Cargando…

Systematic review on the evaluation criteria of orphan medicines in Central and Eastern European countries

BACKGROUND: In case of orphan drugs applicability of the standard health technology assessment (HTA) process is limited due to scarcity of good clinical and health economic evidence. Financing these premium priced drugs is more controversial in the Central and Eastern European (CEE) region where the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zelei, Tamás, Molnár, Mária J., Szegedi, Márta, Kaló, Zoltán
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4893267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27259284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-016-0455-6
_version_ 1782435524011622400
author Zelei, Tamás
Molnár, Mária J.
Szegedi, Márta
Kaló, Zoltán
author_facet Zelei, Tamás
Molnár, Mária J.
Szegedi, Márta
Kaló, Zoltán
author_sort Zelei, Tamás
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In case of orphan drugs applicability of the standard health technology assessment (HTA) process is limited due to scarcity of good clinical and health economic evidence. Financing these premium priced drugs is more controversial in the Central and Eastern European (CEE) region where the public funding resources are more restricted, and health economic justification should be an even more important aspect of policy decisions than in higher income European countries. OBJECTIVES: To explore and summarize the recent scientific evidence on value drivers related to the health technology assessment of ODs with a special focus on the perspective of third party payers in CEE countries. The review aims to list all potentially relevant value drivers in the reimbursement process of orphan drugs. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed; PubMed and Scopus databases were systematically searched for relevant publications until April 2015. Extracted data were summarized along key HTA elements. RESULTS: From the 2664 identified publications, 87 contained relevant information on the evaluation criteria of orphan drugs, but only 5 had direct information from the CEE region. The presentation of good clinical evidence seems to play a key role especially since this should be the basis of cost-effectiveness analyses, which have more importance in resource-constrained economies. Due to external price referencing of pharmaceuticals, the relative budget impact of orphan drugs is expected to be higher in CEE than in Western European (WE) countries unless accessibility of patients remains more limited in poorer European regions. Equity principles based on disease prevalence and non-availability of alternative treatment options may increase the price premium, however, societies must have some control on prices and a rationale based on multiple criteria in reimbursement decisions. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of orphan medicines should include multiple criteria to appropriately measure the clinical added value of orphan drugs. The search found only a small number of studies coming from CEE, therefore European policies on orphan drugs may be based largely on experiences in WE countries. More research should be done in the future in CEE because financing high-priced orphan drugs involves a greater burden for these countries. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13023-016-0455-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4893267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48932672016-06-05 Systematic review on the evaluation criteria of orphan medicines in Central and Eastern European countries Zelei, Tamás Molnár, Mária J. Szegedi, Márta Kaló, Zoltán Orphanet J Rare Dis Review BACKGROUND: In case of orphan drugs applicability of the standard health technology assessment (HTA) process is limited due to scarcity of good clinical and health economic evidence. Financing these premium priced drugs is more controversial in the Central and Eastern European (CEE) region where the public funding resources are more restricted, and health economic justification should be an even more important aspect of policy decisions than in higher income European countries. OBJECTIVES: To explore and summarize the recent scientific evidence on value drivers related to the health technology assessment of ODs with a special focus on the perspective of third party payers in CEE countries. The review aims to list all potentially relevant value drivers in the reimbursement process of orphan drugs. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed; PubMed and Scopus databases were systematically searched for relevant publications until April 2015. Extracted data were summarized along key HTA elements. RESULTS: From the 2664 identified publications, 87 contained relevant information on the evaluation criteria of orphan drugs, but only 5 had direct information from the CEE region. The presentation of good clinical evidence seems to play a key role especially since this should be the basis of cost-effectiveness analyses, which have more importance in resource-constrained economies. Due to external price referencing of pharmaceuticals, the relative budget impact of orphan drugs is expected to be higher in CEE than in Western European (WE) countries unless accessibility of patients remains more limited in poorer European regions. Equity principles based on disease prevalence and non-availability of alternative treatment options may increase the price premium, however, societies must have some control on prices and a rationale based on multiple criteria in reimbursement decisions. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of orphan medicines should include multiple criteria to appropriately measure the clinical added value of orphan drugs. The search found only a small number of studies coming from CEE, therefore European policies on orphan drugs may be based largely on experiences in WE countries. More research should be done in the future in CEE because financing high-priced orphan drugs involves a greater burden for these countries. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13023-016-0455-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4893267/ /pubmed/27259284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-016-0455-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Zelei, Tamás
Molnár, Mária J.
Szegedi, Márta
Kaló, Zoltán
Systematic review on the evaluation criteria of orphan medicines in Central and Eastern European countries
title Systematic review on the evaluation criteria of orphan medicines in Central and Eastern European countries
title_full Systematic review on the evaluation criteria of orphan medicines in Central and Eastern European countries
title_fullStr Systematic review on the evaluation criteria of orphan medicines in Central and Eastern European countries
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review on the evaluation criteria of orphan medicines in Central and Eastern European countries
title_short Systematic review on the evaluation criteria of orphan medicines in Central and Eastern European countries
title_sort systematic review on the evaluation criteria of orphan medicines in central and eastern european countries
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4893267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27259284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-016-0455-6
work_keys_str_mv AT zeleitamas systematicreviewontheevaluationcriteriaoforphanmedicinesincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT molnarmariaj systematicreviewontheevaluationcriteriaoforphanmedicinesincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT szegedimarta systematicreviewontheevaluationcriteriaoforphanmedicinesincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT kalozoltan systematicreviewontheevaluationcriteriaoforphanmedicinesincentralandeasterneuropeancountries