Cargando…

Comparative Epidemiologic Characteristics of Pertussis in 10 Central and Eastern European Countries, 2000-2013

We undertook an epidemiological survey of the annual incidence of pertussis reported from 2000 to 2013 in ten Central and Eastern European countries to ascertain whether increased pertussis reports in some countries share common underlying drivers or whether there are specific features in each count...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heininger, Ulrich, André, Philippe, Chlibek, Roman, Kristufkova, Zuzana, Kutsar, Kuulo, Mangarov, Atanas, Mészner, Zsófia, Nitsch-Osuch, Aneta, Petrović, Vladimir, Prymula, Roman, Usonis, Vytautas, Zavadska, Dace
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4892528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27257822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155949
_version_ 1782435405161824256
author Heininger, Ulrich
André, Philippe
Chlibek, Roman
Kristufkova, Zuzana
Kutsar, Kuulo
Mangarov, Atanas
Mészner, Zsófia
Nitsch-Osuch, Aneta
Petrović, Vladimir
Prymula, Roman
Usonis, Vytautas
Zavadska, Dace
author_facet Heininger, Ulrich
André, Philippe
Chlibek, Roman
Kristufkova, Zuzana
Kutsar, Kuulo
Mangarov, Atanas
Mészner, Zsófia
Nitsch-Osuch, Aneta
Petrović, Vladimir
Prymula, Roman
Usonis, Vytautas
Zavadska, Dace
author_sort Heininger, Ulrich
collection PubMed
description We undertook an epidemiological survey of the annual incidence of pertussis reported from 2000 to 2013 in ten Central and Eastern European countries to ascertain whether increased pertussis reports in some countries share common underlying drivers or whether there are specific features in each country. The annual incidence of pertussis in the participating countries was obtained from relevant government institutions and/or national surveillance systems. We reviewed the changes in the pertussis incidence rates in each country to explore differences and/or similarities between countries in relation to pertussis surveillance; case definitions for detection and confirmation of pertussis; incidence and number of cases of pertussis by year, overall and by age group; population by year, overall and by age group; pertussis immunization schedule and coverage, and switch from whole-cell pertussis vaccines (wP) to acellular pertussis vaccines (aP). There was heterogeneity in the reported annual incidence rates and trends observed across countries. Reported pertussis incidence rates varied considerably, ranging from 0.01 to 96 per 100,000 population, with the highest rates generally reported in Estonia and the lowest in Hungary and Serbia. The greatest burden appears for the most part in infants (<1 year) in Bulgaria, Hungary, Latvia, Romania, and Serbia, but not in the other participating countries where the burden may have shifted to older children, though surveillance of adults may be inappropriate. There was no consistent pattern associated with the switch from wP to aP vaccines on reported pertussis incidence rates. The heterogeneity in reported data may be related to a number of factors including surveillance system characteristics or capabilities, different case definitions, type of pertussis confirmation tests used, public awareness of the disease, as well as real differences in the magnitude of the disease, or a combination of these factors. Our study highlights the need to standardize pertussis detection and confirmation in surveillance programs across Europe, complemented with carefully-designed seroprevalence studies using the same protocols and methodologies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4892528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48925282016-06-16 Comparative Epidemiologic Characteristics of Pertussis in 10 Central and Eastern European Countries, 2000-2013 Heininger, Ulrich André, Philippe Chlibek, Roman Kristufkova, Zuzana Kutsar, Kuulo Mangarov, Atanas Mészner, Zsófia Nitsch-Osuch, Aneta Petrović, Vladimir Prymula, Roman Usonis, Vytautas Zavadska, Dace PLoS One Research Article We undertook an epidemiological survey of the annual incidence of pertussis reported from 2000 to 2013 in ten Central and Eastern European countries to ascertain whether increased pertussis reports in some countries share common underlying drivers or whether there are specific features in each country. The annual incidence of pertussis in the participating countries was obtained from relevant government institutions and/or national surveillance systems. We reviewed the changes in the pertussis incidence rates in each