Cargando…
Who benefited from the New Rural Cooperative Medical System in China? A case study on Anhui Province
BACKGROUND: The goal of the New Rural Cooperative Medical System (NCMS) is to decrease the financial burden and improve the health of rural areas. The purpose of the present study is to determine how government subsidies vary between poorer and wealthier groups, especially in low-income regions in r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4893416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27262341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1441-3 |
_version_ | 1782435551392038912 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Lidan Wang, Anjue FitzGerald, Gerry Si, Lei Jiang, Qicheng Ye, Dongqing |
author_facet | Wang, Lidan Wang, Anjue FitzGerald, Gerry Si, Lei Jiang, Qicheng Ye, Dongqing |
author_sort | Wang, Lidan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The goal of the New Rural Cooperative Medical System (NCMS) is to decrease the financial burden and improve the health of rural areas. The purpose of the present study is to determine how government subsidies vary between poorer and wealthier groups, especially in low-income regions in rural China. METHODS: The distribution, amount, and equity of government subsidies delivered via NCMS to rural residents at different economic levels were assessed using benefit-incidence analysis, concentration index, Kakwani index, Gini index, Lorenz curve, and concentration curve. Household and health institution surveys were conducted in 2010, covering 9701 residents. Household socio-economic status, healthcare costs, out-of-pocket payments, and utilization information were collected in household interviews, and reimbursement policy was provided by institutional survey. RESULTS: The government subsidy concentration index was −0.055 for outpatients and 0.505 for inpatients; and the outpatient and inpatient subsidy Kakwani indexes were −0.376 and 0.184, respectively. The poorest 20 % of populations received 3.4 % of the total subsidy output; while the wealthiest 20 % received 54.3 %. The results showed that the distribution of outpatient subsidies was equitable, but the hospital subsidies disproportionally benefited wealthier people. CONCLUSIONS: Wealthier people benefited more than poorer people from the NCMS in terms of inpatient and total subsidies. For outpatients, the subsidies were unrelated to ability to pay. This contradicts the common belief that the NCMS does not exacerbate benefit inequity. Long-term policy is required to tackle this problem, specifically of redesign the NCMS reimbursement system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4893416 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48934162016-06-06 Who benefited from the New Rural Cooperative Medical System in China? A case study on Anhui Province Wang, Lidan Wang, Anjue FitzGerald, Gerry Si, Lei Jiang, Qicheng Ye, Dongqing BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The goal of the New Rural Cooperative Medical System (NCMS) is to decrease the financial burden and improve the health of rural areas. The purpose of the present study is to determine how government subsidies vary between poorer and wealthier groups, especially in low-income regions in rural China. METHODS: The distribution, amount, and equity of government subsidies delivered via NCMS to rural residents at different economic levels were assessed using benefit-incidence analysis, concentration index, Kakwani index, Gini index, Lorenz curve, and concentration curve. Household and health institution surveys were conducted in 2010, covering 9701 residents. Household socio-economic status, healthcare costs, out-of-pocket payments, and utilization information were collected in household interviews, and reimbursement policy was provided by institutional survey. RESULTS: The government subsidy concentration index was −0.055 for outpatients and 0.505 for inpatients; and the outpatient and inpatient subsidy Kakwani indexes were −0.376 and 0.184, respectively. The poorest 20 % of populations received 3.4 % of the total subsidy output; while the wealthiest 20 % received 54.3 %. The results showed that the distribution of outpatient subsidies was equitable, but the hospital subsidies disproportionally benefited wealthier people. CONCLUSIONS: Wealthier people benefited more than poorer people from the NCMS in terms of inpatient and total subsidies. For outpatients, the subsidies were unrelated to ability to pay. This contradicts the common belief that the NCMS does not exacerbate benefit inequity. Long-term policy is required to tackle this problem, specifically of redesign the NCMS reimbursement system. BioMed Central 2016-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4893416/ /pubmed/27262341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1441-3 Text en © Wang et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wang, Lidan Wang, Anjue FitzGerald, Gerry Si, Lei Jiang, Qicheng Ye, Dongqing Who benefited from the New Rural Cooperative Medical System in China? A case study on Anhui Province |
title | Who benefited from the New Rural Cooperative Medical System in China? A case study on Anhui Province |
title_full | Who benefited from the New Rural Cooperative Medical System in China? A case study on Anhui Province |
title_fullStr | Who benefited from the New Rural Cooperative Medical System in China? A case study on Anhui Province |
title_full_unstemmed | Who benefited from the New Rural Cooperative Medical System in China? A case study on Anhui Province |
title_short | Who benefited from the New Rural Cooperative Medical System in China? A case study on Anhui Province |
title_sort | who benefited from the new rural cooperative medical system in china? a case study on anhui province |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4893416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27262341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1441-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wanglidan whobenefitedfromthenewruralcooperativemedicalsysteminchinaacasestudyonanhuiprovince AT wanganjue whobenefitedfromthenewruralcooperativemedicalsysteminchinaacasestudyonanhuiprovince AT fitzgeraldgerry whobenefitedfromthenewruralcooperativemedicalsysteminchinaacasestudyonanhuiprovince AT silei whobenefitedfromthenewruralcooperativemedicalsysteminchinaacasestudyonanhuiprovince AT jiangqicheng whobenefitedfromthenewruralcooperativemedicalsysteminchinaacasestudyonanhuiprovince AT yedongqing whobenefitedfromthenewruralcooperativemedicalsysteminchinaacasestudyonanhuiprovince |