Cargando…

Oculomotor interference of bimodal distractors

When executing an eye movement to a target location, the presence of an irrelevant distracting stimulus can influence the saccade metrics and latency. The present study investigated the influence of distractors of different sensory modalities (i.e. auditory, visual and audiovisual) which were presen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heeman, Jessica, Nijboer, Tanja C.W., Van der Stoep, Nathan, Theeuwes, Jan, Van der Stigchel, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4894297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27164053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2016.04.002
_version_ 1782435658928750592
author Heeman, Jessica
Nijboer, Tanja C.W.
Van der Stoep, Nathan
Theeuwes, Jan
Van der Stigchel, Stefan
author_facet Heeman, Jessica
Nijboer, Tanja C.W.
Van der Stoep, Nathan
Theeuwes, Jan
Van der Stigchel, Stefan
author_sort Heeman, Jessica
collection PubMed
description When executing an eye movement to a target location, the presence of an irrelevant distracting stimulus can influence the saccade metrics and latency. The present study investigated the influence of distractors of different sensory modalities (i.e. auditory, visual and audiovisual) which were presented at various distances (i.e. close or remote) from a visual target. The interfering effects of a bimodal distractor were more pronounced in the spatial domain than in the temporal domain. The results indicate that the direction of interference depended on the spatial layout of the visual scene. The close bimodal distractor caused the saccade endpoint and saccade trajectory to deviate towards the distractor whereas the remote bimodal distractor caused a deviation away from the distractor. Furthermore, saccade averaging and trajectory deviation evoked by a bimodal distractor was larger compared to the effects evoked by a unimodal distractor. This indicates that a bimodal distractor evoked stronger spatial oculomotor competition compared to a unimodal distractor and that the direction of the interference depended on the distance between the target and the distractor. Together, these findings suggest that the oculomotor vector to irrelevant bimodal input is enhanced and that the interference by multisensory input is stronger compared to unisensory input.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4894297
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier Science Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48942972016-06-14 Oculomotor interference of bimodal distractors Heeman, Jessica Nijboer, Tanja C.W. Van der Stoep, Nathan Theeuwes, Jan Van der Stigchel, Stefan Vision Res Article When executing an eye movement to a target location, the presence of an irrelevant distracting stimulus can influence the saccade metrics and latency. The present study investigated the influence of distractors of different sensory modalities (i.e. auditory, visual and audiovisual) which were presented at various distances (i.e. close or remote) from a visual target. The interfering effects of a bimodal distractor were more pronounced in the spatial domain than in the temporal domain. The results indicate that the direction of interference depended on the spatial layout of the visual scene. The close bimodal distractor caused the saccade endpoint and saccade trajectory to deviate towards the distractor whereas the remote bimodal distractor caused a deviation away from the distractor. Furthermore, saccade averaging and trajectory deviation evoked by a bimodal distractor was larger compared to the effects evoked by a unimodal distractor. This indicates that a bimodal distractor evoked stronger spatial oculomotor competition compared to a unimodal distractor and that the direction of the interference depended on the distance between the target and the distractor. Together, these findings suggest that the oculomotor vector to irrelevant bimodal input is enhanced and that the interference by multisensory input is stronger compared to unisensory input. Elsevier Science Ltd 2016-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4894297/ /pubmed/27164053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2016.04.002 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Heeman, Jessica
Nijboer, Tanja C.W.
Van der Stoep, Nathan
Theeuwes, Jan
Van der Stigchel, Stefan
Oculomotor interference of bimodal distractors
title Oculomotor interference of bimodal distractors
title_full Oculomotor interference of bimodal distractors
title_fullStr Oculomotor interference of bimodal distractors
title_full_unstemmed Oculomotor interference of bimodal distractors
title_short Oculomotor interference of bimodal distractors
title_sort oculomotor interference of bimodal distractors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4894297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27164053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2016.04.002
work_keys_str_mv AT heemanjessica oculomotorinterferenceofbimodaldistractors
AT nijboertanjacw oculomotorinterferenceofbimodaldistractors
AT vanderstoepnathan oculomotorinterferenceofbimodaldistractors
AT theeuwesjan oculomotorinterferenceofbimodaldistractors
AT vanderstigchelstefan oculomotorinterferenceofbimodaldistractors