Cargando…
Conflict of interest between professional medical societies and industry: a cross-sectional study of Italian medical societies’ websites
OBJECTIVE: To describe how Italian medical societies interact with pharmaceutical and medical device industries through an analysis of the information available on their websites. DESIGN: Cross sectional study. SETTING: Italy. PARTICIPANTS: 154 medical societies registered with the Italian Federatio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4893870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27251686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011124 |
_version_ | 1782435633117003776 |
---|---|
author | Fabbri, Alice Gregoraci, Giorgia Tedesco, Dario Ferretti, Filippo Gilardi, Francesco Iemmi, Diego Lisi, Cosima Lorusso, Angelo Natali, Francesca Shahi, Edit Rinaldi, Alessandro |
author_facet | Fabbri, Alice Gregoraci, Giorgia Tedesco, Dario Ferretti, Filippo Gilardi, Francesco Iemmi, Diego Lisi, Cosima Lorusso, Angelo Natali, Francesca Shahi, Edit Rinaldi, Alessandro |
author_sort | Fabbri, Alice |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To describe how Italian medical societies interact with pharmaceutical and medical device industries through an analysis of the information available on their websites. DESIGN: Cross sectional study. SETTING: Italy. PARTICIPANTS: 154 medical societies registered with the Italian Federation of Medical-Scientific Societies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Indicators of industry sponsorship (presence of industry sponsorship in the programme of the last medical societies’ annual conference; presence of manufacturers’ logos on the homepage; presence of industry sponsorship of satellite symposia during the last annual conference). RESULTS: 131 Italian medical societies were considered. Of these, 4.6% had an ethical code covering relationships with industry on their websites, while 45.6% had a statute that mentioned the issue of conflict of interest and 6.1% published the annual financial report. With regard to industry sponsorship, 64.9% received private sponsorship for their last conference, 29.0% had manufacturers’ logos on their webpage, while 35.9% had industry-sponsored satellite symposia at their last conference. The presence of an ethical code on the societies’ websites was associated with both an increased risk of industry sponsorship of the last conference (relative risk (RR) 1.22, 95% CIs 1.01 to 1.48 after adjustment) and of conferences and/or satellite symposia (RR 1.22, 95% CIs 1.02 to 1.48 after adjustment) but not with the presence of manufacturers’ logos on the websites (RR 1.79, 95% CIs 0.66 to 4.82 after adjustment). No association was observed with the other indicators of governance and transparency. CONCLUSIONS: This survey shows that industry sponsorship of Italian medical societies’ conferences is common, while the presence of a structured regulatory system is not. Disclosure of the amount of industry funding to medical societies is scarce. The level of transparency therefore needs to be improved and the whole relationship between medical societies and industry should be further disciplined in order to avoid any potential for conflict of interest. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4893870 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48938702016-06-09 Conflict of interest between professional medical societies and industry: a cross-sectional study of Italian medical societies’ websites Fabbri, Alice Gregoraci, Giorgia Tedesco, Dario Ferretti, Filippo Gilardi, Francesco Iemmi, Diego Lisi, Cosima Lorusso, Angelo Natali, Francesca Shahi, Edit Rinaldi, Alessandro BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVE: To describe how Italian medical societies interact with pharmaceutical and medical device industries through an analysis of the information available on their websites. DESIGN: Cross sectional study. SETTING: Italy. PARTICIPANTS: 154 medical societies registered with the Italian Federation of Medical-Scientific Societies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Indicators of industry sponsorship (presence of industry sponsorship in the programme of the last medical societies’ annual conference; presence of manufacturers’ logos on the homepage; presence of industry sponsorship of satellite symposia during the last annual conference). RESULTS: 131 Italian medical societies were considered. Of these, 4.6% had an ethical code covering