Cargando…
Oculomotor interference of bimodal distractors
When executing an eye movement to a target location, the presence of an irrelevant distracting stimulus can influence the saccade metrics and latency. The present study investigated the influence of distractors of different sensory modalities (i.e. auditory, visual and audiovisual) which were presen...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Science Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4894297/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27164053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2016.04.002 |
_version_ | 1782435658928750592 |
---|---|
author | Heeman, Jessica Nijboer, Tanja C.W. Van der Stoep, Nathan Theeuwes, Jan Van der Stigchel, Stefan |
author_facet | Heeman, Jessica Nijboer, Tanja C.W. Van der Stoep, Nathan Theeuwes, Jan Van der Stigchel, Stefan |
author_sort | Heeman, Jessica |
collection | PubMed |
description | When executing an eye movement to a target location, the presence of an irrelevant distracting stimulus can influence the saccade metrics and latency. The present study investigated the influence of distractors of different sensory modalities (i.e. auditory, visual and audiovisual) which were presented at various distances (i.e. close or remote) from a visual target. The interfering effects of a bimodal distractor were more pronounced in the spatial domain than in the temporal domain. The results indicate that the direction of interference depended on the spatial layout of the visual scene. The close bimodal distractor caused the saccade endpoint and saccade trajectory to deviate towards the distractor whereas the remote bimodal distractor caused a deviation away from the distractor. Furthermore, saccade averaging and trajectory deviation evoked by a bimodal distractor was larger compared to the effects evoked by a unimodal distractor. This indicates that a bimodal distractor evoked stronger spatial oculomotor competition compared to a unimodal distractor and that the direction of the interference depended on the distance between the target and the distractor. Together, these findings suggest that the oculomotor vector to irrelevant bimodal input is enhanced and that the interference by multisensory input is stronger compared to unisensory input. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4894297 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Elsevier Science Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48942972016-06-14 Oculomotor interference of bimodal distractors Heeman, Jessica Nijboer, Tanja C.W. Van der Stoep, Nathan Theeuwes, Jan Van der Stigchel, Stefan Vision Res Article When executing an eye movement to a target location, the presence of an irrelevant distracting stimulus can influence the saccade metrics and latency. The present study investigated the influence of distractors of different sensory modalities (i.e. auditory, visual and audiovisual) which were presented at various distances (i.e. close or remote) from a visual target. The interfering effects of a bimodal distractor were more pronounced in the spatial domain than in the temporal domain. The results indicate that the direction of interference depended on the spatial layout of the visual scene. The close bimodal distractor caused the saccade endpoint and saccade trajectory to deviate towards the distractor whereas the remote bimodal distractor caused a deviation away from the distractor. Furthermore, saccade averaging and trajectory deviation evoked by a bimodal distractor was larger compared to the effects evoked by a unimodal distractor. This indicates that a bimodal distractor evoked stronger spatial oculomotor competition compared to a unimodal distractor and that the direction of the interference depended on the distance between the target and the distractor. Together, these findings suggest that the oculomotor vector to irrelevant bimodal input is enhanced and that the interference by multisensory input is stronger compared to unisensory input. Elsevier Science Ltd 2016-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4894297/ /pubmed/27164053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2016.04.002 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Heeman, Jessica Nijboer, Tanja C.W. Van der Stoep, Nathan Theeuwes, Jan Van der Stigchel, Stefan Oculomotor interference of bimodal distractors |
title | Oculomotor interference of bimodal distractors |
title_full | Oculomotor interference of bimodal distractors |
title_fullStr | Oculomotor interference of bimodal distractors |
title_full_unstemmed | Oculomotor interference of bimodal distractors |
title_short | Oculomotor interference of bimodal distractors |
title_sort | oculomotor interference of bimodal distractors |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4894297/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27164053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2016.04.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heemanjessica oculomotorinterferenceofbimodaldistractors AT nijboertanjacw oculomotorinterferenceofbimodaldistractors AT vanderstoepnathan oculomotorinterferenceofbimodaldistractors AT theeuwesjan oculomotorinterferenceofbimodaldistractors AT vanderstigchelstefan oculomotorinterferenceofbimodaldistractors |