Cargando…
Validation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnoses in healthcare databases: a systematic review protocol
INTRODUCTION: Healthcare databases are useful sources to investigate the epidemiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), to assess longitudinal outcomes in patients with COPD, and to develop disease management strategies. However, in order to constitute a reliable source for research,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4893853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27251687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011777 |
_version_ | 1782435629426016256 |
---|---|
author | Rimland, Joseph M Abraha, Iosief Luchetta, Maria Laura Cozzolino, Francesco Orso, Massimiliano Cherubini, Antonio Dell'Aquila, Giuseppina Chiatti, Carlos Ambrosio, Giuseppe Montedori, Alessandro |
author_facet | Rimland, Joseph M Abraha, Iosief Luchetta, Maria Laura Cozzolino, Francesco Orso, Massimiliano Cherubini, Antonio Dell'Aquila, Giuseppina Chiatti, Carlos Ambrosio, Giuseppe Montedori, Alessandro |
author_sort | Rimland, Joseph M |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Healthcare databases are useful sources to investigate the epidemiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), to assess longitudinal outcomes in patients with COPD, and to develop disease management strategies. However, in order to constitute a reliable source for research, healthcare databases need to be validated. The aim of this protocol is to perform the first systematic review of studies reporting the validation of codes related to COPD diagnoses in healthcare databases. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library databases will be searched using appropriate search strategies. Studies that evaluated the validity of COPD codes (such as the International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision and 10th Revision system; the Real codes system or the International Classification of Primary Care) in healthcare databases will be included. Inclusion criteria will be: (1) the presence of a reference standard case definition for COPD; (2) the presence of at least one test measure (eg, sensitivity, positive predictive values, etc); and (3) the use of a healthcare database (including administrative claims databases, electronic healthcare databases or COPD registries) as a data source. Pairs of reviewers will independently abstract data using standardised forms and will assess quality using a checklist based on the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy (STARD) criteria. This systematic review protocol has been produced in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required. Results of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. The results from this systematic review will be used for outcome research on COPD and will serve as a guide to identify appropriate case definitions of COPD, and reference standards, for researchers involved in validating healthcare databases. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015029204. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4893853 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48938532016-06-09 Validation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnoses in healthcare databases: a systematic review protocol Rimland, Joseph M Abraha, Iosief Luchetta, Maria Laura Cozzolino, Francesco Orso, Massimiliano Cherubini, Antonio Dell'Aquila, Giuseppina Chiatti, Carlos Ambrosio, Giuseppe Montedori, Alessandro BMJ Open Research Methods INTRODUCTION: Healthcare databases are useful sources to investigate the epidemiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), to assess longitudinal outcomes in patients with COPD, and to develop disease management strategies. However, in order to constitute a reliable source for research, healthcare databases need to be validated. The aim of this protocol is to perform the first systematic review of studies reporting the validation of codes related to COPD diagnoses in healthcare databases. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library databases will be searched using appropriate search strategies. Studies that evaluated the validity of COPD codes (such as the International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision and 10th Revision system; the Real codes system or the International Classification of Primary Care) in healthcare databases will be included. Inclusion criteria will be: (1) the presence of a reference standard case definition for COPD; (2) the presence of at least one test measure (eg, sensitivity, positive predictive values, etc); and (3) the use of a healthcare database (including administrative claims databases, electronic healthcare databases or COPD registries) as a data source. Pairs of reviewers will independently abstract data using standardised forms and will assess quality using a checklist based on the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy (STARD) criteria. This systematic review protocol has been produced in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required. Results of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. The results from this systematic review will be used for outcome research on COPD and will serve as a guide to identify appropriate case definitions of COPD, and reference standards, for researchers involved in validating healthcare databases. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015029204. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4893853/ /pubmed/27251687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011777 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Research Methods Rimland, Joseph M Abraha, Iosief Luchetta, Maria Laura Cozzolino, Francesco Orso, Massimiliano Cherubini, Antonio Dell'Aquila, Giuseppina Chiatti, Carlos Ambrosio, Giuseppe Montedori, Alessandro Validation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnoses in healthcare databases: a systematic review protocol |
title | Validation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnoses in healthcare databases: a systematic review protocol |
title_full | Validation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnoses in healthcare databases: a systematic review protocol |
title_fullStr | Validation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnoses in healthcare databases: a systematic review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnoses in healthcare databases: a systematic review protocol |
title_short | Validation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnoses in healthcare databases: a systematic review protocol |
title_sort | validation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (copd) diagnoses in healthcare databases: a systematic review protocol |
topic | Research Methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4893853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27251687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011777 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rimlandjosephm validationofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopddiagnosesinhealthcaredatabasesasystematicreviewprotocol AT abrahaiosief validationofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopddiagnosesinhealthcaredatabasesasystematicreviewprotocol AT luchettamarialaura validationofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopddiagnosesinhealthcaredatabasesasystematicreviewprotocol AT cozzolinofrancesco validationofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopddiagnosesinhealthcaredatabasesasystematicreviewprotocol AT orsomassimiliano validationofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopddiagnosesinhealthcaredatabasesasystematicreviewprotocol AT cherubiniantonio validationofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopddiagnosesinhealthcaredatabasesasystematicreviewprotocol AT dellaquilagiuseppina validationofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopddiagnosesinhealthcaredatabasesasystematicreviewprotocol AT chiatticarlos validationofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopddiagnosesinhealthcaredatabasesasystematicreviewprotocol AT ambrosiogiuseppe validationofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopddiagnosesinhealthcaredatabasesasystematicreviewprotocol AT montedorialessandro validationofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasecopddiagnosesinhealthcaredatabasesasystematicreviewprotocol |