country to explore differences and/or similarities between countries in relation to pertussis surveillance; case definitions for detection and confirmation of pertussis; incidence and number of cases of pertussis by year, overall and by age group; population by year, overall and by age group; pertussis immunization schedule and coverage, and switch from whole-cell pertussis vaccines (wP) to acellular pertussis vaccines (aP). There was heterogeneity in the reported annual incidence rates and trends observed across countries. Reported pertussis incidence rates varied considerably, ranging from 0.01 to 96 per 100,000 population, with the highest rates generally reported in Estonia and the lowest in Hungary and Serbia. The greatest burden appears for the most part in infants (<1 year) in Bulgaria, Hungary, Latvia, Romania, and Serbia, but not in the other participating countries where the burden may have shifted to older children, though surveillance of adults may be inappropriate. There was no consistent pattern associated with the switch from wP to aP vaccines on reported pertussis incidence rates. The heterogeneity in reported data may be related to a number of factors including surveillance system characteristics or capabilities, different case definitions, type of pertussis confirmation tests used, public awareness of the disease, as well as real differences in the magnitude of the disease, or a combination of these factors. Our study highlights the need to standardize pertussis detection and confirmation in surveillance programs across Europe, complemented with carefully-designed seroprevalence studies using the same protocols and methodologies. Public Library of Science 2016-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4892528/ /pubmed/27257822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155949 Text en © 2016 Heininger et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Heininger, Ulrich
André, Philippe
Chlibek, Roman
Kristufkova, Zuzana
Kutsar, Kuulo
Mangarov, Atanas
Mészner, Zsófia
Nitsch-Osuch, Aneta
Petrović, Vladimir
Prymula, Roman
Usonis, Vytautas
Zavadska, Dace
Comparative Epidemiologic Characteristics of Pertussis in 10 Central and Eastern European Countries, 2000-2013
title Comparative Epidemiologic Characteristics of Pertussis in 10 Central and Eastern European Countries, 2000-2013
title_full Comparative Epidemiologic Characteristics of Pertussis in 10 Central and Eastern European Countries, 2000-2013
title_fullStr Comparative Epidemiologic Characteristics of Pertussis in 10 Central and Eastern European Countries, 2000-2013
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Epidemiologic Characteristics of Pertussis in 10 Central and Eastern European Countries, 2000-2013
title_short Comparative Epidemiologic Characteristics of Pertussis in 10 Central and Eastern European Countries, 2000-2013
title_sort comparative epidemiologic characteristics of pertussis in 10 central and eastern european countries, 2000-2013
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4892528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27257822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155949
work_keys_str_mv AT heiningerulrich comparativeepidemiologiccharacteristicsofpertussisin10centralandeasterneuropeancountries20002013
AT andrephilippe comparativeepidemiologiccharacteristicsofpertussisin10centralandeasterneuropeancountries20002013
AT chlibekroman comparativeepidemiologiccharacteristicsofpertussisin10centralandeasterneuropeancountries20002013
AT kristufkovazuzana comparativeepidemiologiccharacteristicsofpertussisin10centralandeasterneuropeancountries20002013
AT kutsarkuulo comparativeepidemiologiccharacteristicsofpertussisin10centralandeasterneuropeancountries20002013
AT mangarovatanas comparativeepidemiologiccharacteristicsofpertussisin10centralandeasterneuropeancountries20002013
AT mesznerzsofia comparativeepidemiologiccharacteristicsofpertussisin10centralandeasterneuropeancountries20002013
AT nitschosuchaneta comparativeepidemiologiccharacteristicsofpertussisin10centralandeasterneuropeancountries20002013
AT petrovicvladimir comparativeepidemiologiccharacteristicsofpertussisin10centralandeasterneuropeancountries20002013
AT prymularoman comparativeepidemiologiccharacteristicsofpertussisin10centralandeasterneuropeancountries20002013
AT usonisvytautas comparativeepidemiologiccharacteristicsofpertussisin10centralandeasterneuropeancountries20002013
AT zavadskadace comparativeepidemiologiccharacteristicsofpertussisin10centralandeasterneuropeancountries20002013