Cargando…

Who benefited from the New Rural Cooperative Medical System in China? A case study on Anhui Province

BACKGROUND: The goal of the New Rural Cooperative Medical System (NCMS) is to decrease the financial burden and improve the health of rural areas. The purpose of the present study is to determine how government subsidies vary between poorer and wealthier groups, especially in low-income regions in r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Lidan, Wang, Anjue, FitzGerald, Gerry, Si, Lei, Jiang, Qicheng, Ye, Dongqing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4893416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27262341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1441-3
_version_ 1782435551392038912
author Wang, Lidan
Wang, Anjue
FitzGerald, Gerry
Si, Lei
Jiang, Qicheng
Ye, Dongqing
author_facet Wang, Lidan
Wang, Anjue
FitzGerald, Gerry
Si, Lei
Jiang, Qicheng
Ye, Dongqing
author_sort Wang, Lidan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The goal of the New Rural Cooperative Medical System (NCMS) is to decrease the financial burden and improve the health of rural areas. The purpose of the present study is to determine how government subsidies vary between poorer and wealthier groups, especially in low-income regions in rural China. METHODS: The distribution, amount, and equity of government subsidies delivered via NCMS to rural residents at different economic levels were assessed using benefit-incidence analysis, concentration index, Kakwani index, Gini index, Lorenz curve, and concentration curve. Household and health institution surveys were conducted in 2010, covering 9701 residents. Household socio-economic status, healthcare costs, out-of-pocket payments, and utilization information were collected in household interviews, and reimbursement policy was provided by institutional survey. RESULTS: The government subsidy concentration index was −0.055 for outpatients and 0.505 for inpatients; and the outpatient and inpatient subsidy Kakwani indexes were −0.376 and 0.184, respectively. The poorest 20 % of populations received 3.4 % of the total subsidy output; while the wealthiest 20 % received 54.3 %. The results showed that the distribution of outpatient subsidies was equitable, but the hospital subsidies disproportionally benefited wealthier people. CONCLUSIONS: Wealthier people benefited more than poorer people from the NCMS in terms of inpatient and total subsidies. For outpatients, the subsidies were unrelated to ability to pay. This contradicts the common belief that the NCMS does not exacerbate benefit inequity. Long-term policy is required to tackle this problem, specifically of redesign the NCMS reimbursement system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4893416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48934162016-06-06 Who benefited from the New Rural Cooperative Medical System in China? A case study on Anhui Province Wang, Lidan Wang, Anjue FitzGerald, Gerry Si, Lei Jiang, Qicheng Ye, Dongqing BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The goal of the New Rural Cooperative Medical System (NCMS) is to decrease the financial burden and improve the health of rural areas. The purpose of the present study is to determine how government subsidies vary between poorer and wealthier groups, especially in low-income regions in rural China. METHODS: The distribution, amount, and equity of government subsidies delivered via NCMS to rural residents at different economic levels were assessed using benefit-incidence analysis, concentration index, Kakwani index, Gini index, Lorenz curve, and concentration curve. Household and health institution surveys were conducted in 2010, covering 9701 residents. Household socio-economic status, healthcare costs, out-of-pocket payments, and utilization information were collected in household interviews, and reimbursement policy was provided by institutional survey. RESULTS: The government subsidy concentration index was −0.055 for outpatients and 0.505 for inpatients; and the outpatient and inpatient subsidy Kakwani indexes were −0.376 and 0.184, respectively. The poorest 20 % of populations received 3.4 % of the total subsidy output; while the wealthiest 20 % received 54.3 %. The results showed that the distribution of outpatient subsidies was equitable, but the hospital subsidies disproportionally benefited wealthier people. CONCLUSIONS: Wealthier people benefited more than poorer people from the NCMS in terms of inpatient and total subsidies. For outpatients, the subsidies were unrelated to ability to pay. This contradicts the common belief that the NCMS does not exacerbate benefit inequity. Long-term policy is required to tackle this problem, specifically of redesign the NCMS reimbursement system. BioMed Central 2016-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4893416/ /pubmed/27262341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1441-3 Text en © Wang et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Lidan
Wang, Anjue
FitzGerald, Gerry
Si, Lei
Jiang, Qicheng
Ye, Dongqing
Who benefited from the New Rural Cooperative Medical System in China? A case study on Anhui Province
title Who benefited from the New Rural Cooperative Medical System in China? A case study on Anhui Province
title_full Who benefited from the New Rural Cooperative Medical System in China? A case study on Anhui Province
title_fullStr Who benefited from the New Rural Cooperative Medical System in China? A case study on Anhui Province
title_full_unstemmed Who benefited from the New Rural Cooperative Medical System in China? A case study on Anhui Province
title_short Who benefited from the New Rural Cooperative Medical System in China? A case study on Anhui Province
title_sort who benefited from the new rural cooperative medical system in china? a case study on anhui province
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4893416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27262341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1441-3
work_keys_str_mv AT wanglidan whobenefitedfromthenewruralcooperativemedicalsysteminchinaacasestudyonanhuiprovince
AT wanganjue whobenefitedfromthenewruralcooperativemedicalsysteminchinaacasestudyonanhuiprovince
AT fitzgeraldgerry whobenefitedfromthenewruralcooperativemedicalsysteminchinaacasestudyonanhuiprovince
AT silei whobenefitedfromthenewruralcooperativemedicalsysteminchinaacasestudyonanhuiprovince
AT jiangqicheng whobenefitedfromthenewruralcooperativemedicalsysteminchinaacasestudyonanhuiprovince
AT yedongqing whobenefitedfromthenewruralcooperativemedicalsysteminchinaacasestudyonanhuiprovince