magnitude images than phase contrast. CONCLUSIONS: Phase images contain dipolar projections, which confounds their use in the investigation of tissue composition in MS lesions. Quantitative susceptibility maps correct these projections, providing insight into the composition of MS lesions showing peripheral rings. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-04-25 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4891374/ /pubmed/27112155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10334-016-0560-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cronin, Matthew John
Wharton, Samuel
Al-Radaideh, Ali
Constantinescu, Cris
Evangelou, Nikos
Bowtell, Richard
Gowland, Penny Anne
A comparison of phase imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the imaging of multiple sclerosis lesions at ultrahigh field
title A comparison of phase imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the imaging of multiple sclerosis lesions at ultrahigh field
title_full A comparison of phase imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the imaging of multiple sclerosis lesions at ultrahigh field
title_fullStr A comparison of phase imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the imaging of multiple sclerosis lesions at ultrahigh field
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of phase imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the imaging of multiple sclerosis lesions at ultrahigh field
title_short A comparison of phase imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the imaging of multiple sclerosis lesions at ultrahigh field
title_sort comparison of phase imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the imaging of multiple sclerosis lesions at ultrahigh field
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4891374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27112155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10334-016-0560-5
work_keys_str_mv AT croninmatthewjohn acomparisonofphaseimagingandquantitativesusceptibilitymappingintheimagingofmultiplesclerosislesionsatultrahighfield
AT whartonsamuel acomparisonofphaseimagingandquantitativesusceptibilitymappingintheimagingofmultiplesclerosislesionsatultrahighfield
AT alradaidehali acomparisonofphaseimagingandquantitativesusceptibilitymappingintheimagingofmultiplesclerosislesionsatultrahighfield
AT constantinescucris acomparisonofphaseimagingandquantitativesusceptibilitymappingintheimagingofmultiplesclerosislesionsatultrahighfield
AT evangelounikos acomparisonofphaseimagingandquantitativesusceptibilitymappingintheimagingofmultiplesclerosislesionsatultrahighfield
AT bowtellrichard acomparisonofphaseimagingandquantitativesusceptibilitymappingintheimagingofmultiplesclerosislesionsatultrahighfield
AT gowlandpennyanne acomparisonofphaseimagingandquantitativesusceptibilitymappingintheimagingofmultiplesclerosislesionsatultrahighfield
AT croninmatthewjohn comparisonofphaseimagingandquantitativesusceptibilitymappingintheimagingofmultiplesclerosislesionsatultrahighfield
AT whartonsamuel comparisonofphaseimagingandquantitativesusceptibilitymappingintheimagingofmultiplesclerosislesionsatultrahighfield
AT alradaidehali comparisonofphaseimagingandquantitativesusceptibilitymappingintheimagingofmultiplesclerosislesionsatultrahighfield
AT constantinescucris comparisonofphaseimagingandquantitativesusceptibilitymappingintheimagingofmultiplesclerosislesionsatultrahighfield
AT evangelounikos comparisonofphaseimagingandquantitativesusceptibilitymappingintheimagingofmultiplesclerosislesionsatultrahighfield
AT bowtellrichard comparisonofphaseimagingandquantitativesusceptibilitymappingintheimagingofmultiplesclerosislesionsatultrahighfield
AT gowlandpennyanne comparisonofphaseimagingandquantitativesusceptibilitymappingintheimagingofmultiplesclerosislesionsatultrahighfield