Cargando…

What approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A protocol for a realist review

BACKGROUND: The use of non-drug, non-health-service interventions has been proposed as a cost-effective alternative to help those with long-term conditions manage their illness and improve their health and well-being. Interventions typically involve accessing activities run by the third sector or co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Husk, Kerryn, Blockley, Kelly, Lovell, Rebecca, Bethel, Alison, Bloomfield, Dan, Warber, Sara, Pearson, Mark, Lang, Iain, Byng, Richard, Garside, Ruth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4891904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27255362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0269-6
_version_ 1782435345692884992
author Husk, Kerryn
Blockley, Kelly
Lovell, Rebecca
Bethel, Alison
Bloomfield, Dan
Warber, Sara
Pearson, Mark
Lang, Iain
Byng, Richard
Garside, Ruth
author_facet Husk, Kerryn
Blockley, Kelly
Lovell, Rebecca
Bethel, Alison
Bloomfield, Dan
Warber, Sara
Pearson, Mark
Lang, Iain
Byng, Richard
Garside, Ruth
author_sort Husk, Kerryn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of non-drug, non-health-service interventions has been proposed as a cost-effective alternative to help those with long-term conditions manage their illness and improve their health and well-being. Interventions typically involve accessing activities run by the third sector or community agencies and may also be described as non-medical referral, community referral or social prescribing. To be effective, patients need to be “transferred” from the primary care setting into the community and to maintain their participation in activities. However, it is not currently known how and why these approaches enable which people under what circumstances to reach community services that may benefit their health and well-being. METHODS: Database searches and extensive searching of grey sources will be carried out in an attempt to find evidence associated with referral and retention in social prescribing. After initial scoping searches, two main phases of searching will be conducted: (a) will focus on the identification of programme theories to illustrate how approaches to social prescribing work for different people and in different contexts and (b) will consist of targeted searches to locate evidence to refine these candidate theories into configurations of the contexts in which populations and the main mechanisms outcomes are achieved. Inclusion criteria will initially be broad in order to develop a clear picture of the ways in which social prescriptions might operate but may iteratively become more focused in response to initially identified evidence, for example, in terms of the population group. An expert advisory group consisting of professionals working in a range of organisations involved in social prescribing will be convened to check the approaches in the review and provide real-life experience of social prescribing. Findings from the review will be disseminated to commissioners, published in a peer-reviewed journal and used to help refine an intervention model for an outdoor nature-based group intervention. DISCUSSION: This realist review will explore why mechanisms of social prescribing work, for what groups of people and their impact on enrolment, attendance and adherence to programmes. The use of realist approaches to detail the social prescribing process is novel and will offer insights into effective transfer of patients. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42016039491
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4891904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48919042016-06-04 What approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A protocol for a realist review Husk, Kerryn Blockley, Kelly Lovell, Rebecca Bethel, Alison Bloomfield, Dan Warber, Sara Pearson, Mark Lang, Iain Byng, Richard Garside, Ruth Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: The use of non-drug, non-health-service interventions has been proposed as a cost-effective alternative to help those with long-term conditions manage their illness and improve their health and well-being. Interventions typically involve accessing activities run by the third sector or community agencies and may also be described as non-medical referral, community referral or social prescribing. To be effective, patients need to be “transferred” from the primary care setting into the community and to maintain their participation in activities. However, it is not currently known how and why these approaches enable which people under what circumstances to reach community services that may benefit their health and well-being. METHODS: Database searches and extensive searching of grey sources will be carried out in an attempt to find evidence associated with referral and retention in social prescribing. After initial scoping searches, two main phases of searching will be conducted: (a) will focus on the identification of programme theories to illustrate how approaches to social prescribing work for different people and in different contexts and (b) will consist of targeted searches to locate evidence to refine these candidate theories into configurations of the contexts in which populations and the main mechanisms outcomes are achieved. Inclusion criteria will initially be broad in order to develop a clear picture of the ways in which social prescriptions might operate but may iteratively become more focused in response to initially identified evidence, for example, in terms of the population group. An expert advisory group consisting of professionals working in a range of organisations involved in social prescribing will be convened to check the approaches in the review and provide real-life experience of social prescribing. Findings from the review will be disseminated to commissioners, published in a peer-reviewed journal and used to help refine an intervention model for an outdoor nature-based group intervention. DISCUSSION: This realist review will explore why mechanisms of social prescribing work, for what groups of people and their impact on enrolment, attendance and adherence to programmes. The use of realist approaches to detail the social prescribing process is novel and will offer insights into effective transfer of patients. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42016039491 BioMed Central 2016-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4891904/ /pubmed/27255362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0269-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Husk, Kerryn
Blockley, Kelly
Lovell, Rebecca
Bethel, Alison
Bloomfield, Dan
Warber, Sara
Pearson, Mark
Lang, Iain
Byng, Richard
Garside, Ruth
What approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A protocol for a realist review
title What approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A protocol for a realist review
title_full What approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A protocol for a realist review
title_fullStr What approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A protocol for a realist review
title_full_unstemmed What approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A protocol for a realist review
title_short What approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A protocol for a realist review
title_sort what approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? a protocol for a realist review
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4891904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27255362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0269-6
work_keys_str_mv AT huskkerryn whatapproachestosocialprescribingworkforwhomandinwhatcircumstancesaprotocolforarealistreview
AT blockleykelly whatapproachestosocialprescribingworkforwhomandinwhatcircumstancesaprotocolforarealistreview
AT lovellrebecca whatapproachestosocialprescribingworkforwhomandinwhatcircumstancesaprotocolforarealistreview
AT bethelalison whatapproachestosocialprescribingworkforwhomandinwhatcircumstancesaprotocolforarealistreview
AT bloomfielddan whatapproachestosocialprescribingworkforwhomandinwhatcircumstancesaprotocolforarealistreview
AT warbersara whatapproachestosocialprescribingworkforwhomandinwhatcircumstancesaprotocolforarealistreview
AT pearsonmark whatapproachestosocialprescribingworkforwhomandinwhatcircumstancesaprotocolforarealistreview
AT langiain whatapproachestosocialprescribingworkforwhomandinwhatcircumstancesaprotocolforarealistreview
AT byngrichard whatapproachestosocialprescribingworkforwhomandinwhatcircumstancesaprotocolforarealistreview
AT garsideruth whatapproachestosocialprescribingworkforwhomandinwhatcircumstancesaprotocolforarealistreview