relationships with industry on their websites, while 45.6% had a statute that mentioned the issue of conflict of interest and 6.1% published the annual financial report. With regard to industry sponsorship, 64.9% received private sponsorship for their last conference, 29.0% had manufacturers’ logos on their webpage, while 35.9% had industry-sponsored satellite symposia at their last conference. The presence of an ethical code on the societies’ websites was associated with both an increased risk of industry sponsorship of the last conference (relative risk (RR) 1.22, 95% CIs 1.01 to 1.48 after adjustment) and of conferences and/or satellite symposia (RR 1.22, 95% CIs 1.02 to 1.48 after adjustment) but not with the presence of manufacturers’ logos on the websites (RR 1.79, 95% CIs 0.66 to 4.82 after adjustment). No association was observed with the other indicators of governance and transparency. CONCLUSIONS: This survey shows that industry sponsorship of Italian medical societies’ conferences is common, while the presence of a structured regulatory system is not. Disclosure of the amount of industry funding to medical societies is scarce. The level of transparency therefore needs to be improved and the whole relationship between medical societies and industry should be further disciplined in order to avoid any potential for conflict of interest. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4893870/ /pubmed/27251686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011124 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Public Health Fabbri, Alice Gregoraci, Giorgia Tedesco, Dario Ferretti, Filippo Gilardi, Francesco Iemmi, Diego Lisi, Cosima Lorusso, Angelo Natali, Francesca Shahi, Edit Rinaldi, Alessandro Conflict of interest between professional medical societies and industry: a cross-sectional study of Italian medical societies’ websites |
title | Conflict of interest between professional medical societies and industry: a cross-sectional study of Italian medical societies’ websites |
title_full | Conflict of interest between professional medical societies and industry: a cross-sectional study of Italian medical societies’ websites |
title_fullStr | Conflict of interest between professional medical societies and industry: a cross-sectional study of Italian medical societies’ websites |
title_full_unstemmed | Conflict of interest between professional medical societies and industry: a cross-sectional study of Italian medical societies’ websites |
title_short | Conflict of interest between professional medical societies and industry: a cross-sectional study of Italian medical societies’ websites |
title_sort | conflict of interest between professional medical societies and industry: a cross-sectional study of italian medical societies’ websites |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4893870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27251686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011124 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fabbrialice conflictofinterestbetweenprofessionalmedicalsocietiesandindustryacrosssectionalstudyofitalianmedicalsocietieswebsites AT gregoracigiorgia conflictofinterestbetweenprofessionalmedicalsocietiesandindustryacrosssectionalstudyofitalianmedicalsocietieswebsites AT tedescodario conflictofinterestbetweenprofessionalmedicalsocietiesandindustryacrosssectionalstudyofitalianmedicalsocietieswebsites AT ferrettifilippo conflictofinterestbetweenprofessionalmedicalsocietiesandindustryacrosssectionalstudyofitalianmedicalsocietieswebsites AT gilardifrancesco conflictofinterestbetweenprofessionalmedicalsocietiesandindustryacrosssectionalstudyofitalianmedicalsocietieswebsites AT iemmidiego conflictofinterestbetweenprofessionalmedicalsocietiesandindustryacrosssectionalstudyofitalianmedicalsocietieswebsites AT lisicosima conflictofinterestbetweenprofessionalmedicalsocietiesandindustryacrosssectionalstudyofitalianmedicalsocietieswebsites AT lorussoangelo conflictofinterestbetweenprofessionalmedicalsocietiesandindustryacrosssectionalstudyofitalianmedicalsocietieswebsites AT natalifrancesca conflictofinterestbetweenprofessionalmedicalsocietiesandindustryacrosssectionalstudyofitalianmedicalsocietieswebsites AT shahiedit conflictofinterestbetweenprofessionalmedicalsocietiesandindustryacrosssectionalstudyofitalianmedicalsocietieswebsites AT rinaldialessandro conflictofinterestbetweenprofessionalmedicalsocietiesandindustryacrosssectionalstudyofitalianmedicalsocietieswebsites |