Cargando…

Single Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Masses: A Retrospective Study of Feasibility and Safety

BACKGROUND: Single port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) is an innovative approach that is rapidly gaining recognition worldwide. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and safety of SPLS compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of benign adnexal masses. METHODS: In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Si-Yun, Yin, Ling, Guan, Xiao-Ming, Xiao, Bing-Bing, Zhang, Yan, Delgado, Amanda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4894040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27231167
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.182829
_version_ 1782435643098398720
author Wang, Si-Yun
Yin, Ling
Guan, Xiao-Ming
Xiao, Bing-Bing
Zhang, Yan
Delgado, Amanda
author_facet Wang, Si-Yun
Yin, Ling
Guan, Xiao-Ming
Xiao, Bing-Bing
Zhang, Yan
Delgado, Amanda
author_sort Wang, Si-Yun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Single port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) is an innovative approach that is rapidly gaining recognition worldwide. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and safety of SPLS compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of benign adnexal masses. METHODS: In total, 99 patients who underwent SPLS for benign adnexal masses between December 2013 and March 2015 were compared to a nonrandomized control group comprising 104 conventional laparoscopic adnexal surgeries that were performed during the same period. We retrospectively analyzed multiple clinical characteristics and operative outcomes of all the patients, including age, body mass index, size and pathological type of ovarian mass, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), duration of postoperative hospital stay, etc. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding preoperative baseline characteristics. However, the pathological results between the two groups were found to be slightly different. The most common pathological type in the SPLS group was mature cystic teratoma, whereas endometrioma was more commonly seen in the control group. Otherwise, the two groups had comparable surgical outcomes, including the median operation time (51 min vs. 52 min, P = 0.909), the median decreased level of hemoglobin from preoperation to postoperation day 3 (10 g/L vs. 10 g/L, P = 0.795), and the median duration of postoperative hospital stay (3 days vs. 3 days, P = 0.168). In SPLS groups, the median EBL and the anal exsufflation time were significantly less than those of the conventional group (5 ml vs. 10 ml, P < 0.001; 10 h vs. 22 h, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SPLS is a feasible and safe approach for the treatment of benign adnexal masses. Further study is required to better determine whether SPLS has significant benefits compared to conventional techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4894040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48940402016-06-13 Single Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Masses: A Retrospective Study of Feasibility and Safety Wang, Si-Yun Yin, Ling Guan, Xiao-Ming Xiao, Bing-Bing Zhang, Yan Delgado, Amanda Chin Med J (Engl) Original Article BACKGROUND: Single port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) is an innovative approach that is rapidly gaining recognition worldwide. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and safety of SPLS compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of benign adnexal masses. METHODS: In total, 99 patients who underwent SPLS for benign adnexal masses between December 2013 and March 2015 were compared to a nonrandomized control group comprising 104 conventional laparoscopic adnexal surgeries that were performed during the same period. We retrospectively analyzed multiple clinical characteristics and operative outcomes of all the patients, including age, body mass index, size and pathological type of ovarian mass, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), duration of postoperative hospital stay, etc. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding preoperative baseline characteristics. However, the pathological results between the two groups were found to be slightly different. The most common pathological type in the SPLS group was mature cystic teratoma, whereas endometrioma was more commonly seen in the control group. Otherwise, the two groups had comparable surgical outcomes, including the median operation time (51 min vs. 52 min, P = 0.909), the median decreased level of hemoglobin from preoperation to postoperation day 3 (10 g/L vs. 10 g/L, P = 0.795), and the median duration of postoperative hospital stay (3 days vs. 3 days, P = 0.168). In SPLS groups, the median EBL and the anal exsufflation time were significantly less than those of the conventional group (5 ml vs. 10 ml, P < 0.001; 10 h vs. 22 h, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SPLS is a feasible and safe approach for the treatment of benign adnexal masses. Further study is required to better determine whether SPLS has significant benefits compared to conventional techniques. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4894040/ /pubmed/27231167 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.182829 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Chinese Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Wang, Si-Yun
Yin, Ling
Guan, Xiao-Ming
Xiao, Bing-Bing
Zhang, Yan
Delgado, Amanda
Single Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Masses: A Retrospective Study of Feasibility and Safety
title Single Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Masses: A Retrospective Study of Feasibility and Safety
title_full Single Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Masses: A Retrospective Study of Feasibility and Safety
title_fullStr Single Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Masses: A Retrospective Study of Feasibility and Safety
title_full_unstemmed Single Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Masses: A Retrospective Study of Feasibility and Safety
title_short Single Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Masses: A Retrospective Study of Feasibility and Safety
title_sort single port transumbilical laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign adnexal masses: a retrospective study of feasibility and safety
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4894040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27231167
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.182829
work_keys_str_mv AT wangsiyun singleporttransumbilicallaparoscopicsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforbenignadnexalmassesaretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandsafety
AT yinling singleporttransumbilicallaparoscopicsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforbenignadnexalmassesaretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandsafety
AT guanxiaoming singleporttransumbilicallaparoscopicsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforbenignadnexalmassesaretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandsafety
AT xiaobingbing singleporttransumbilicallaparoscopicsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforbenignadnexalmassesaretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandsafety
AT zhangyan singleporttransumbilicallaparoscopicsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforbenignadnexalmassesaretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandsafety
AT delgadoamanda singleporttransumbilicallaparoscopicsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforbenignadnexalmassesaretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandsafety