Cargando…
Random Forests for Global and Regional Crop Yield Predictions
Accurate predictions of crop yield are critical for developing effective agricultural and food policies at the regional and global scales. We evaluated a machine-learning method, Random Forests (RF), for its ability to predict crop yield responses to climate and biophysical variables at global and r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4892571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27257967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156571 |
_version_ | 1782435414734274560 |
---|---|
author | Jeong, Jig Han Resop, Jonathan P. Mueller, Nathaniel D. Fleisher, David H. Yun, Kyungdahm Butler, Ethan E. Timlin, Dennis J. Shim, Kyo-Moon Gerber, James S. Reddy, Vangimalla R. Kim, Soo-Hyung |
author_facet | Jeong, Jig Han Resop, Jonathan P. Mueller, Nathaniel D. Fleisher, David H. Yun, Kyungdahm Butler, Ethan E. Timlin, Dennis J. Shim, Kyo-Moon Gerber, James S. Reddy, Vangimalla R. Kim, Soo-Hyung |
author_sort | Jeong, Jig Han |
collection | PubMed |
description | Accurate predictions of crop yield are critical for developing effective agricultural and food policies at the regional and global scales. We evaluated a machine-learning method, Random Forests (RF), for its ability to predict crop yield responses to climate and biophysical variables at global and regional scales in wheat, maize, and potato in comparison with multiple linear regressions (MLR) serving as a benchmark. We used crop yield data from various sources and regions for model training and testing: 1) gridded global wheat grain yield, 2) maize grain yield from US counties over thirty years, and 3) potato tuber and maize silage yield from the northeastern seaboard region. RF was found highly capable of predicting crop yields and outperformed MLR benchmarks in all performance statistics that were compared. For example, the root mean square errors (RMSE) ranged between 6 and 14% of the average observed yield with RF models in all test cases whereas these values ranged from 14% to 49% for MLR models. Our results show that RF is an effective and versatile machine-learning method for crop yield predictions at regional and global scales for its high accuracy and precision, ease of use, and utility in data analysis. RF may result in a loss of accuracy when predicting the extreme ends or responses beyond the boundaries of the training data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4892571 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48925712016-06-16 Random Forests for Global and Regional Crop Yield Predictions Jeong, Jig Han Resop, Jonathan P. Mueller, Nathaniel D. Fleisher, David H. Yun, Kyungdahm Butler, Ethan E. Timlin, Dennis J. Shim, Kyo-Moon Gerber, James S. Reddy, Vangimalla R. Kim, Soo-Hyung PLoS One Research Article Accurate predictions of crop yield are critical for developing effective agricultural and food policies at the regional and global scales. We evaluated a machine-learning method, Random Forests (RF), for its ability to predict crop yield responses to climate and biophysical variables at global and regional scales in wheat, maize, and potato in comparison with multiple linear regressions (MLR) serving as a benchmark. We used crop yield data from various sources and regions for model training and testing: 1) gridded global wheat grain yield, 2) maize grain yield from US counties over thirty years, and 3) potato tuber and maize silage yield from the northeastern seaboard region. RF was found highly capable of predicting crop yields and outperformed MLR benchmarks in all performance statistics that were compared. For example, the root mean square errors (RMSE) ranged between 6 and 14% of the average observed yield with RF models in all test cases whereas these values ranged from 14% to 49% for MLR models. Our results show that RF is an effective and versatile machine-learning method for crop yield predictions at regional and global scales for its high accuracy and precision, ease of use, and utility in data analysis. RF may result in a loss of accuracy when predicting the extreme ends or responses beyond the boundaries of the training data. Public Library of Science 2016-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4892571/ /pubmed/27257967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156571 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jeong, Jig Han Resop, Jonathan P. Mueller, Nathaniel D. Fleisher, David H. Yun, Kyungdahm Butler, Ethan E. Timlin, Dennis J. Shim, Kyo-Moon Gerber, James S. Reddy, Vangimalla R. Kim, Soo-Hyung Random Forests for Global and Regional Crop Yield Predictions |
title | Random Forests for Global and Regional Crop Yield Predictions |
title_full | Random Forests for Global and Regional Crop Yield Predictions |
title_fullStr | Random Forests for Global and Regional Crop Yield Predictions |
title_full_unstemmed | Random Forests for Global and Regional Crop Yield Predictions |
title_short | Random Forests for Global and Regional Crop Yield Predictions |
title_sort | random forests for global and regional crop yield predictions |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4892571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27257967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156571 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jeongjighan randomforestsforglobalandregionalcropyieldpredictions AT resopjonathanp randomforestsforglobalandregionalcropyieldpredictions AT muellernathanield randomforestsforglobalandregionalcropyieldpredictions AT fleisherdavidh randomforestsforglobalandregionalcropyieldpredictions AT yunkyungdahm randomforestsforglobalandregionalcropyieldpredictions AT butlerethane randomforestsforglobalandregionalcropyieldpredictions AT timlindennisj randomforestsforglobalandregionalcropyieldpredictions AT shimkyomoon randomforestsforglobalandregionalcropyieldpredictions AT gerberjamess randomforestsforglobalandregionalcropyieldpredictions AT reddyvangimallar randomforestsforglobalandregionalcropyieldpredictions AT kimsoohyung randomforestsforglobalandregionalcropyieldpredictions |