Cargando…

Validation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnoses in healthcare databases: a systematic review protocol

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare databases are useful sources to investigate the epidemiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), to assess longitudinal outcomes in patients with COPD, and to develop disease management strategies. However, in order to constitute a reliable source for research,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rimland, Joseph M, Abraha, Iosief, Luchetta, Maria Laura, Cozzolino, Francesco, Orso, Massimiliano, Cherubini, Antonio, Dell'Aquila, Giuseppina, Chiatti, Carlos, Ambrosio, Giuseppe, Montedori, Alessandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4893853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27251687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011777
_version_ 1782435629426016256
author Rimland, Joseph M
Abraha, Iosief
Luchetta, Maria Laura
Cozzolino, Francesco
Orso, Massimiliano
Cherubini, Antonio
Dell'Aquila, Giuseppina
Chiatti, Carlos
Ambrosio, Giuseppe
Montedori, Alessandro
author_facet Rimland, Joseph M
Abraha, Iosief
Luchetta, Maria Laura
Cozzolino, Francesco
Orso, Massimiliano
Cherubini, Antonio
Dell'Aquila, Giuseppina
Chiatti, Carlos
Ambrosio, Giuseppe
Montedori, Alessandro
author_sort Rimland, Joseph M
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Healthcare databases are useful sources to investigate the epidemiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), to assess longitudinal outcomes in patients with COPD, and to develop disease management strategies. However, in order to constitute a reliable source for research, healthcare databases need to be validated. The aim of this protocol is to perform the first systematic review of studies reporting the validation of codes related to COPD diagnoses in healthcare databases. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library databases will be searched using appropriate search strategies. Studies that evaluated the validity of COPD codes (such as the International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision and 10th Revision system; the Real codes system or the International Classification of Primary Care) in healthcare databases will be included. Inclusion criteria will be: (1) the presence of a reference standard case definition for COPD; (2) the presence of at least one test measure (eg, sensitivity, positive predictive values, etc); and (3) the use of a healthcare database (including administrative claims databases, electronic healthcare databases or COPD registries) as a data source. Pairs of reviewers will independently abstract data using standardised forms and will assess quality using a checklist based on the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy (STARD) criteria. This systematic review protocol has been produced in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required. Results of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. The results from this systematic review will be used for outcome research on COPD and will serve as a guide to identify appropriate case definitions of COPD, and reference standards, for researchers involved in validating healthcare databases. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015029204.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4893853
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48938532016-06-09 Validation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnoses in healthcare databases: a systematic review protocol Rimland, Joseph M Abraha, Iosief Luchetta, Maria Laura Cozzolino, Francesco Orso, Massimiliano Cherubini, Antonio Dell'Aquila, Giuseppina Chiatti, Carlos Ambrosio, Giuseppe Montedori, Alessandro BMJ Open Research Methods INTRODUCTION: Healthcare databases are useful sources to investigate the epidemiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), to assess longitudinal outcomes in patients with COPD, and to develop disease management strategies. However, in order to constitute a reliable source for research, healthcare databases need to be validated. The aim of this protocol is to perform the first systematic review of studies reporting the validation of codes related to COPD diagnoses in healthcare databases. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library databases will be searched using appropriate search strategies. Studies that evaluated the validity of COPD codes (such as the International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision and 10th Revision system; the Real codes system or the International Classification of Primary Care) in healthcare databases will be included. Inclusion criteria will be: (1) the presence of a reference standard case definition for COPD; (2) the presence of at least one test measure (eg, sensitivity, positive predictive values, etc); and (3) the use of a healthcare database (including administrative claims databases, electronic healthcare databases or COPD registries) as a data source. Pairs of reviewers will independently abstract data using standardised forms and will assess quality using a checklist based on the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy (STARD) criteria. This systematic review protocol has been produced in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required. Results of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. The results from this systematic review will be used for outcome research on COPD and will serve as a guide to identify appropriate case definitions of COPD, and reference standards, for researchers involved in validating healthcare databases. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015029204. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4893853/ /pubmed/27251687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011777 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Research Methods
Rimland, Joseph M
Abraha, Iosief
Luchetta, Maria Laura
Cozzolino, Francesco
Orso, Massimiliano
Cherubini, Antonio
Dell'Aquila, Giuseppina
Chiatti, Carlos
Ambrosio, Giuseppe
Montedori, Alessandro
Validation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnoses in healthcare databases: a systematic review protocol
title Validation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnoses in healthcare databases: a systematic review protocol
title_full Validation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnoses in healthcare databases: a systematic review protocol
title_fullStr Validation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnoses in healthcare databases: a systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Validation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnoses in healthcare databases: a systematic review protocol
title_short Validation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnoses in healthcare databases: a systematic review protocol
title_sort validation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (copd) diagnoses in healthcare databases: a systematic review protocol
topic Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4893853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27251687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011777
work_keys_str_mv AT rimlandjosephm validationofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopddiagnosesinhealthcaredatabasesasystematicreviewprotocol
AT abrahaiosief validationofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopddiagnosesinhealthcaredatabasesasystematicreviewprotocol
AT luchettamarialaura validationofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopddiagnosesinhealthcaredatabasesasystematicreviewprotocol
AT cozzolinofrancesco validationofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopddiagnosesinhealthcaredatabasesasystematicreviewprotocol
AT orsomassimiliano validationofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopddiagnosesinhealthcaredatabasesasystematicreviewprotocol
AT cherubiniantonio validationofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopddiagnosesinhealthcaredatabasesasystematicreviewprotocol
AT dellaquilagiuseppina validationofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopddiagnosesinhealthcaredatabasesasystematicreviewprotocol
AT chiatticarlos validationofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopddiagnosesinhealthcaredatabasesasystematicreviewprotocol
AT ambrosiogiuseppe validationofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopddiagnosesinhealthcaredatabasesasystematicreviewprotocol
AT montedorialessandro validationofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopddiagnosesinhealthcaredatabasesasystematicreviewprotocol