Cargando…

Microscopic Study of Surface Microtopographic Characteristics of Dental Implants

OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the micro topographic characteristics of dental implants submitted to different surface treatments, using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Implants were divided into 7 groups of 3 specimens each, according to the surface treatment used: g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sezin, M., Croharé, L., Ibañez, J.C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4892131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27335615
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601610010139
_version_ 1782435367511654400
author Sezin, M.
Croharé, L.
Ibañez, J.C.
author_facet Sezin, M.
Croharé, L.
Ibañez, J.C.
author_sort Sezin, M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the micro topographic characteristics of dental implants submitted to different surface treatments, using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Implants were divided into 7 groups of 3 specimens each, according to the surface treatment used: group 1: Osseotite, BIOMET 3i; group 2: SLA surface, Institut Straumann AG; group 3: Oxalife surface, Tree-Oss implant; group 4: B&W implant surface; group 5: Q-implant surface; group 6: ML implant surface; group 7: RBM surface, Rosterdent implant. The surfaces were examined under SEM (Carl Zeiss FE-SEM-SIGMA). Image Proplus software was used to determine the number and mean diameter of pores per area unit (mm). The data obtained were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney test. A confocal laser microscope (LEXT-OLS4100 Olympus) was used to conduct the comparative study of surface roughness (Ra). Data were analyzed using Tukey's HSD test. RESULTS: The largest average pore diameter calculated in microns was found in group 5 (3.45 µm+/-1.91) while the smallest in group 7 (1.47µm+/-1.29). Significant differences were observed among each one of the groups studied (p<0.05). The largest number of pores/mm(2) was found in group 2 (229343) and the smallest number in group 4 (10937). Group 2 showed significant differences regarding the other groups (p<0.05). The greatest roughness (Ra) was observed in group 2 (0.975µm+/-0.115) and the smallest in group 4 (0.304µm+/-0.063). Group 2 was significantly different from the other groups (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The micro topography observed in the different groups presented dissimilar and specific features, depending on the chemical treatment used for the surfaces..
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4892131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48921312016-06-22 Microscopic Study of Surface Microtopographic Characteristics of Dental Implants Sezin, M. Croharé, L. Ibañez, J.C. Open Dent J Article OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the micro topographic characteristics of dental implants submitted to different surface treatments, using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Implants were divided into 7 groups of 3 specimens each, according to the surface treatment used: group 1: Osseotite, BIOMET 3i; group 2: SLA surface, Institut Straumann AG; group 3: Oxalife surface, Tree-Oss implant; group 4: B&W implant surface; group 5: Q-implant surface; group 6: ML implant surface; group 7: RBM surface, Rosterdent implant. The surfaces were examined under SEM (Carl Zeiss FE-SEM-SIGMA). Image Proplus software was used to determine the number and mean diameter of pores per area unit (mm). The data obtained were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney test. A confocal laser microscope (LEXT-OLS4100 Olympus) was used to conduct the comparative study of surface roughness (Ra). Data were analyzed using Tukey's HSD test. RESULTS: The largest average pore diameter calculated in microns was found in group 5 (3.45 µm+/-1.91) while the smallest in group 7 (1.47µm+/-1.29). Significant differences were observed among each one of the groups studied (p<0.05). The largest number of pores/mm(2) was found in group 2 (229343) and the smallest number in group 4 (10937). Group 2 showed significant differences regarding the other groups (p<0.05). The greatest roughness (Ra) was observed in group 2 (0.975µm+/-0.115) and the smallest in group 4 (0.304µm+/-0.063). Group 2 was significantly different from the other groups (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The micro topography observed in the different groups presented dissimilar and specific features, depending on the chemical treatment used for the surfaces.. Bentham Open 2016-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4892131/ /pubmed/27335615 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601610010139 Text en © Sezin et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode), which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Sezin, M.
Croharé, L.
Ibañez, J.C.
Microscopic Study of Surface Microtopographic Characteristics of Dental Implants
title Microscopic Study of Surface Microtopographic Characteristics of Dental Implants
title_full Microscopic Study of Surface Microtopographic Characteristics of Dental Implants
title_fullStr Microscopic Study of Surface Microtopographic Characteristics of Dental Implants
title_full_unstemmed Microscopic Study of Surface Microtopographic Characteristics of Dental Implants
title_short Microscopic Study of Surface Microtopographic Characteristics of Dental Implants
title_sort microscopic study of surface microtopographic characteristics of dental implants
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4892131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27335615
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601610010139
work_keys_str_mv AT sezinm microscopicstudyofsurfacemicrotopographiccharacteristicsofdentalimplants
AT croharel microscopicstudyofsurfacemicrotopographiccharacteristicsofdentalimplants
AT ibanezjc microscopicstudyofsurfacemicrotopographiccharacteristicsofdentalimplants