Cargando…
Single Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Masses: A Retrospective Study of Feasibility and Safety
BACKGROUND: Single port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) is an innovative approach that is rapidly gaining recognition worldwide. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and safety of SPLS compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of benign adnexal masses. METHODS: In...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4894040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27231167 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.182829 |
_version_ | 1782435643098398720 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Si-Yun Yin, Ling Guan, Xiao-Ming Xiao, Bing-Bing Zhang, Yan Delgado, Amanda |
author_facet | Wang, Si-Yun Yin, Ling Guan, Xiao-Ming Xiao, Bing-Bing Zhang, Yan Delgado, Amanda |
author_sort | Wang, Si-Yun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Single port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) is an innovative approach that is rapidly gaining recognition worldwide. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and safety of SPLS compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of benign adnexal masses. METHODS: In total, 99 patients who underwent SPLS for benign adnexal masses between December 2013 and March 2015 were compared to a nonrandomized control group comprising 104 conventional laparoscopic adnexal surgeries that were performed during the same period. We retrospectively analyzed multiple clinical characteristics and operative outcomes of all the patients, including age, body mass index, size and pathological type of ovarian mass, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), duration of postoperative hospital stay, etc. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding preoperative baseline characteristics. However, the pathological results between the two groups were found to be slightly different. The most common pathological type in the SPLS group was mature cystic teratoma, whereas endometrioma was more commonly seen in the control group. Otherwise, the two groups had comparable surgical outcomes, including the median operation time (51 min vs. 52 min, P = 0.909), the median decreased level of hemoglobin from preoperation to postoperation day 3 (10 g/L vs. 10 g/L, P = 0.795), and the median duration of postoperative hospital stay (3 days vs. 3 days, P = 0.168). In SPLS groups, the median EBL and the anal exsufflation time were significantly less than those of the conventional group (5 ml vs. 10 ml, P < 0.001; 10 h vs. 22 h, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SPLS is a feasible and safe approach for the treatment of benign adnexal masses. Further study is required to better determine whether SPLS has significant benefits compared to conventional techniques. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4894040 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48940402016-06-13 Single Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Masses: A Retrospective Study of Feasibility and Safety Wang, Si-Yun Yin, Ling Guan, Xiao-Ming Xiao, Bing-Bing Zhang, Yan Delgado, Amanda Chin Med J (Engl) Original Article BACKGROUND: Single port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) is an innovative approach that is rapidly gaining recognition worldwide. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and safety of SPLS compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of benign adnexal masses. METHODS: In total, 99 patients who underwent SPLS for benign adnexal masses between December 2013 and March 2015 were compared to a nonrandomized control group comprising 104 conventional laparoscopic adnexal surgeries that were performed during the same period. We retrospectively analyzed multiple clinical characteristics and operative outcomes of all the patients, including age, body mass index, size and pathological type of ovarian mass, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), duration of postoperative hospital stay, etc. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding preoperative baseline characteristics. However, the pathological results between the two groups were found to be slightly different. The most common pathological type in the SPLS group was mature cystic teratoma, whereas endometrioma was more commonly seen in the control group. Otherwise, the two groups had comparable surgical outcomes, including the median operation time (51 min vs. 52 min, P = 0.909), the median decreased level of hemoglobin from preoperation to postoperation day 3 (10 g/L vs. 10 g/L, P = 0.795), and the median duration of postoperative hospital stay (3 days vs. 3 days, P = 0.168). In SPLS groups, the median EBL and the anal exsufflation time were significantly less than those of the conventional group (5 ml vs. 10 ml, P < 0.001; 10 h vs. 22 h, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SPLS is a feasible and safe approach for the treatment of benign adnexal masses. Further study is required to better determine whether SPLS has significant benefits compared to conventional techniques. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4894040/ /pubmed/27231167 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.182829 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Chinese Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wang, Si-Yun Yin, Ling Guan, Xiao-Ming Xiao, Bing-Bing Zhang, Yan Delgado, Amanda Single Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Masses: A Retrospective Study of Feasibility and Safety |
title | Single Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Masses: A Retrospective Study of Feasibility and Safety |
title_full | Single Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Masses: A Retrospective Study of Feasibility and Safety |
title_fullStr | Single Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Masses: A Retrospective Study of Feasibility and Safety |
title_full_unstemmed | Single Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Masses: A Retrospective Study of Feasibility and Safety |
title_short | Single Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Masses: A Retrospective Study of Feasibility and Safety |
title_sort | single port transumbilical laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign adnexal masses: a retrospective study of feasibility and safety |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4894040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27231167 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.182829 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangsiyun singleporttransumbilicallaparoscopicsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforbenignadnexalmassesaretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandsafety AT yinling singleporttransumbilicallaparoscopicsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforbenignadnexalmassesaretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandsafety AT guanxiaoming singleporttransumbilicallaparoscopicsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforbenignadnexalmassesaretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandsafety AT xiaobingbing singleporttransumbilicallaparoscopicsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforbenignadnexalmassesaretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandsafety AT zhangyan singleporttransumbilicallaparoscopicsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforbenignadnexalmassesaretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandsafety AT delgadoamanda singleporttransumbilicallaparoscopicsurgeryversusconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforbenignadnexalmassesaretrospectivestudyoffeasibilityandsafety |