Cargando…

Volumetric Analysis of Gingival Crevicular Fluid and Peri-Implant Sulcus Fluid in Healthy and Diseased Sites: A Cross-Sectional Split-Mouth Pilot Study

BACKGROUND: Researchers have recently drawn attention to the analysis of gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and peri-implant sulcus fluid (PISF) for the implementation of the diagnosis of periodontal and peri-implant disease. Nevertheless, the measurements of volume and biomarkers concentration can be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bevilacqua, Lorenzo, De Biasi, Matteo, Lorenzon, Maria Giulia, Frattini, Costanza, Angerame, Daniele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4892129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27335614
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601610010131
_version_ 1782435367064961024
author Bevilacqua, Lorenzo
De Biasi, Matteo
Lorenzon, Maria Giulia
Frattini, Costanza
Angerame, Daniele
author_facet Bevilacqua, Lorenzo
De Biasi, Matteo
Lorenzon, Maria Giulia
Frattini, Costanza
Angerame, Daniele
author_sort Bevilacqua, Lorenzo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Researchers have recently drawn attention to the analysis of gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and peri-implant sulcus fluid (PISF) for the implementation of the diagnosis of periodontal and peri-implant disease. Nevertheless, the measurements of volume and biomarkers concentration can be critically biased when data collected from studies with parallel group design are compared, given the technical difficulties, methodological variables, as well as the variability of crevicular fluid characteristics among different individuals. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess the GCF and PISF volumes in healthy and diseased sites belonging to the same patient. METHOD: Ten patients presenting a periodontally healthy tooth, a tooth with periodontitis, an implant with healthy peri-implant tissues and an implant with peri-implantitis were enrolled. Samples of GCF and PISF were collected from each site of interest and their volume measured with a Periotron 8000 device. Non-parametric statistical analysis was performed to test the significance of the differences in GCF and PISF volumes between i) sites of teeth and dental implants with the same condition of health or disease and ii) healthy and diseased sites of both teeth and dental implants subgroups. The correlation between probing pocket depth (PPD) and fluid production was also tested (p<0.05). RESULTS: Healthy periodontal and peri-implant tissues produced comparable amounts of fluid that was significantly lower than in diseased sites (p<0.05). In the presence of diagnosed disease, the volumes of GCF and PISF were similar, too. The correlation between PPD and fluid production was significant only in healthy sites (PPD/GCF, ρ=0.890, p<0.001; PPD/PISF, ρ=0.810; p<0.005). CONCLUSION: The periodontal and peri-implant tissues behaved similarly in terms of fluid production in condition of both health and active disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4892129
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48921292016-06-22 Volumetric Analysis of Gingival Crevicular Fluid and Peri-Implant Sulcus Fluid in Healthy and Diseased Sites: A Cross-Sectional Split-Mouth Pilot Study Bevilacqua, Lorenzo De Biasi, Matteo Lorenzon, Maria Giulia Frattini, Costanza Angerame, Daniele Open Dent J Article BACKGROUND: Researchers have recently drawn attention to the analysis of gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and peri-implant sulcus fluid (PISF) for the implementation of the diagnosis of periodontal and peri-implant disease. Nevertheless, the measurements of volume and biomarkers concentration can be critically biased when data collected from studies with parallel group design are compared, given the technical difficulties, methodological variables, as well as the variability of crevicular fluid characteristics among different individuals. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess the GCF and PISF volumes in healthy and diseased sites belonging to the same patient. METHOD: Ten patients presenting a periodontally healthy tooth, a tooth with periodontitis, an implant with healthy peri-implant tissues and an implant with peri-implantitis were enrolled. Samples of GCF and PISF were collected from each site of interest and their volume measured with a Periotron 8000 device. Non-parametric statistical analysis was performed to test the significance of the differences in GCF and PISF volumes between i) sites of teeth and dental implants with the same condition of health or disease and ii) healthy and diseased sites of both teeth and dental implants subgroups. The correlation between probing pocket depth (PPD) and fluid production was also tested (p<0.05). RESULTS: Healthy periodontal and peri-implant tissues produced comparable amounts of fluid that was significantly lower than in diseased sites (p<0.05). In the presence of diagnosed disease, the volumes of GCF and PISF were similar, too. The correlation between PPD and fluid production was significant only in healthy sites (PPD/GCF, ρ=0.890, p<0.001; PPD/PISF, ρ=0.810; p<0.005). CONCLUSION: The periodontal and peri-implant tissues behaved similarly in terms of fluid production in condition of both health and active disease. Bentham Open 2016-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4892129/ /pubmed/27335614 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601610010131 Text en Bevilacqua et al; Licensee Bentham Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode), which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Bevilacqua, Lorenzo
De Biasi, Matteo
Lorenzon, Maria Giulia
Frattini, Costanza
Angerame, Daniele
Volumetric Analysis of Gingival Crevicular Fluid and Peri-Implant Sulcus Fluid in Healthy and Diseased Sites: A Cross-Sectional Split-Mouth Pilot Study
title Volumetric Analysis of Gingival Crevicular Fluid and Peri-Implant Sulcus Fluid in Healthy and Diseased Sites: A Cross-Sectional Split-Mouth Pilot Study
title_full Volumetric Analysis of Gingival Crevicular Fluid and Peri-Implant Sulcus Fluid in Healthy and Diseased Sites: A Cross-Sectional Split-Mouth Pilot Study
title_fullStr Volumetric Analysis of Gingival Crevicular Fluid and Peri-Implant Sulcus Fluid in Healthy and Diseased Sites: A Cross-Sectional Split-Mouth Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Volumetric Analysis of Gingival Crevicular Fluid and Peri-Implant Sulcus Fluid in Healthy and Diseased Sites: A Cross-Sectional Split-Mouth Pilot Study
title_short Volumetric Analysis of Gingival Crevicular Fluid and Peri-Implant Sulcus Fluid in Healthy and Diseased Sites: A Cross-Sectional Split-Mouth Pilot Study
title_sort volumetric analysis of gingival crevicular fluid and peri-implant sulcus fluid in healthy and diseased sites: a cross-sectional split-mouth pilot study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4892129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27335614
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601610010131
work_keys_str_mv AT bevilacqualorenzo volumetricanalysisofgingivalcrevicularfluidandperiimplantsulcusfluidinhealthyanddiseasedsitesacrosssectionalsplitmouthpilotstudy
AT debiasimatteo volumetricanalysisofgingivalcrevicularfluidandperiimplantsulcusfluidinhealthyanddiseasedsitesacrosssectionalsplitmouthpilotstudy
AT lorenzonmariagiulia volumetricanalysisofgingivalcrevicularfluidandperiimplantsulcusfluidinhealthyanddiseasedsitesacrosssectionalsplitmouthpilotstudy
AT frattinicostanza volumetricanalysisofgingivalcrevicularfluidandperiimplantsulcusfluidinhealthyanddiseasedsitesacrosssectionalsplitmouthpilotstudy
AT angeramedaniele volumetricanalysisofgingivalcrevicularfluidandperiimplantsulcusfluidinhealthyanddiseasedsitesacrosssectionalsplitmouthpilotstudy