Cargando…
Metrological Timelines in Traceability
There is a growing requirement for an internationally accepted system of recognition of measurement capabilities and relationships within and among countries, to facilitate seamless global commerce and trade. As a result, metrologists worldwide have recently developed increased interest in the conce...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
[Gaithersburg, MD] : U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology
1998
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4891962/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28009372 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.103.005 |
_version_ | 1782435353646333952 |
---|---|
author | Ehrlich, Charles D. Rasberry, Stanley D. |
author_facet | Ehrlich, Charles D. Rasberry, Stanley D. |
author_sort | Ehrlich, Charles D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is a growing requirement for an internationally accepted system of recognition of measurement capabilities and relationships within and among countries, to facilitate seamless global commerce and trade. As a result, metrologists worldwide have recently developed increased interest in the concept and definition of traceability. Classically, traceability provides a way of relating the results of a measurement (or value of a standard) to higher level standards. Such standards are usually national or international standards, and the comparisons used to provide the traceability must have well-understood uncertainties. An additional complexity arises because all instruments and standards are subject to change, however slight, over time. This paper develops approaches for dealing with the effects of such time-dependent changes as a part of traceability statements. The use of metrological time-lines provides a means of effectively visualizing these relationships in a statement of traceability. When the rate of change in the measurement process is sufficiently small, the approach proposed here is less important. However, documented measurement assurance procedures are required at all levels so that appropriate uncertainties may be estimated with confidence. When laboratory or national boundaries are crossed in the traceability process, other factors come into play, and the original concept of traceability can become obscure. It is becoming common to hear the term “equivalence” used to describe these more complex measurement relationships. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4891962 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1998 |
publisher | [Gaithersburg, MD] : U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48919622016-12-22 Metrological Timelines in Traceability Ehrlich, Charles D. Rasberry, Stanley D. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol Article There is a growing requirement for an internationally accepted system of recognition of measurement capabilities and relationships within and among countries, to facilitate seamless global commerce and trade. As a result, metrologists worldwide have recently developed increased interest in the concept and definition of traceability. Classically, traceability provides a way of relating the results of a measurement (or value of a standard) to higher level standards. Such standards are usually national or international standards, and the comparisons used to provide the traceability must have well-understood uncertainties. An additional complexity arises because all instruments and standards are subject to change, however slight, over time. This paper develops approaches for dealing with the effects of such time-dependent changes as a part of traceability statements. The use of metrological time-lines provides a means of effectively visualizing these relationships in a statement of traceability. When the rate of change in the measurement process is sufficiently small, the approach proposed here is less important. However, documented measurement assurance procedures are required at all levels so that appropriate uncertainties may be estimated with confidence. When laboratory or national boundaries are crossed in the traceability process, other factors come into play, and the original concept of traceability can become obscure. It is becoming common to hear the term “equivalence” used to describe these more complex measurement relationships. [Gaithersburg, MD] : U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology 1998 1998-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4891962/ /pubmed/28009372 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.103.005 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ The Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology is a publication of the U.S. Government. The papers are in the public domain and are not subject to copyright in the United States. Articles from J Res may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright. |
spellingShingle | Article Ehrlich, Charles D. Rasberry, Stanley D. Metrological Timelines in Traceability |
title | Metrological Timelines in Traceability |
title_full | Metrological Timelines in Traceability |
title_fullStr | Metrological Timelines in Traceability |
title_full_unstemmed | Metrological Timelines in Traceability |
title_short | Metrological Timelines in Traceability |
title_sort | metrological timelines in traceability |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4891962/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28009372 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.103.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ehrlichcharlesd metrologicaltimelinesintraceability AT rasberrystanleyd metrologicaltimelinesintraceability |