Cargando…

Antibioprophylaxis in Prevention of Endophthalmitis in Intravitreal Injection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Despite endophthalmitis being the most feared complication, antibioprophylaxis remains controversial in intravitreal injections. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of antibioprophylaxis in intravitreal injections in the prevention of endophthalmitis. The Pub...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benoist d’Azy, Cédric, Pereira, Bruno, Naughton, Geraldine, Chiambaretta, Frédéric, Dutheil, Frédéric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4892688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27257676
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156431
_version_ 1782435440407609344
author Benoist d’Azy, Cédric
Pereira, Bruno
Naughton, Geraldine
Chiambaretta, Frédéric
Dutheil, Frédéric
author_facet Benoist d’Azy, Cédric
Pereira, Bruno
Naughton, Geraldine
Chiambaretta, Frédéric
Dutheil, Frédéric
author_sort Benoist d’Azy, Cédric
collection PubMed
description Despite endophthalmitis being the most feared complication, antibioprophylaxis remains controversial in intravitreal injections. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of antibioprophylaxis in intravitreal injections in the prevention of endophthalmitis. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Science Direct databases were searched for studies comparing groups with and without antibiotics in intravitreal injection, with the use of the following keywords: "antibiotic*", "endophthalmitis" and “intravitreal injection*”. To be included, studies needed to specify number of participants and number of endophthalmitis within each group (with and without antibiotics). We conducted meta-analysis on the prevalence of clinical endophthalmitis including both culture-proven and culture negative samples. Nine studies were included. A total of 88 incidences of endophthalmitis were reported from 174,159 injections (0.051% i.e., one incidence of endophthalmitis for 1979 injections). Specifically, 59 incidences of endophthalmitis were reported from 113,530 injections in the group with antibiotics (0.052% or one incidence of endophthalmitis for 1924 injections) and 29 incidences of endophthalmitis from 60,633 injections in the group without antibiotics (0.048% or one endophthalmitis for 2091 injections). Our meta-analysis did not report a significant difference in the prevalence of clinical endophthalimitis between the two groups with and without topical antibiotics: the odds ratio of clinical endophthalimitis was 0.804 (CI95% 0.384–1.682, p = 0.56) for the antibiotic group compared with the group without antibiotics. In conclusion, we performed the first large meta-analysis demonstrating that antibioprophylaxis is not required in intravitreal injections. Strict rules of asepsis remain the only evidence-based prophylaxis of endophthalmitis. The results support initiatives to reduce the global threat of resistance to antibiotics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4892688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48926882016-06-16 Antibioprophylaxis in Prevention of Endophthalmitis in Intravitreal Injection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Benoist d’Azy, Cédric Pereira, Bruno Naughton, Geraldine Chiambaretta, Frédéric Dutheil, Frédéric PLoS One Research Article Despite endophthalmitis being the most feared complication, antibioprophylaxis remains controversial in intravitreal injections. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of antibioprophylaxis in intravitreal injections in the prevention of endophthalmitis. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Science Direct databases were searched for studies comparing groups with and without antibiotics in intravitreal injection, with the use of the following keywords: "antibiotic*", "endophthalmitis" and “intravitreal injection*”. To be included, studies needed to specify number of participants and number of endophthalmitis within each group (with and without antibiotics). We conducted meta-analysis on the prevalence of clinical endophthalmitis including both culture-proven and culture negative samples. Nine studies were included. A total of 88 incidences of endophthalmitis were reported from 174,159 injections (0.051% i.e., one incidence of endophthalmitis for 1979 injections). Specifically, 59 incidences of endophthalmitis were reported from 113,530 injections in the group with antibiotics (0.052% or one incidence of endophthalmitis for 1924 injections) and 29 incidences of endophthalmitis from 60,633 injections in the group without antibiotics (0.048% or one endophthalmitis for 2091 injections). Our meta-analysis did not report a significant difference in the prevalence of clinical endophthalimitis between the two groups with and without topical antibiotics: the odds ratio of clinical endophthalimitis was 0.804 (CI95% 0.384–1.682, p = 0.56) for the antibiotic group compared with the group without antibiotics. In conclusion, we performed the first large meta-analysis demonstrating that antibioprophylaxis is not required in intravitreal injections. Strict rules of asepsis remain the only evidence-based prophylaxis of endophthalmitis. The results support initiatives to reduce the global threat of resistance to antibiotics. Public Library of Science 2016-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4892688/ /pubmed/27257676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156431 Text en © 2016 Benoist d’Azy et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Benoist d’Azy, Cédric
Pereira, Bruno
Naughton, Geraldine
Chiambaretta, Frédéric
Dutheil, Frédéric
Antibioprophylaxis in Prevention of Endophthalmitis in Intravitreal Injection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Antibioprophylaxis in Prevention of Endophthalmitis in Intravitreal Injection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Antibioprophylaxis in Prevention of Endophthalmitis in Intravitreal Injection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Antibioprophylaxis in Prevention of Endophthalmitis in Intravitreal Injection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Antibioprophylaxis in Prevention of Endophthalmitis in Intravitreal Injection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Antibioprophylaxis in Prevention of Endophthalmitis in Intravitreal Injection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort antibioprophylaxis in prevention of endophthalmitis in intravitreal injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4892688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27257676
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156431
work_keys_str_mv AT benoistdazycedric antibioprophylaxisinpreventionofendophthalmitisinintravitrealinjectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pereirabruno antibioprophylaxisinpreventionofendophthalmitisinintravitrealinjectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT naughtongeraldine antibioprophylaxisinpreventionofendophthalmitisinintravitrealinjectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chiambarettafrederic antibioprophylaxisinpreventionofendophthalmitisinintravitrealinjectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dutheilfrederic antibioprophylaxisinpreventionofendophthalmitisinintravitrealinjectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis