Cargando…
A Comparative Study of Five Association Tests Based on CpG Set for Epigenome-Wide Association Studies
An epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) is a large-scale study of human disease-associated epigenetic variation, specifically variation in DNA methylation. High throughput technologies enable simultaneous epigenetic profiling of DNA methylation at hundreds of thousands of CpGs across the genome....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4892473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27258058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156895 |
_version_ | 1782435393579253760 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Qiuyi Zhao, Yang Zhang, Ruyang Wei, Yongyue Yi, Honggang Shao, Fang Chen, Feng |
author_facet | Zhang, Qiuyi Zhao, Yang Zhang, Ruyang Wei, Yongyue Yi, Honggang Shao, Fang Chen, Feng |
author_sort | Zhang, Qiuyi |
collection | PubMed |
description | An epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) is a large-scale study of human disease-associated epigenetic variation, specifically variation in DNA methylation. High throughput technologies enable simultaneous epigenetic profiling of DNA methylation at hundreds of thousands of CpGs across the genome. The clustering of correlated DNA methylation at CpGs is reportedly similar to that of linkage-disequilibrium (LD) correlation in genetic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) variation. However, current analysis methods, such as the t-test and rank-sum test, may be underpowered to detect differentially methylated markers. We propose to test the association between the outcome (e.g case or control) and a set of CpG sites jointly. Here, we compared the performance of five CpG set analysis approaches: principal component analysis (PCA), supervised principal component analysis (SPCA), kernel principal component analysis (KPCA), sequence kernel association test (SKAT), and sliced inverse regression (SIR) with Hotelling’s T(2) test and t-test using Bonferroni correction. The simulation results revealed that the first six methods can control the type I error at the significance level, while the t-test is conservative. SPCA and SKAT performed better than other approaches when the correlation among CpG sites was strong. For illustration, these methods were also applied to a real methylation dataset. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4892473 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48924732016-06-16 A Comparative Study of Five Association Tests Based on CpG Set for Epigenome-Wide Association Studies Zhang, Qiuyi Zhao, Yang Zhang, Ruyang Wei, Yongyue Yi, Honggang Shao, Fang Chen, Feng PLoS One Research Article An epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) is a large-scale study of human disease-associated epigenetic variation, specifically variation in DNA methylation. High throughput technologies enable simultaneous epigenetic profiling of DNA methylation at hundreds of thousands of CpGs across the genome. The clustering of correlated DNA methylation at CpGs is reportedly similar to that of linkage-disequilibrium (LD) correlation in genetic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) variation. However, current analysis methods, such as the t-test and rank-sum test, may be underpowered to detect differentially methylated markers. We propose to test the association between the outcome (e.g case or control) and a set of CpG sites jointly. Here, we compared the performance of five CpG set analysis approaches: principal component analysis (PCA), supervised principal component analysis (SPCA), kernel principal component analysis (KPCA), sequence kernel association test (SKAT), and sliced inverse regression (SIR) with Hotelling’s T(2) test and t-test using Bonferroni correction. The simulation results revealed that the first six methods can control the type I error at the significance level, while the t-test is conservative. SPCA and SKAT performed better than other approaches when the correlation among CpG sites was strong. For illustration, these methods were also applied to a real methylation dataset. Public Library of Science 2016-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4892473/ /pubmed/27258058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156895 Text en © 2016 Zhang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhang, Qiuyi Zhao, Yang Zhang, Ruyang Wei, Yongyue Yi, Honggang Shao, Fang Chen, Feng A Comparative Study of Five Association Tests Based on CpG Set for Epigenome-Wide Association Studies |
title | A Comparative Study of Five Association Tests Based on CpG Set for Epigenome-Wide Association Studies |
title_full | A Comparative Study of Five Association Tests Based on CpG Set for Epigenome-Wide Association Studies |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Study of Five Association Tests Based on CpG Set for Epigenome-Wide Association Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Study of Five Association Tests Based on CpG Set for Epigenome-Wide Association Studies |
title_short | A Comparative Study of Five Association Tests Based on CpG Set for Epigenome-Wide Association Studies |
title_sort | comparative study of five association tests based on cpg set for epigenome-wide association studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4892473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27258058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156895 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangqiuyi acomparativestudyoffiveassociationtestsbasedoncpgsetforepigenomewideassociationstudies AT zhaoyang acomparativestudyoffiveassociationtestsbasedoncpgsetforepigenomewideassociationstudies AT zhangruyang acomparativestudyoffiveassociationtestsbasedoncpgsetforepigenomewideassociationstudies AT weiyongyue acomparativestudyoffiveassociationtestsbasedoncpgsetforepigenomewideassociationstudies AT yihonggang acomparativestudyoffiveassociationtestsbasedoncpgsetforepigenomewideassociationstudies AT shaofang acomparativestudyoffiveassociationtestsbasedoncpgsetforepigenomewideassociationstudies AT chenfeng acomparativestudyoffiveassociationtestsbasedoncpgsetforepigenomewideassociationstudies AT zhangqiuyi comparativestudyoffiveassociationtestsbasedoncpgsetforepigenomewideassociationstudies AT zhaoyang comparativestudyoffiveassociationtestsbasedoncpgsetforepigenomewideassociationstudies AT zhangruyang comparativestudyoffiveassociationtestsbasedoncpgsetforepigenomewideassociationstudies AT weiyongyue comparativestudyoffiveassociationtestsbasedoncpgsetforepigenomewideassociationstudies AT yihonggang comparativestudyoffiveassociationtestsbasedoncpgsetforepigenomewideassociationstudies AT shaofang comparativestudyoffiveassociationtestsbasedoncpgsetforepigenomewideassociationstudies AT chenfeng comparativestudyoffiveassociationtestsbasedoncpgsetforepigenomewideassociationstudies |